The Classic "Israel Did 9-11, All the Proof in the World" Thread, @TIU

[manowar821]

No, son, he isn't but you are. You are so hellbent on knowing the truth that you ignore reality.

Reality isn't your own percieved truth intermixed with your lunatics version of whatever mix of religions you follow and the blogs of retards, it just is what it is.

Occams razor bitch, look it up.

I don't know what the hell this Jewish conspiracy crap is about, but I'll just say that declaring "Occams Razor LOL" doesn't defeat the laws of physics.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Son, i don't know how the fuck you can mix moonbeam and me up but obviously you have.

My parents didn't abort me, i was "wanted" until i proclaimed that i could not understand their beliefs and for my honesty i was made homeless at age 13.

rofl....sob story if I ever heard one......

You must have a million of them as Jimmy Durante would say!!

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

I don't know what the hell this Jewish conspiracy crap is about, but I'll just say that declaring "Occams Razor LOL" doesn't defeat the laws of physics.

When where the laws of physics ever questioned. Are you posting in the wrong thread?

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

rofl....sob story if I ever heard one......

You must have a million of them as Jimmy Durante would say!!

For plenty of people the reality they encounter IS a sob story, it's still their reality.

I have only one story and it seemed apt to tell it to understand where i am coming from.

Of course you cannot understand it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How could you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are too busy making no sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??!!??!!!

I'll go right ahead and assume that calling someone a failed abortion is ok since no mod interfered (i do not mind that at all btw).

Were you the premie who was supposed to die but ended up just unusually stupid??!!!!!!!!!???!

 

[Craig234]

rofl....sob story if I ever heard one......

You must have a million of them as Jimmy Durante would say!!

Don't use personal information people share to attack them. It's one of the lowest things to do here and hurts the forum. Why would they share anything if you attack them for it?

 

[Craig234]

When where the laws of physics ever questioned. Are you posting in the wrong thread?

I'll translate based on my suspicion what he was saying.

He said he's not backing the Jewish conspiracy theories, but he does accept the 'conspiracy theories'.

He summarized his reason as a criticism of the defenders it was Al Queda, by saying their position is 'Occam's razor LOL', in other words they claim Occam's razor, saying the simplest explanation is one to look at, 'proves' the conspiracies are wrong; he claimed that physics proves his opinions that the bildings were blown up and this is the more compelling position.

I'd say one of his problems is the straw man for spporters it was Al Queda.

A second problem is his assumption/conclusion that physics proves his position.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Don't use personal information people share to attack them. It's one of the lowest things to do here and hurts the forum. Why would they share anything if you attack them for it?

No worries, i don't think anyone but him cares about anything he says anyway.


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

I'll translate based on my suspicion what he was saying.

He said he's not backing the Jewish conspiracy theories, but he does accept the 'conspiracy theories'.

He summarized his reason as a criticism of the defenders it was Al Queda, by saying their position is 'Occam's razor LOL', in other words they claim Occam's razor, saying the simplest explanation is one to look at, 'proves' the conspiracies are wrong; he claimed that physics proves his opinions that the bildings were blown up and this is the more compelling position.

I'd say one of his problems is the straw man for spporters it was Al Queda.

A second problem is his assumption/conclusion that physics proves his position.

That doesn't really make anything clearer.

Naturally the laws of physics dictates that a free falling object will accelerate until it reaches the speed of a falling object, Newton knew his shiet and acceleration WAS the key point when the towers collapsed, well density and speed of course, collision physics also come into play here because of that.

Occams razor would say that the simplest explanation is the correct one and to this day, i have not encountered any information that would change that, the towers fell as they did BECAUSE of he laws of physics (density+acceleration).

So i still don't get the point here. We were discussing biology and all of a sudden he comes raving about conspiracies proven by physics? Doesn't make any sense what so ever to me.

 

[Craig234]

That doesn't really make anything clearer.

Naturally the laws of physics dictates that a free falling object will accelerate until it reaches the speed of a falling object, Newton knew his shiet and acceleration WAS the key point when the towers collapsed, well density and speed of course, collision physics also come into play here because of that.

Occams razor would say that the simplest explanation is the correct one and to this day, i have not encountered any information that would change that, the towers fell as they did BECAUSE of he laws of physics (density+acceleration).

So i still don't get the point here. We were discussing biology and all of a sudden he comes raving about conspiracies proven by physics? Doesn't make any sense what so ever to me.

Well, I think I clearedup what he said well, but if it still doesn't make any sense to you, that probably has to do with what his position is.

A translation can't explain why he jumped from biology to claiming physics backs his position - it can just say he did say it.

We have here a topic involving complex physics, architectural, chemical issues, and laymen to debate them.

What could go wrong? It's like the discussions on what the JFK assassination film 'proves' under physics.