Work through the math, it's not just short trips. If you get a 35 mile all electric range and 35 mpg on gas (which is what car and driver talks about after their testing) you'll have to go 117 miles before the Prius will use less gas. Because the majority of drivers drive less than that per day they'll burn less gas.
It's not a more expensive Prius, show me a Prius that can do a short commute without burning a drop of fuel. As has been said ad nauseum, this is not a car was not designed for somebody that consistently drives long trips every day. This is a car designed for someone that usually drives within (or maybe slightly more than) the electric range but sometimes needs to do longer trips.
I disagree. I know how the vehicle was marketed and the claims GM made. I stand by my opinions about the Volt. The range on a small tank of fuel was a large part of the Volt's marketing.
I also know what sort of driving I do and those around me as well. I know how long it would take me to break even on a Volt purchase, and I'm tired of the whole subject.
It's a trendy niche car that is bettered by much cheaper cars, imo. Buying it is not an economically sound purchase, and I really don't think that can be disputed.
The car was heavily subsidized in development, and heavily subsidized to the buyer, and it turns out to be an ordinary hybrid with a larger battery.
Quite disappointing to me to have spent that much money on a car and end up with a plug in Prius with a larger battery, imo.