• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The death of American Nationalism

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Meuge
In my mind, the single biggest threat that this country faces today, is the disappearance of nationalism... on the part of the people, but even more so on the part of our leaders.

This sense of "belonging" has been replaced by arrogance and overwhelming greed and desire for personal wealth.

It seems that the idea that the success of the leader is also judged by the success of his country has been flushed down the corporate toilet.

Good post sir.

Sorry you couldn't be here a couple of decades ago before the Republicans destroyed America.

Which decade was it that Republicans destroyed America, Dave? A couple would be 2 - so 20 years ago. 1986 - Ronald Reagan did it? Why's it taking so long to collapse?
 
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Also, do you believe in one world government with a supreme dictator?
Only if it's me.
BTW, the lowest phone rates in Africa are in Somalia, a country that hasn't had a 'government' since the early '90s.
I think I have problems with my eyesight... but did you just use Somalia as an example of a good country to live in?

Relative to other countries in Africa it isn't doing so bad.

Text

BTW, there is a Jewish anarcho-capitalist economist:

A Jewish Anarcho-capitalist economist
 
Good post Meuge. Not only did you identify Good/Bad Nationalism, but I also think you nailed on the head many of the reasons why.

Not to divert the thread, but I also think recent Events have certainly not helped Americans to find their bearings either. Too many issues have turned out to be disasters, too many events have served to embarrass and to bring doubt to the American soul, too many people have settled for the Bad Nationalist nature, that any hope for America to turn around grows dimmer as time passes.
 
Originally posted by: sandorski
Good post Meuge. Not only did you identify Good/Bad Nationalism, but I also think you nailed on the head many of the reasons why.

Not to divert the thread, but I also think recent Events have certainly not helped Americans to find their bearings either. Too many issues have turned out to be disasters, too many events have served to embarrass and to bring doubt to the American soul, too many people have settled for the Bad Nationalist nature, that any hope for America to turn around grows dimmer as time passes.

So in other words 'good' nationalism is leftist nationalism? :roll:
 
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: sandorski
Good post Meuge. Not only did you identify Good/Bad Nationalism, but I also think you nailed on the head many of the reasons why.

Not to divert the thread, but I also think recent Events have certainly not helped Americans to find their bearings either. Too many issues have turned out to be disasters, too many events have served to embarrass and to bring doubt to the American soul, too many people have settled for the Bad Nationalist nature, that any hope for America to turn around grows dimmer as time passes.

So in other words 'good' nationalism is leftist nationalism? :roll:

If that's what you call it, then yes!

Bad Nationalism is the type that believes that one can do no wrong no matter what they do.

Gas an Ethnic group, must be the Right thing to do, because we are doing it!

Invade a country that has no issue with you, must be Right because we are doing it!

Let people live destitute in the streets, must be Right because we are doing it!

etc, ad nauseum

What's Right is Right, what's Wrong is Wrong, even if you do it. This is the mantra of a true Naionalist, one who wants to see his/her nation become something better, not worse.
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
As for the topic, I would reject the idea that American Nationalism (of the positive variety) ever existed at all. Our history is not exactly filled with positive role models of the kind of national and patriotic pride the OP is talking about. In fact, our history shows examples of selfish actions much worse than we see today.

Uhhh, what country are you living in?

 
Originally posted by: Meuge

Socialism? I think you have your definitions mixed up. Given your ideas in this thread, I do believe your ideal state should be filed under... say... anarchy.

He says he wishes for anarchy, but in reality, there isn't any such thing as anarchy. Rather, some powerful gang would end up controlling the use of physical force and become a de facto despotic government. The question isn't really about whether or not to have a government, but rather, which type to have.

Government cannot exist without taxes... thus the only state possible without government is the state of nature... which is anarchy. You've never lived in an anarchy, so before you decide to advocate it, I suggest you go live in Africa, or East Asia, where warlords roam the lands.

OMG--you mean that the end result of anarchy is...dictatorship by warring gangs of thugs?
 
Originally posted by: Bowfinger

(By the way, ask him to explain his theory that there should be no government military forces, but that private insurance companies should have their own armies. It's a hoot! The ask him what happens when Allstate decides to attack State Farm. If it's like the last time I asked, he'll disappear.)

Or what happens when you accuse me of theft and you hire private police force A to apprehend me. Then I hire private police force B to protect me from your unjust claims and the band of thugs that you hired to apprehend me.
 
Originally posted by: Dissipate

BTW, the lowest phone rates in Africa are in Somalia, a country that hasn't had a 'government' since the early '90s.

What good are the low phone rates when few people have telephones?
 
Originally posted by: alchemize

Which decade was it that Republicans destroyed America, Dave? A couple would be 2 - so 20 years ago. 1986 - Ronald Reagan did it? Why's it taking so long to collapse?

I have enough blame to go around for both of the parties. They're both bad. Throw all the bums out of the Congress, I say.
 
I think nationalism is one of the biggest problems in our world today. We have become so overwhemed with only helping our own country, many others around the world suffer due to irrational reasoning.

For example, the EU was created for 3 key economic values; free flow of labour markets, efficient capital markets, and productivity improvements through economies of scale. Through the development of the EU, many countries are putting resrictions on foriegn ownership, limiting these markets from evolving and rallying around nationalist views through protectoinist means.

Similarly with the US and others in the first world; many feel just because they were born into a prosperous nation, they are entitled to more than other more deserving people around the world. Sense of entitlement is another problem steming from these nationalistic views; again leads to irrational protectionist and restrictive measures. These nationalistic views tend to rear their ugly heads on immigration, outsourcing, foreign ownership, subsidies.

If the US is becoming less nationalistic, i welcome this; hopefully other countries follow suit.
 
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: Dissipate
I find it ironic that your family fled the USSR only to have you come here to the U.S. and start advocating socialism.
Wait... what?

Socialism? I think you have your definitions mixed up. Given your ideas in this thread, I do believe your ideal state should be filed under... say... anarchy.

Government cannot exist without taxes... thus the only state possible without government is the state of nature... which is anarchy. You've never lived in an anarchy, so before you decide to advocate it, I suggest you go live in Africa, or East Asia, where warlords roam the lands.
Dissipate only knows one song, and the more you point out how little sense it makes, the louder he sings it.

(By the way, ask him to explain his theory that there should be no government military forces, but that private insurance companies should have their own armies. It's a hoot! The ask him what happens when Allstate decides to attack State Farm. If it's like the last time I asked, he'll disappear.)
How many songs have you been singing other than the one about how you love getting taxed and regulated?
I don't love getting taxed and regulated all. I am, however, reasoned enough to recognize that my personal success was greatly facilitated by the opportunities presented by our extraordinary physical, educational, and financial infrastructure, and I am mature enough to recognize there is no such thing as a free lunch. If I want to live in a country offering such extraordinary opportunities, I have to be willing to help pay for them ... so I do. If you don't, perhaps you should move to Somalia. I hear they have great phone rates ... to nowhere.

As I've said many times, I'd prefer to keep 60% of a Big Gulp than 90% of a shot glass. While you're busy whining about the imaginary 40% you "lost", I'm prefer to be positive and constructive, enjoying 100% of the 60% I have.

(Edit. By the way, I actually started to put together a list of all of my "songs", i.e., the positions and issues I've supported/advocated/debated here. I realized how totally absurd your accusation was when I was up to about thirty with no end in sight. You have exactly one song with two related verses -- government bad, taxes bad -- and you constantly burst into singing it in all the inappropriate places, like this thread.)


I've gone over my theory of the military a number of times, includng your non-issue.
Sure you have. Links?
 
Me: In my mind, the single biggest threat that this country faces today, is the disappearance of nationalism... on the part of the people, but even more so on the part of our leaders. Not the xenophobic, hateful, fascist nationalism that oh-too-many countries in the world promote... but rather the healthy, patriotic interest in the success of the country as a whole.

Mo: Do you really think that people who think of the welfare of the country are thinking of the country or welfare in general. I think my concern for the welfare of my country is more about the welfare of the human race and all actions are local. I would question whether what you refer to as healthy patriotism is patriotism at all.

Me: This sense of "belonging" has been replaced by arrogance and overwhelming greed and desire for personal wealth.

Mo: But this has always been the dilemma, no? I think people are more altruistic when secure than when filled with fear. But we have discovered, have we not, that fear sells papers and gets fear mongers elected.

Me: It seems that the idea that the success of the leader is also judged by the success of his country has been flushed down the corporate toilet.

Mo: Not if by success you mean getting elected. 😀

Me: Now, don't get me wrong - I am all for self-interest. It is in the nature of any man (and woman) to strive to enrich themselves. But nowadays, this "enrichment" seems to be limited strictly to the monetary kind.

Mo: Grab all the gusto you can, right? Isn't that interest in self the very means by which capitalism is propelled? Buying product is what will make you happy, I've been told millions of times. I was going to help my neighbor but the bastard bought a better car than me.

Me: I am appalled at the economic and political trends that we have allowed to continue.

Mo: Which?

Me: What happened to the spirit of the great leaders of the history books - leaders who have sought, with all their might, to reform, to improve, and to enrich their nations!

Mo: I think most of them had the history books written. 😉

Me: What happened to the idea that a leader can accumulate wealth without destroying the very basis of the machine that generated that wealth in the first place!

Mo: Huh?

Me: But let's look wider - is this trend limited to the halls of power? The answer is a resounding "no". The ultra-materialist, consumerist culture that we have bogged down in, leaves no room for anything other than immediate self-interest. Just watching network TV for a few hours leaves me with a horrified impression that we no longer value the idea of "creating" something... if it interferes with our immediate gain... or if it takes any real effort altogether.

Mo: Network TV is in the business of creating a circus that delivers a maximum number of eyeballs to advertisers. They are not in the information business except as a circus act. If it bleeds is leads, you see.

Me: It appears as if the only solution our society has for any problems we now encounter, is to throw money at it... as if additional funds could stop our children from worshipping ideals of violence, ignorance, and idleness... as if more money could save us from the impending crumbling of healthcare due to massive consuming bureacracies... or the inability to take care of our elderly - the very generation that saved the world from the iron fist of Nazi oppression.

Mo: The issue is not to solve problems. The issue is to get enough votes to get re-elected.

Me: I sit here, a foreigner, and I am horrified at the fact that I can see myself having a deeper regard for the ideals, ideals, and future of the United States, then many of the people who were born here... and many of the people who are leading us into oblivion. Maybe it's just paranoia, born out of the oppressive regime I was brought up in, but perhaps what I see has some truth to it. I leave it up to you to decide.

Mo: Transplanting from one culture to another can interfere with the programming of the first and mess up implantation of the second. Just don't worry about things. Think about what you can buy. Imagine yourself in a new Mustang. Everything will be all right.

 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Meuge
In my mind, the single biggest threat that this country faces today, is the disappearance of nationalism... on the part of the people, but even more so on the part of our leaders.

This sense of "belonging" has been replaced by arrogance and overwhelming greed and desire for personal wealth.

It seems that the idea that the success of the leader is also judged by the success of his country has been flushed down the corporate toilet.

Good post sir.

Sorry you couldn't be here a couple of decades ago before the Republicans destroyed America.

Which decade was it that Republicans destroyed America, Dave? A couple would be 2 - so 20 years ago. 1986 - Ronald Reagan did it? Why's it taking so long to collapse?

Yep, Reagan started the absolute bullcrap of trickle down Economics in which nothing flows down but crap, the rich just get richer.

It only took so long because the U.S. had a real American at the helm in between with Clinton.

Hell the guy even loves sex which the prude Republicans raked him over the coals with.
 
If anything we need LESS nationalism when miscommunication and understanding is diving people in the nation and also causing wars abroad.
 
Originally posted by: novon
If anything we need LESS nationalism when miscommunication and understanding is dividing people in the nation and also causing wars abroad.

You're confusing Nationalism with brainwashed puppetry called Republican.

Certainly not the same thing.
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: novon
If anything we need LESS nationalism when miscommunication and understanding is dividing people in the nation and also causing wars abroad.
You're confusing Nationalism with brainwashed puppetry called Republican.

Certainly not the same thing.
Flag waving idiots know no bounds.
Just look at all the protectionists in the Dem camp.
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Meuge
In my mind, the single biggest threat that this country faces today, is the disappearance of nationalism... on the part of the people, but even more so on the part of our leaders.

This sense of "belonging" has been replaced by arrogance and overwhelming greed and desire for personal wealth.

It seems that the idea that the success of the leader is also judged by the success of his country has been flushed down the corporate toilet.

Good post sir.

Sorry you couldn't be here a couple of decades ago before the Republicans destroyed America.

Which decade was it that Republicans destroyed America, Dave? A couple would be 2 - so 20 years ago. 1986 - Ronald Reagan did it? Why's it taking so long to collapse?

Yep, Reagan started the absolute bullcrap of trickle down Economics in which nothing flows down but crap, the rich just get richer.

It only took so long because the U.S. had a real American at the helm in between with Clinton.

Hell the guy even loves sex which the prude Republicans raked him over the coals with.


I could be wrong, but didnt JFK drop the federal income tax on the top 1% from 90% to 50%?

Think you may want to look further back for your theory to hold any water.
 
I don't think Republicans destroyed America. I think the 1950s fat cats are doing it. The oil magnates, the media execs, the communications CEOs - many of them seem to be the epitome of the stereotypical "old white men", who have no limits to their power, no fear of anything, and no tolerance for any innovation. I think that in order for this to pass, we may very well have to wait until they pass... and more progressive industry leaders take over. It may be a pipe dream, but I'll take Sergey Brin over Kenneth Lay any day.
 
Originally posted by: Meuge
In my mind, the single biggest threat that this country faces today, is the disappearance of nationalism... on the part of the people, but even more so on the part of our leaders. Not the xenophobic, hateful, fascist nationalism that oh-too-many countries in the world promote... but rather the healthy, patriotic interest in the success of the country as a whole.

This sense of "belonging" has been replaced by arrogance and overwhelming greed and desire for personal wealth. It seems that the idea that the success of the leader is also judged by the success of his country has been flushed down the corporate toilet. Now, don't get me wrong - I am all for self-interest. It is in the nature of any man (and woman) to strive to enrich themselves. But nowadays, this "enrichment" seems to be limited strictly to the monetary kind. I am appalled at the economic and political trends that we have allowed to continue.

What happened to the spirit of the great leaders of the history books - leaders who have sought, with all their might, to reform, to improve, and to enrich their nations! What happened to the idea that a leader can accumulate wealth without destroying the very basis of the machine that generated that wealth in the first place!

But let's look wider - is this trend limited to the halls of power? The answer is a resounding "no". The ultra-materialist, consumerist culture that we have bogged down in, leaves no room for anything other than immediate self-interest. Just watching network TV for a few hours leaves me with a horrified impression that we no longer value the idea of "creating" something... if it interferes with our immediate gain... or if it takes any real effort altogether. It appears as if the only solution our society has for any problems we now encounter, is to throw money at it... as if additional funds could stop our children from worshipping ideals of violence, ignorance, and idleness... as if more money could save us from the impending crumbling of healthcare due to massive consuming bureacracies... or the inability to take care of our elderly - the very generation that saved the world from the iron fist of Nazi oppression.

I sit here, a foreigner, and I am horrified at the fact that I can see myself having a deeper regard for the ideals, ideals, and future of the United States, then many of the people who were born here... and many of the people who are leading us into oblivion. Maybe it's just paranoia, born out of the oppressive regime I was brought up in, but perhaps what I see has some truth to it. I leave it up to you to decide.
Careful.

It's the lamentation of a lack of a nationalistic mentality that gave rise to the neoconservative movement and also gave rise to the militant Islamist movement. Check out The Power of Nightmares to see the eery similarities in the philosophies of the two.

Also, America is a very large and disparate country. America is made from a mix of cultures. It's not like, say, Ireland or Germany or Spain. The shear size of America's geography almost precludes an overriding national identity.

But, re: the consumerism aspect of today's society, yes I agree with you and have written about it a bit, myself.

It's going to take something like the next Great Depression to wake Americans out of their boob-tube-induced stupor.
 
Originally posted by: Meuge
I don't think Republicans destroyed America. I think the 1950s fat cats are doing it. The oil magnates, the media execs, the communications CEOs - many of them seem to be the epitome of the stereotypical "old white men", who have no limits to their power, no fear of anything, and no tolerance for any innovation. I think that in order for this to pass, we may very well have to wait until they pass... and more progressive industry leaders take over. It may be a pipe dream, but I'll take Sergey Brin over Kenneth Lay any day.
There are many similarities between the "robber barons" of the early 1900s and those of today's corporate execs.
 
