• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Bloom Box: An Energy Breakthrough?

13Gigatons

13Gigatons

Diamond Member
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/02/18/60minutes/main6221135.shtml
For the past year and a half, several large California corporations have been secretly testing the "Bloom Box," a potentially revolutionary fuel-cell system. Confirming this for the first time, several of the companies report this system is a more efficient, clean, and cost effective way to get electricity than off the power grid.

John Donahoe, CEO of E-bay, confirms Bloom Boxes were installed at his corporate campus nine months ago. The company says the boxes already saved them over $100,000 in electricity bills. "It's been very successful thus far. [The Bloom Boxes] have done what they said they would do," says Donahoe. The five boxes are able to produce five times as much electricity as the 3,248 solar panels that E-bay installed on its campus roofs, says the CEO. "The footprint for Bloom is much more efficient," he tells Stahl.

Google, FedEx, Staples and Walmart are among the first 20 clients Bloom is confirming.

Stahl is the first journalist to be allowed into the Bloom Energy lab and factory where currently one box a day is built. The boxes create electricity by a chemical process that utilizes oxygen and fuel, but involves no combustion. Bloom's founder and CEO, K.R. Sridhar, insists all the materials in the box are cheap and available in abundance. Bloom says each large box - which can power about 100 homes - currently sells for $700-800,000. They hope within five to 10 years to roll out a smaller home version for about $3,000 a unit.
Click to expand...
 
common-sense-superpower.thumbnail.jpg


http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/411/

written by Ronald W. Garrison, December 05, 2009
In everything I've read so far about Bloom, they haven't said how efficient their fuel cell is. And be careful about claims of 70 % or 80 % which include cogeneration of heat--that's fine if you really have a good use for the heat. If not, then you cannot turn the extra heat into some form of energy with any reasonable efficiency--the temperature difference is far too small.

The real show-stopper for hydrogen, and fuel cells, is the round-trip energy efficiency. Batteries and supercapacitors are much more efficient, and I just don't see that gap closing. The other problems may be solvable, but I just don't see a way around the efficiency deficit. And I have the feeling I'm probably being a lot more kind to the technology than it deserves.
Click to expand...
Other Hyped Fuel cell companies
written by Juzer, December 27, 2009
Reminds me of Medis. Nasdaq MDTL. Same level of super secrecy, no mention of energy balances, price reality checks, etc. Just that it was going to revolutionize the portable power landscape. Final product was nothing spectacular. Doubt if they are still in business, but were able to raise and blow "hundreds of millions" too. Then there was MTI Micro. Final test is always the customer. Wait and see is best. Most of the hype is created by the VCs, but alas, Wall Street has no more oompf to pump up values on Hype. The criterion is performance. EPS, Dividends, Revenues. Basic rules of chemistry and physics do not change, and the simplistic scenario painted by non technical news reporters simply doesn't add up in an energy balance equation. Wait and see, wait and see.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
damn 700-800K a box and wow 400M for a startup

might end up being money well spent or China will just steal the tech
 
I guess we'll see what happens. I'd like to see it pan out but I'd like to see the hybrid car thing go further than where it's at too.
 
OK, so after 9 months, ebay has saved $100,000 in electricity. One unit costs $700-$800,000 dollars. Note "confirms Bloom Boxes were installed" indicating more than 1 was installed. that means at a minimum 2 were installed. So $1.4-$1.6 million bucks, it would take roughly 14-16 years to break even. Doesn't seem like viable solution.
 
JeffreyLebowski said:
OK, so after 9 months, ebay has saved $100,000 in electricity. One unit costs $700-$800,000 dollars. Note "confirms Bloom Boxes were installed" indicating more than 1 was installed. that means at a minimum 2 were installed. So $1.4-$1.6 million bucks, it would take roughly 14-16 years to break even. Doesn't seem like viable solution.
Click to expand...

the article clearly states 5 were installed.
 
JeffreyLebowski said:
OK, so after 9 months, ebay has saved $100,000 in electricity. One unit costs $700-$800,000 dollars. Note "confirms Bloom Boxes were installed" indicating more than 1 was installed. that means at a minimum 2 were installed. So $1.4-$1.6 million bucks, it would take roughly 14-16 years to break even. Doesn't seem like viable solution.
Click to expand...

They actually bought 5 of them, so $4 million invested to save $100,000 worth of electricity. :awe:
 
JeffreyLebowski said:
OK, so after 9 months, ebay has saved $100,000 in electricity. One unit costs $700-$800,000 dollars. Note "confirms Bloom Boxes were installed" indicating more than 1 was installed. that means at a minimum 2 were installed. So $1.4-$1.6 million bucks, it would take roughly 14-16 years to break even. Doesn't seem like viable solution.
Click to expand...

Not to defend Bloom, but we don't know if what other electricity sources they're using. There could be additional sources they could shut off and utilize Bloom with. We don't know all the variables here.
 
RagingBITCH said:
Not to defend Bloom, but we don't know if what other electricity sources they're using. There could be additional sources they could shut off and utilize Bloom with. We don't know all the variables here.
Click to expand...

I didn't read the whole article just the part that was quoted, so it doesn't matter what they used, they used something. If they saved $100,000 in nine months but had 5 units running. They didn't save shit. So my estimate of 14-16 years to pay off the intitial investment needs to be multiplied by 5. so roughly 75 years. I doubt the units will last 75 years. That's just to break even.
 
smells like bullshit, I don't believe it for a second.. Soon they'll be telling us that it works off the principle of cold fusion or some crap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top