- Sep 28, 2005
- 21,042
- 3,522
- 126
I've heard from people that have it on PS5 it runs smooth which I guess makes sense since it's an amd sponsored title so console performance probably is easier to work on. Dlss won't be in this game at all I think.
i don't think its running at 60fps then.
Im willing to bet its downscaling to 1080p, and then running it at 45 if a 4090 can not steam roll though it.
A 4090 is 10x more powerful then a PS5.... it makes absolute no sense unless its downscaled heavily and not running at 60fps.

GeForce RTX 4090 With Over 100 TFLOPS Is 10 Times Faster Than PlayStation 5
The next-generation flagship graphics card from NVIDIA camp, GeForce RTX 4090, would be up to 10x faster than the PlayStation 5

Thats like going PLAID in spaceballs zooming past the PS5 going light speed.
It's probably a happy side effect of having a single pool of RAM on console rather than the separate system and video RAM on PCs. Maybe AMD should just sell Zen 2 CPUs on their graphics cards alongside the GPU.
again that make no sense as a 4090 has 24GB of GDDR6x, and a PS5 has 16GB of GDDR6.
The 4090 has not only a generation advantage in ram, but also a + 8gb capacity and also is paired with a nvme gen4 drive going by his signature, so the nVME can be ruled out.
The game was either written on a MAC ported for PS5, and then ported over to Xbox X and PC, or the PS5 is Hacking somehow by downresing, limiting shadows and textures, and frame caping.
How is the game on a Xbox X? Hardware wise the Xbox X is superior from looking at specs.
Last edited: