Atomic Playboy
Lifer
- Feb 6, 2007
- 16,432
- 1
- 81
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
It seems pretty cut and dry that naming a religious text as an official state book could be described as making a law respecting an establishment of religion. I'm an agnostic atheist and I couldn't care less if my state made the Bible the state book (no book has had a more profound impact on Western culture over the past millennium), but it's ridiculously easy to challenge the Constitutionality of such a measure, so it's an exercise in futility. Why bother?
It seems pretty cut and dry that naming a religious text as an official state book could be described as making a law respecting an establishment of religion. I'm an agnostic atheist and I couldn't care less if my state made the Bible the state book (no book has had a more profound impact on Western culture over the past millennium), but it's ridiculously easy to challenge the Constitutionality of such a measure, so it's an exercise in futility. Why bother?