The best C++ compiler out there?

dezell123

Banned
Dec 14, 2000
554
0
0
uh,I searched download.com,and couldnt find it there. Could anybody else tell me where to find it?


Or is there a better one then Borland?
 

Zzzt

Member
Sep 8, 2000
164
0
0
According to my C++ teacher, Borland has a problem with numbers over 32,xxx,xxx. MS has the same problem, but at something like 7xx,xxx,xxx. Other than that, they seem to be the same.
 

GoldenBear

Banned
Mar 2, 2000
6,843
2
0
When you declare an "int" in C++ the limit is at 32767, while a "long int" or "double" would be..longer, not sure exactly how much longer though, but there still is a limit.
 

DeeK

Senior member
Mar 25, 2000
700
0
0
The free Borland compiler is crap. It does absolutely squat for optimizations. I've tried compiling LAME (the MP3 encoder) with the Borland free compiler, mingw (gcc for windows) and DJGPP (gcc for DOS), and the mingw and DJGPP executables were neck-and-neck in terms of speed, where the Borland-generated .exe was at least a factor of five slower. Avoid, avoid, avoid the Borland compiler. Try Cygwin or mingw.
 

dezell123

Banned
Dec 14, 2000
554
0
0
so,in your opinion guys,which is the best? YOu say Borland sucks..(free one)..so..which one is good?
 

Macaw

Member
Mar 1, 2000
159
0
0
If you want to try something a bit more exciting, try downloading a C# (pronounced "C-Sharp") compiler from GotDotNet.com.

If you just want to check out the language, check out the QuickStart tutorials on that very site.

I'm a long-time Delphi (since version 1) and C++ (for about 10 years) programmer and I really like the C# language.
 

Insomnium

Senior member
Aug 8, 2000
644
0
0
Nothing out there beats MSVC++ 6.0, but if you want the best free compiler, then you have to go with DJGPP. DJGPP is simply the best free compiler/development system out there. If you remember, Carmack used it to develop the original Quake. Go to their site, pick your packages, install, and get coding:cool: