Clarke's book was delayed for months by the White House, itself!Originally posted by: irwincur
Who cares about the timing. Do you think the timing of Clark's book and the one month delay of the 911 Commission was suspect? How about the timing of the two other books that happened to be released at the same time as the people testifying - all because of 911 Commission delays and bumps on the publishing schedules? How about the timing of the 911 Commission itself - is the best time to reveal this information months before an election, or would it have been more wise to wait until after the election?
The timing does matter. This goes to show the political maneuvers this administration has pulled multiple times. (See my post just above.) And, if this is a felony, why haven't felony charges been filed? It's been over 8 months since the investigation began.Quit spinning the story with the lame counter argument or 'the timing is odd'. Does not matter, the act happened, and it is a felony. I don't care if this happend five years ago and came out the day before the election - there is still the crime to be discussed. Crying about the timing is simply an attempt to push this away long enough for it to fall off of the face of the planet. Maybe Berger should have considered the consequences to himself and possibly his party (and his boss Billy) when he was making love to the documents (that implicate him in the eight years Clinton spent avoiding Al Queda) that he stuffed down his pant.
There have been reports the documents were no longer considered classified. Also, Berger didn't lose them. He returned the handwritten notes and said he had discarded the copies of the documents he had.THE F-ING FACT IS THAT HE TOOK CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AND EVEN 'LOST' SOME. THIS IS A MAJOR CRIME, REGARDLESS OF THE F-ING TIMING OF THE RELEASE. Did you also ever take a moment to consider that most FBI investigations are not public until they are near a decision on penalties and they are discussing the issue with the Justice Department. On matters of National security I would not doubt the FBI keeping hush hush on this. In my opinion, this is one slip up too many, Berger should be hanged, and his boss Bill who sent him belongs in prison with his brother.
Originally posted by: conjur
I guess you're ignoring the outcry over the following scandals and investigations against members of the Bush administration, including Bush himself:Originally posted by: Chris A
Bing Bing Bing... Nail on the head... Could you imagine the outcry if it was Condi Rice that had done this???Originally posted by: Turgon
It's sad and pathetic that the democrats are concerned with the politics of the issue rather than the despicable act itself. This is a serious situation.
Medicare cost coverup
Energy Task Force/Enron
Abu Ghraib/Torture Memo
Illegal Campaign Contributions for Texas Redistricting
Halliburton bribes
CIA operative leak
Then you're one in a million. Every other Bush supporter has dismissed them, apologized for them, or ignored them.Originally posted by: Chris A
I have not ignored any of that or defended any of that.Originally posted by: conjur
I guess you're ignoring the outcry over the following scandals and investigations against members of the Bush administration, including Bush himself:Originally posted by: Chris A
Bing Bing Bing... Nail on the head... Could you imagine the outcry if it was Condi Rice that had done this???Originally posted by: Turgon
It's sad and pathetic that the democrats are concerned with the politics of the issue rather than the despicable act itself. This is a serious situation.
Medicare cost coverup
Energy Task Force/Enron
Abu Ghraib/Torture Memo
Illegal Campaign Contributions for Texas Redistricting
Halliburton bribes
CIA operative leak
You've already convicted him. The investigation has been on-going for over eight months and no claims of theft, felonies, burglaries, etc. have been made. Berger has not been charged with anything. Yes, his actions were suspicious but let's await the findings of the investigation.Keep the focus though, this thread is about one crime.. Start another about those if you care. I have concerns that a senior member of the clinton administration stole top secret papers and tried to cover it up.... Now when it hits the news it must have been a Republican smoke screen...
:roll:
Originally posted by: Chris A
I have not ignored any of that or defended any of that.. Keep the focus though, this thread is about one crime.. Start another about those if you care. I have concerns that a senior member of the clinton administration stole top secret papers and tried to cover it up.... Now when it hits the news it must have been a Republican smoke screen...
:roll:
Originally posted by: Gaard
It's probably irrelevant, but the commission says that they have all of the documents that Cheney is alleged to have taken. That might not be worded correctly...they have all of the info that those documents had in them. Oh forget it, I can't remember his exact words. It was on Lou Dobbs a few hour ago...look it up.![]()
Originally posted by: Turgon
It's sad and pathetic that the democrats are concerned with the politics of the issue rather than the despicable act itself. This is a serious situation.
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
Originally posted by: Turgon
It's sad and pathetic that the democrats are concerned with the politics of the issue rather than the despicable act itself. This is a serious situation.
Welcome to the world of the mis-informed, mis-guided Democratic person.
