<<
Another thing which led to my conclusion was the math thing. On the math section I outscored people who had finished 4, or even 5 years of math classes...trig, calc, math analysis, etc. That shouldn't be possible. Math is the section where anyone who's had the classes SHOULD be able to score perfect or near perfect, unlike the verbal where it's entirely dependent on your exposure to the language, or understanding of language in general. For me to outscore others had to mean that either the test did not actually test math (as currently defined), or that what was taught was not useful for the test, or that there was a totally non-math related reason for the scores. I believe it was in fact a combination, as previously stated. >>
The math section on the SAT is actually quite easy... despicably easy at some times... however it's the small errors that really throw the people off and drop their over score

. The thing is, if you know how to approach the math portion, then there is a great possibilty of you scoring an 800. Process of eliminations, knowing which answers are probable and which are not always eliminate time off the clock time is required per problem - and the less time you spend on a problem, then more time you'll have to actually review your work and such
These are merely methods of test-taking... you don't need a great deal of mathematical studies to take the MATH portion of the SAT I (MATH on the SATII is a different matter all together).... reasons such as these are why
the Princeton Review, Kaplan, among others flourish as successful SAT prep courses. It's not how advanced you are in math... or what level of calculus you're in... if you don't know how to take the math portion of the test, then you're not going to score as high as you'd want to. Test-taking skills really matter
that much
The VERBAL section on the other hand.... wow - that's one tough cookie - I actually studied by reading the dictionary

sure POE works at some points during the Verbal section, but overall it's all about diction buffness that prevails
<<
As for guilt, don't. Would you rather use your intelligence for no great cause, but be happy and content...or use your intelligence to create a weapon of mass destruction which terrorizes the entire world for generations? Personally I'd much rather smart people sit and play nintendo than form an evil overlord type corporation/dictatorship and abuse humanity with their abilities.
>>
Remember my posts on EGOISM? Well, maybe you should go read it

It'll cover most of what I would say about the matter that you have just brought to the table

in a nutshell it just depends on what hte goal of this "smart" person is... he can be smart but misled (McVeigh) or he can be some other proportion of an Einstein... or anything of that nature. Read more about it
HERE
Well, it's 4 AM here in Los Angeles.... 4 hours from my Accounting class - I guess it's time for me to get started on my philosophy
)(GG)