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: Rainsford

How do you have a government without taxation? If all taxation and all government is socialism, how does one run a country? It seems problamatic at best.

Simple, it is called voluntary payment for services. You pay for the natural elite's services voluntarily. This would be not much different than say church donations.

A country doesn't need to be 'run.' A country can run itself, and if it doesn't want to 'run' then it doesn't. No government can change that fact.
The problem is that many of the government services cannot exist, unless they are universal. The only reason you can claim these ideas, is because you're sitting in a comfortable, warm home... with telephone service, running water, and garbage that is removed twice a week, as well as policemen, federal agents, rules, regulations, schools, etc.. etc.. etc..

Civilized life is impossible without a centralized government system - history has shown us that on many occasions. If you doubt it, just do one thing for me - show me a country that is wealthy, educated, civilized, and where there are no taxes.
While Dissipate is an extremist, you are caving in.

Water? Not a tax.
Telephone? not a tax.
Garbage collection? Not a tax.
Electricity and gas service are also not taxes.

These services we consider essential are paid for voluntarily. They are 'universal' because there is universal demand, not because sitting property (I'll include vehicles in that, BTW) or salary needs to be garnished to make them work.
 
Originally posted by: Meuge
I don't think Republicans destroyed America. I think the 1950s fat cats are doing it. The oil magnates, the media execs, the communications CEOs - many of them seem to be the epitome of the stereotypical "old white men", who have no limits to their power, no fear of anything, and no tolerance for any innovation. I think that in order for this to pass, we may very well have to wait until they pass... and more progressive industry leaders take over. It may be a pipe dream, but I'll take Sergey Brin over Kenneth Lay any day.
I would dare say innovation is their one fear, because it could put them out, and force them to take risks. They must keep progressives from taking over until the Earth is unable to cope (which we've clearly past, but that will get debated feircely until we're almost a memory).

...why should I foster or help serve nationalism, when it's the raving nationalists that are doing their best to run the country?
 
Originally posted by: Bowfinger

I don't love getting taxed and regulated all. I am, however, reasoned enough to recognize that my personal success was greatly facilitated by the opportunities presented by our extraordinary physical, educational, and financial infrastructure, and I am mature enough to recognize there is no such thing as a free lunch. If I want to live in a country offering such extraordinary opportunities, I have to be willing to help pay for them ... so I do. If you don't, perhaps you should move to Somalia. I hear they have great phone rates ... to nowhere.

If I am going to move to Somalia, perhaps you should move to China. They have a strong central government. Should be paradise for you.

'Extraordinary' physical, educational, and financial infrastructure? That's a joke to begin with, especially with regards to education. But the truth of the matter is that the bulk of government expenditures are what are known as transfer payments (welfare) and warfare. If all the government did was set up telephone lines, pave roads, provide 'education,' and courts I could live with that. But only a fraction of the enormous budget is spent on that stuff. Look at the budget yourself. We aren't talking about infrastructure here, we are talking about welfare and warfare. These two things are the most expensive and most outrageous things to spend on. Get rid of those and you could slash the budget by at least 80-90%.

As I've said many times, I'd prefer to keep 60% of a Big Gulp than 90% of a shot glass. While you're busy whining about the imaginary 40% you "lost", I'm prefer to be positive and constructive, enjoying 100% of the 60% I have.

I'm glad you realize you have said this fallacious and completely unsupported bullsh!t a number of times. In fact I believe this is your only song.

(Edit. By the way, I actually started to put together a list of all of my "songs", i.e., the positions and issues I've supported/advocated/debated here. I realized how totally absurd your accusation was when I was up to about thirty with no end in sight. You have exactly one song with two related verses -- government bad, taxes bad -- and you constantly burst into singing it in all the inappropriate places, like this thread.)

:music: Big Gulps and shot glasses... :music:

Damn, that song sucks.


Sure you have. Links?

1 (Especially section 4)

2

3

4

...:music: Get your woman on the floor. :music:
:music: Gotta gotta get up, get down...:music:
 
Back
Top