The books the HRCC doesn't want christians to read.

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Are you telling me that religious crazies actually have arguments amongst themselves regarding the details of their fairy tales? Really? You're all insane.

Despite the fact that it is quite silly in light of the full electromagnetic spectrum, to believe in ghosts and fairy stories, the Catholics are in FACT responsible for collecting and saving a large part of the scientific material developed prior to the dark ages, and are a large part of the reason why we can sit here in two thousand eight to arrogantly cast stones.

1. The dark ages that the catholic church was responsible for? Good job, that's like congratulating the arsonist for not lighting the family pets on fire too.
2. Everything necessary for modern science was either discovered after the dark ages or better preserved by muslims and recovered by Renaissance thinkers.

That's a little bit of an over simplification to say that the Catholics were entirely responsible for the Dark Ages.

Without the monasteries of Europe, protecting many valuable bits of data, we would still be at least 50 years behind where we are presently (which is an immense amount of time these days).
 

oddyager

Diamond Member
May 21, 2005
3,398
0
76

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
The Nicene Council. NEEDS Correcting These are 2 seperate events. Sorry about that . I am not going to correct it everywere

THE COUNCIL OF LAODICEA IN PHRYGIA PACATIANA 364 A.D.


This is when the HRCC was formed. This is the man that resided over it . And actually setup the forum of the HRCC after the roman system . it still exist today in the same form /Roman Emperor Constantine I .

Here are the books they don't want you to read . F.
If your a christian struggling in your faith. Read these banned books.

:confused:

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1


Or you haven't read the books ya claim are in the Bible

So apparently you know the word 'you', but willfully transpose it with 'ya'. Interesting.

Who gives man authority over man . None. These aren't my rules. I don't play in your game . I do as I please . Man has no hold on me .

:confused: :confused:

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Your kidding right I am alive in the year 2008. The world is a shit hole . You talk of dignity . Maybe my eyes decieve me . Maybe my ears decieve me. Maybe reasonning escapes me. I don't know . But I think not. I have more proof God is than he isn't . Look at the universe , Its enough proof for me . Everyone has a differant threshhold . Some could talk to God directly and still reject him . I don't know . But I haven't stopped looking .

But today . To use the word dignity in same sentance as man . Is a bit funny.

Read the Gay marriage thread LOL . Talk dignity . Or the other multi spouse thread were the same people who believe in gay marriage reject multi partner marriage . Dignity you say.

I showed you some respect. I still have some dignity. Your edit . I said nothing about grown. I new what ya meant. . Ya understand what I am saying.

:confused: :confused: :confused:

 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: Modelworks
The most interesting read to me is the Gospel of Judas. In it he claims that he did not betray Jesus and that he was doing as Jesus asked him to.

The text about Mary Magdalene that claim she was closer to Jesus than any other disciple would have never made it into the bible back then. A woman, not only equal to a man, but elevated above one ? Are you mad ?


It is very hard to get a complete idea of anything written in those times. There are lots of texts that were burned during various ages in history.

Also remember when this stuff was written.
Don't expect a man from 2000 years ago to explain creation with a paper on parallel universes and the big bang.

OK ok great . 1 question . Mary mag . Ya its short and incomplete . But what was your take on what was saved in the text. There is more.

 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
The most interesting read to me is the Gospel of Judas. In it he claims that he did not betray Jesus and that he was doing as Jesus asked him to.

The text about Mary Magdalene that claim she was closer to Jesus than any other disciple would have never made it into the bible back then. A woman, not only equal to a man, but elevated above one ? Are you mad ?


It is very hard to get a complete idea of anything written in those times. There are lots of texts that were burned during various ages in history.

Also remember when this stuff was written.
Don't expect a man from 2000 years ago to explain creation with a paper on parallel universes and the big bang.

OK ok great . 1 question . Mary mag . Ya its short and incomplete . But what was your take on what was saved in the text. There is more.


My take on what was saved ?
I've read the exact manuscript of everything they have translated word for word.
There is no conspiracy here. Just a bunch of long dead people that wanted people to see things their way.

I'm a fan of Roman history so I read everything I can that concerns that era . There are several good translations done by independent scholars not associated with any church.
They don't put any slant on it, they are only concerned with the historical value.

 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Are you telling me that religious crazies actually have arguments amongst themselves regarding the details of their fairy tales? Really? You're all insane.

Despite the fact that it is quite silly in light of the full electromagnetic spectrum, to believe in ghosts and fairy stories, the Catholics are in FACT responsible for collecting and saving a large part of the scientific material developed prior to the dark ages, and are a large part of the reason why we can sit here in two thousand eight to arrogantly cast stones.

1. The dark ages that the catholic church was responsible for? Good job, that's like congratulating the arsonist for not lighting the family pets on fire too.
2. Everything necessary for modern science was either discovered after the dark ages or better preserved by muslims and recovered by Renaissance thinkers.

THat was good and so very true.

Which is not to say that Catholics today are bad people -- Catholicism and its non literal take on the bible are among the more reasonable of the popular fantasies, even if they are against public health initiatives like contraceptives.

Ok good good. Now if I were to say something like this . In order to find the complete works of the prophets. One has to look at all the great religions of the world.
Whats your response to that.

 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Are you telling me that religious crazies actually have arguments amongst themselves regarding the details of their fairy tales? Really? You're all insane.

Despite the fact that it is quite silly in light of the full electromagnetic spectrum, to believe in ghosts and fairy stories, the Catholics are in FACT responsible for collecting and saving a large part of the scientific material developed prior to the dark ages, and are a large part of the reason why we can sit here in two thousand eight to arrogantly cast stones.

1. The dark ages that the catholic church was responsible for? Good job, that's like congratulating the arsonist for not lighting the family pets on fire too.
2. Everything necessary for modern science was either discovered after the dark ages or better preserved by muslims and recovered by Renaissance thinkers.

That's a little bit of an over simplification to say that the Catholics were entirely responsible for the Dark Ages.

Without the monasteries of Europe, protecting many valuable bits of data, we would still be at least 50 years behind where we are presently (which is an immense amount of time these days).

What makes you say that? What data would we be missing that would set us FIFTY years back.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Are you telling me that religious crazies actually have arguments amongst themselves regarding the details of their fairy tales? Really? You're all insane.

Despite the fact that it is quite silly in light of the full electromagnetic spectrum, to believe in ghosts and fairy stories, the Catholics are in FACT responsible for collecting and saving a large part of the scientific material developed prior to the dark ages, and are a large part of the reason why we can sit here in two thousand eight to arrogantly cast stones.

1. The dark ages that the catholic church was responsible for? Good job, that's like congratulating the arsonist for not lighting the family pets on fire too.
2. Everything necessary for modern science was either discovered after the dark ages or better preserved by muslims and recovered by Renaissance thinkers.

THat was good and so very true.

Which is not to say that Catholics today are bad people -- Catholicism and its non literal take on the bible are among the more reasonable of the popular fantasies, even if they are against public health initiatives like contraceptives.

Ok good good. Now if I were to say something like this . In order to find the complete works of the prophets. One has to look at all the great religions of the world.
Whats your response to that.

That there are no religions I would define as "great"

Seriously though, what point are you trying to raise? I don't see a real gotcha there.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
And for anyone that is not getting it. Nemesis 1 is railing about the Catholic Church; how and why they are false (do not preach the true message of Christ). The main argument seems to center on which day peeling potatoes is permissible.

You did well . But its not about a day in the week . Its about completion. The true meaning of the LORDS day. its a period in time . Not a day in the week.

This is THE most important thing for christians to know and understand.

 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Are you telling me that religious crazies actually have arguments amongst themselves regarding the details of their fairy tales? Really? You're all insane.

Despite the fact that it is quite silly in light of the full electromagnetic spectrum, to believe in ghosts and fairy stories, the Catholics are in FACT responsible for collecting and saving a large part of the scientific material developed prior to the dark ages, and are a large part of the reason why we can sit here in two thousand eight to arrogantly cast stones.

1. The dark ages that the catholic church was responsible for? Good job, that's like congratulating the arsonist for not lighting the family pets on fire too.
2. Everything necessary for modern science was either discovered after the dark ages or better preserved by muslims and recovered by Renaissance thinkers.

THat was good and so very true.

Which is not to say that Catholics today are bad people -- Catholicism and its non literal take on the bible are among the more reasonable of the popular fantasies, even if they are against public health initiatives like contraceptives.

Ok good good. Now if I were to say something like this . In order to find the complete works of the prophets. One has to look at all the great religions of the world.
Whats your response to that.

