- Apr 24, 2001
- 5,974
- 471
- 126
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6912023.stm
Despite the explanations, I still don't understand why this is considered more robust than a solid-state silicon chip...?!
They mention two aspects: heat build-up and energy consumption, but isn't "wear and tear" inherent to the nature of mechanical computers?
Despite the explanations, I still don't understand why this is considered more robust than a solid-state silicon chip...?!
They mention two aspects: heat build-up and energy consumption, but isn't "wear and tear" inherent to the nature of mechanical computers?