So, where's the threat to national security? IF Berger is guilty of any type of crime, then charges will be filed, and rightfully so.Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Gaard
It's probably irrelevant, but the commission says that they have all of the documents that Cheney is alleged to have taken. That might not be worded correctly...they have all of the info that those documents had in them. Oh forget it, I can't remember his exact words. It was on Lou Dobbs a few hour ago...look it up.![]()
Here it is. I knew I wasn't crazy.
link
DOBBS: Let me ask you, not necessarily directly on point, but certainly related. Sandy Berger, the former head of the national security -- national security adviser under the Clinton administration, accused of, and admitting taking classified documents from the National Archives, those notes, whether copies or originals still unclear. Did the commission review that material, to what -- can you shed any light on what happened there? Slade Gorton, first.
GORTON: Well, we can't shed any light on exactly what happened there and on Sandy Berger's troubles with the Justice Department and the Archives. What we can say unequivocally is we had all of that information. We have every one of those documents. All of them have -- are infused in and are a part of our report.
DOBBS: So the commission was denied no information as a result of whatever Sandy Berger did or did not do at the National Archives?
GORTON: That's precisely correct.
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Focus is on a single document written by Richard Clarke ?
Berger Probe Focuses on Terror Plot Docs
Saturday, July 24, 2004
The Justice Department investigation into whether Sandy Berger (search) copied and stole terrorism documents from the National Archives is focused on one highly classified report about the Clinton administration's response to a plot to bomb Los Angeles International Airport, FOX News has learned.
Sources familiar with the investigation said that Berger, Clinton's former national security adviser, took numerous copies and drafts of that report, and other related documents.
The report may be of interest to investigators because of handwritten margin notes on some of the copies, which may be attributable to Berger, sources said. Since the documents themselves have not been released, the specifics of those notes were not immediately clear.
However, a government official said the investigation will likely lead to the declassification of the report.
The terror scheme in question is the millennium bomb plot , which was planned for Jan. 1, 2000.
Algerian national Ahmed Ressam was convicted in April 2001 of terrorist conspiracy and eight other charges related to the plot. He was arrested in Port Angeles, Wash., in December 1999 after crossing the Canada-U.S. border with a car allegedly with bomb-making material. Authorities said Ressam, 33, had ties to Usama bin Laden .
Seattle's millennial celebrations, and those in several other cities, were canceled as a result of Ressam's arrest.
Prosecutors say statements from Ressam prompted the government to seek the July 2001 arrest of Abu Doha , described as a London Al Qaeda operative. Doha has been charged with conspiring with Ressam to blow up Los Angeles International, but also is accused in other terrorist plots around the world.
Ressam's testimony also helped convict Mokhtar Haouari, 32, of supplying fake identification and cash for the millennium bomb plot. Haouari was sentenced to 24 years in prison.
The documents in the Berger case originated with the White House National Security Council and dealt with actions and recommendations stemming from the threat in 1999 of a terrorist attack during the 2000 millennium celebrations. The documents, written by former National Security Council aide and counterterrorism adviser Richard Clarke , were classified at the extremely sensitive "codeword" level, which is above the classification level for the nation's nuclear secrets.
Berger is being investigated after witnesses at the National Archives said they saw him copying notes from the copied documents, and stuffing some of the copies in his shirt and socks.
Berger was reviewing the materials in 2003 to help determine which Clinton administration documents to provide to the independent commission probing the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Berger claims he made "an honest mistake" but was innocent of any wrongdoing, saying he must have discarded the missing documents.
The House Government Reform Committee said this week that it will look into the allegations.
"At best, we're looking at tremendously irresponsible handling of highly classified information," said committee Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said the questions the committee should answer include whether there was any attempt to cover up embarrassing materials, what happened to documents removed by Berger that are still missing and what security risk the entire episode poses.
The White House acknowledged that its lawyers were notified months ago about the Berger investigation. The chairman of the Democratic National Committee filed a Freedom of Information request for any correspondence about the probe between the Justice Department and the White House.
Meanwhile, the Sept. 11 commission said it was able to get all the information it needed despite the Berger snafu.
Panel Chairman Thomas Kean told reporters Friday that he and Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton were told by Bush administration officials about six months ago that Berger was the subject of a the Justice investigation.
Kean said the commission has been assured that they were able to obtain copies of each document that was apparently lost. If those lost documents had written notations on them from Clinton or others, they would have been included in those copies, Kean said.
Berger stepped down as an informal foreign policy adviser to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry after the investigation hit the headlines earlier this week. Democrats accused the Bush administration of leaking the news for political gain and to distract attention from the Thursday release of the Sept. 11 commission report. Administration officials have denied those claims.
FOX News' Anna Stolley and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would appear that the Clarke nutsuckers need to get ready to defend their boy
from this typical election year crap.![]()
Originally posted by: conjur
So, where's the threat to national security? IF Berger is guilty of any type of crime, then charges will be filed, and rightfully so.Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Gaard
It's probably irrelevant, but the commission says that they have all of the documents that Cheney is alleged to have taken. That might not be worded correctly...they have all of the info that those documents had in them. Oh forget it, I can't remember his exact words. It was on Lou Dobbs a few hour ago...look it up.![]()
Here it is. I knew I wasn't crazy.
link
DOBBS: Let me ask you, not necessarily directly on point, but certainly related. Sandy Berger, the former head of the national security -- national security adviser under the Clinton administration, accused of, and admitting taking classified documents from the National Archives, those notes, whether copies or originals still unclear. Did the commission review that material, to what -- can you shed any light on what happened there? Slade Gorton, first.
GORTON: Well, we can't shed any light on exactly what happened there and on Sandy Berger's troubles with the Justice Department and the Archives. What we can say unequivocally is we had all of that information. We have every one of those documents. All of them have -- are infused in and are a part of our report.
DOBBS: So the commission was denied no information as a result of whatever Sandy Berger did or did not do at the National Archives?
GORTON: That's precisely correct.
Until then, this thread's title stands.
Originally posted by: Willian
Originally posted by: conjur
So, where's the threat to national security? IF Berger is guilty of any type of crime, then charges will be filed, and rightfully so.Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Gaard
It's probably irrelevant, but the commission says that they have all of the documents that Cheney is alleged to have taken. That might not be worded correctly...they have all of the info that those documents had in them. Oh forget it, I can't remember his exact words. It was on Lou Dobbs a few hour ago...look it up.![]()
Here it is. I knew I wasn't crazy.
link
DOBBS: Let me ask you, not necessarily directly on point, but certainly related. Sandy Berger, the former head of the national security -- national security adviser under the Clinton administration, accused of, and admitting taking classified documents from the National Archives, those notes, whether copies or originals still unclear. Did the commission review that material, to what -- can you shed any light on what happened there? Slade Gorton, first.
GORTON: Well, we can't shed any light on exactly what happened there and on Sandy Berger's troubles with the Justice Department and the Archives. What we can say unequivocally is we had all of that information. We have every one of those documents. All of them have -- are infused in and are a part of our report.
DOBBS: So the commission was denied no information as a result of whatever Sandy Berger did or did not do at the National Archives?
GORTON: That's precisely correct.
Until then, this thread's title stands.
CNN BAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !, Yea now theres a non-bias site.....LMAO!
Any idea which banned troll he used to be?Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Willian
CNN BAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !, Yea now theres a non-bias site.....LMAO!
It's a frick'n transcript, you jackass.
How do you figure, Einstein? Is Clarke the subject of an investigation?Originally posted by: Ozoned
It would appear that the Clarke nutsuckers need to get ready to defend their boy
from this typical election year crap.![]()
More likely an RNC shill or some reject from hannity.com.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Any idea which banned troll he used to be?Originally posted by: Gaard
It's a frick'n transcript, you jackass.Originally posted by: Willian
CNN BAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !, Yea now theres a non-bias site.....LMAO!
Originally posted by: conjur
[sucking noise]How do you figure, Einstein? Is Clarke the subject of an investigation?Originally posted by: Ozoned
It would appear that the Clarke nutsuckers need to get ready to defend their boy
from this typical election year crap.![]()
No.[/sucking noise]
Geez...you Bush-God fanbois will stretch anything beyond anyone's wildest imagination.
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Any idea which banned troll he used to be?Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Willian
CNN BAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !, Yea now theres a non-bias site.....LMAO!
It's a frick'n transcript, you jackass.
Originally posted by: Willian
CNN BAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !, Yea now theres a non-bias site.....LMAO!
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Chris A
I have not ignored any of that or defended any of that.. Keep the focus though, this thread is about one crime.. Start another about those if you care. I have concerns that a senior member of the clinton administration stole top secret papers and tried to cover it up.... Now when it hits the news it must have been a Republican smoke screen...
:roll:
link please
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Chris A
I have not ignored any of that or defended any of that.. Keep the focus though, this thread is about one crime.. Start another about those if you care. I have concerns that a senior member of the clinton administration stole top secret papers and tried to cover it up.... Now when it hits the news it must have been a Republican smoke screen...
:roll:
link please