That there are no religions I would define as "great"

Seriously though, what point are you trying to raise? I don't see a real gotcha there.

No one is trying to trick you . There is no gotha. Its about learning. Ok

 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Are you telling me that religious crazies actually have arguments amongst themselves regarding the details of their fairy tales? Really? You're all insane.

Despite the fact that it is quite silly in light of the full electromagnetic spectrum, to believe in ghosts and fairy stories, the Catholics are in FACT responsible for collecting and saving a large part of the scientific material developed prior to the dark ages, and are a large part of the reason why we can sit here in two thousand eight to arrogantly cast stones.

1. The dark ages that the catholic church was responsible for? Good job, that's like congratulating the arsonist for not lighting the family pets on fire too.
2. Everything necessary for modern science was either discovered after the dark ages or better preserved by muslims and recovered by Renaissance thinkers.

THat was good and so very true.

Which is not to say that Catholics today are bad people -- Catholicism and its non literal take on the bible are among the more reasonable of the popular fantasies, even if they are against public health initiatives like contraceptives.

Ok good good. Now if I were to say something like this . In order to find the complete works of the prophets. One has to look at all the great religions of the world.
Whats your response to that.

That there are no religions I would define as "great"

Seriously though, what point are you trying to raise? I don't see a real gotcha there.

No one is trying to trick you . There is no gotha. Its about learning. Ok

Well, your question is essentially meaningless. There is no true list of prophets, millions have called themselves prophets throughout history, so it looks like your question is this:

how do you respond to this:
In order to read all the works of people who call themselves prophets or were so described by others, you have to read all the works of people who call themselves prophets or were so described by others.

That's not really a question, it's simply a tautology.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
The most interesting read to me is the Gospel of Judas. In it he claims that he did not betray Jesus and that he was doing as Jesus asked him to.

The text about Mary Magdalene that claim she was closer to Jesus than any other disciple would have never made it into the bible back then. A woman, not only equal to a man, but elevated above one ? Are you mad ?


It is very hard to get a complete idea of anything written in those times. There are lots of texts that were burned during various ages in history.

Also remember when this stuff was written.
Don't expect a man from 2000 years ago to explain creation with a paper on parallel universes and the big bang.

OK ok great . 1 question . Mary mag . Ya its short and incomplete . But what was your take on what was saved in the text. There is more.


My take on what was saved ?
I've read the exact manuscript of everything they have translated word for word.
There is no conspiracy here. Just a bunch of long dead people that wanted people to see things their way.

I'm a fan of Roman history so I read everything I can that concerns that era . There are several good translations done by independent scholars not associated with any church.
They don't put any slant on it, they are only concerned with the historical value.

Its kinda hard to believe . You didn't find the text extraordinary. I will paste some text if you have more please add. But lets discuss this so called ordinary text as you describe it.

The Gospel of Mary Magdalen
Second century Gnostic text
Alternative Religion/ Library

[The firs six pages of this gospel are missing; the text picks up in the middle of a discourse by Jesus]

will matter then be [destroyed] or not?" The Savior said, "All natures, all formations, all creatures exist in and with one another, and they will be resolved again into their own roots. For the nature of matter is resolved into the (roots) of its nature alone. He who has ears to hear, let him hear."

Peter said to him, "Since you have explained everything to us, tell us this also: What is the sin of the world?" , The Savior said, " There is no sin, but it is you who make sin when you do the things that are like the nature of adultery, which is called 'sin.' That is why the Good came into your midst, to the (essence) of every nature, in order to restore it to its root." Then he continued and said, "That is why you' [become sick] and die, for [. ..] of the one who [. ..He who] , understands, let him understand. [Matter gave birth to] a passion that has no equal, which proceeded from (something) contrary to nature. Then there arise a disturbance in the whole body. That is why I said to you, 'Be of good courage,' and if you are discouraged (be) encouraged in the presence of the different forms of nature. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.'

When the blessed one had said this, he greeted them all, saying, "Peace be with you. Receive my peace to yourselves. Beware that no one lead you astray, saying, 'Lo here!' or 'Lo' there!' For the Son of Man is within you. Follow after him! Those who seek him will find him. Go then and preach the gospel of the kingdom. Do not lay down any rules beyond what I appointed for you, and do not give a law like the lawgiver lest you be constrained by it." When he had said this, he departed.

But they were grieved. They wept greatly, saying, "How shall we go to the gentiles and preach the gospel of the kingdom of the Son of Man? If they did not spare him, how will they spare us?" Then Mary stood up, greeted them all, and said to her brethren, "Do not weep and do not grieve nor be irresolute, for his grace will be entirely with you and will protect you. But rather let us praise his greatness, for he has prepared us and made us into men." When Mary said this, she turned their hearts to the Good, and they began to discuss the words of the [Savior].

Peter said to Mary, 'Sister, I we know that the Savior loved you more than the rest of women. Tell us the words of the Savior which you remember - which you know (but) we do not, nor have we heard them." Mary answered and said, "What is hidden from you will proclaim to you." And she began to speak to them these words: "I," she said, " I saw the Lord in a vision and I said to him, 'Lord, I saw you today in a vision.' He answered and said to me, 'Blessed are you, that you did not waver at the sight of me. For where the mind is, there is the treasure. 'I said to him, 'Lord, now does he who sees the vision see it (through) the soul (or) through the spirit?' The Savior answered and said. 'He does not see through the soul nor through the spirit, but the mind which [is] between the two - that is [what] sees the vision and it is [. ..].' (pp. 11-14 missing)

"[. ..] it. And desire that, 'I did not see you descending, but now I see you ascending. Why do you lie, since you belong to me?' The soul answered and said, 'I saw you. You did not see me nor recognize me. I served you as a garment, and you did not know me.' When it had said this, it went away rejoicing greatly.

"Again it came to the third power, which is called ignorance. [It (the power)] questioned the soul saying, 'Where are you going? In wickedness are you bound. But you are bound; do not judge!' And the soul said, 'why do you judge me although I have not judged? I was bound though I have not bound. I was not recognized. But I have recognized that the All is being dissolved, both the earthly (things) and the heavenly.'

When the soul had overcome the third power, it went upwards and saw the fourth power, (which) took seven forms. The first form is darkness, the second desire, the third ignorance, the fourth is the excitement of death, the fifth is the kingdom of the flesh, the sixth is the foolish wisdom of flesh, the seventh is the wrathful wisdom. These are the seven [powers] of wrath. They ask the soul, 'Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?' The soul answered and said, 'What binds me has been slain, and what surrounds me has been overcome, and my desire has been ended, and ignorance has died. In a [world] I was released from a world, [and] in a type from a heavenly type, and (from) the fetter of oblivion which is transient. From this time on will I attain to the rest of the time, of the season, of the aeon, in silence.'

When Mary had said this, she fell silent, since it was to this point that the Savior had spoken with her. But Andrew answered and said to the brethren, "Say what you (wish to) say I about what she has said. I at least do not believe that the Savior said this. For certainly these teachings are strange ideas." Peter answered and spoke concerning these same things. He questioned them about the Savior: "Did he really speak with a woman without our knowledge (and) not openly? Are we to turn about and all listen to her? Did he prefer her to us?"

Then Mary wept and said to Peter, "My brother Peter, what do you think? Do you think that I thought this up myself in my heart, or that I am lying about the Savior?" Levi answered and said to Peter, "Peter, you have always been hot-tempered. Now I see you contend ing against the woman like the adversaries. But if the Savior made her worthy, who are you indeed to reject her? Surely the Savior knows her very well. That is why he loved her more than us. Rather let us be ashamed and put on the perfect man and acquire him for ourselves as he commanded us, and preach the gospel, not laying down any other rule or other law beyond what the Savior said. When [ ...] and they began to go forth [to] proclaim and to preach


 

thepd7

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2005
9,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: thepd7
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1


Or you haven't read the books ya claim are in the Bible

So apparently you know the word 'you', but willfully transpose it with 'ya'. Interesting.

Who gives man authority over man . None. These aren't my rules. I don't play in your game . I do as I please . Man has no hold on me .

God gives man authority over man. All the time. Pastors, emporers, presidents, etc. Not saying guys on the forum have authority over you but you are called by God to submit to certain authorities in your life.


No your giving them authority over you . God has nothing to do with it. Why would God give ya free choice only to take it away. Think on that.

YOU bought the lie man. Ya bought the lie.

Jesus said give to Ceaser what is Ceaser's. So, yes, God has everything to do with it.

I have free choice yes. I can choose not to obey God. It's a pretty stupid decision but I can. I in fact often do (big suprise, I'm a sinner). That doesn't mean I am not commanded to obey other humans.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: thepd7
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: thepd7
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1


Or you haven't read the books ya claim are in the Bible

So apparently you know the word 'you', but willfully transpose it with 'ya'. Interesting.

Who gives man authority over man . None. These aren't my rules. I don't play in your game . I do as I please . Man has no hold on me .

God gives man authority over man. All the time. Pastors, emporers, presidents, etc. Not saying guys on the forum have authority over you but you are called by God to submit to certain authorities in your life.


No your giving them authority over you . God has nothing to do with it. Why would God give ya free choice only to take it away. Think on that.

YOU bought the lie man. Ya bought the lie.

Jesus said give to Ceaser what is Ceaser's. So, yes, God has everything to do with it.

I have free choice yes. I can choose not to obey God. It's a pretty stupid decision but I can. I in fact often do (big suprise, I'm a sinner). That doesn't mean I am not commanded to obey other humans.

I was waiting on that . Since I used it here recently. It does say that but what else does it say . Give to GOD that which is GODS. Government does not truimph Gods laws. so pay your dam taxes.

But no way am I bound to kill in war . Or submit to government . Thats something the false church worked out with ceasar. Were does it say I am bound to the whims of others . NOWHERE in the Gospels. Just says I have to pay taxes in the land I live in . I bound by no leader. I spit on the criminals. I pay my taxes and that all they get from me.

I am bound by Gods laws . and thats all. I have to pay taxes . Iam bound to act responsiable in all things. Thats Gods law. I simply need to remain natural . Easier said than done. I know.

Lok at a child. Lets see you reman that innocent.

 

TreyRandom

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
3,346
0
76
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
I simply need to remain natural .

If that's the case, I call "Epic Fail".

EDIT: And for the record, I'm a follower of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1


Its kinda hard to believe . You didn't find the text extraordinary. I will paste some text if you have more please add. But lets discuss this so called ordinary text as you describe it.

The Gospel of Mary Magdalen
Second century Gnostic text
Alternative Religion/ Library

[The firs six pages of this gospel are missing; the text picks up in the middle of a discourse by Jesus]

The text is like any other writings of the time. There is nothing extraordinary about them. One thing you need to remember is this is not first hand accounts written by the people themselves. Many of them were illiterate . The gospel of Mary appeared over 150 years after Mary lived.

There is no conspiracy here to keep it secret. If you ever get time go to the library at Duke University in NC. They have a very nice library of religous studies where you can read the text just like they were found, that is if you can read hebrew and sanskrit. No one is trying to hide anything. What you see is what they have.

 

SsupernovaE

Golden Member
Dec 12, 2006
1,128
0
76
This thread is for anyone that wondered what goes through the head of a person as they descend into insanity.
 

thepd7

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2005
9,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1

I was waiting on that . Since I used it here recently. It does say that but what else does it say . Give to GOD that which is GODS. Government does not truimph Gods laws. so pay your dam taxes.

But no way am I bound to kill in war . Or submit to government . Thats something the false church worked out with ceasar. Were does it say I am bound to the whims of others . NOWHERE in the Gospels. Just says I have to pay taxes in the land I live in . I bound by no leader. I spit on the criminals. I pay my taxes and that all they get from me.

I am bound by Gods laws . and thats all. I have to pay taxes . Iam bound to act responsiable in all things. Thats Gods law. I simply need to remain natural . Easier said than done. I know.

Lok at a child. Lets see you reman that innocent.

I'm glad I didn't keep you long.

True, you are not bound to kill during war. You are bound to serve if there is a draft. You can help in other ways. You would not be breaking any of God's laws then.

What I am saying is that God's law requires you to submit to authority. In the Church and in Government.

God's law also requires you to obey your parents, which are humans (unless you are Jesus).

God's law also requires women to submit to their husbands.

God's law teaches submission OVER and OVER. Why do you think that is?
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
Originally posted by: SsupernovaE
This thread is for anyone that wondered what goes through the head of a person as they descend into insanity.

apparently so
 

Born2bwire

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2005
9,840
6
71
Fer Christ's sake, send this man a God damn dictionary and English textbook. I can't take it anymore.

You should have know problem with this.
Seriously, what is this shit?