The Babbage "Difference engine" returns

AnitaPeterson

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
5,974
471
126
LOL, the lack of response makes me think this should've gone to General Hardware...

I can imagine a conversation 10 years from now:
"so, Tom, how's Duke Nukem Forever running on your HP Babbage Mk3?"
"pretty good, but man, it needs a lube job every three months, or else I start losing frames!"
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
As far as wear and tear... on tiny tiny little things, because there are fewer defects, they don't wear nearly as rapidly as larger things. i.e. sand on a beach doesn't wear out rapidly. Rocks on a beach wear out relatively rapidly (compared to the sand; we're talking about a long time though)

I read that article and was left somewhat perplexed. What's the point of packing more transistors into a smaller and smaller space? The purpose isn't to make it smaller - the purpose is... SPEED! Why would you admit that what you're creating is slower, but you'll be able to make more of them?

The other argument seemed to be that the nano technology would create chips that could be used in more environments. Sure, that part might be true. But a lot of the article seemed to focus on "hey, give us attention and continue to fund our research because we're going to make it sound really important."
 

zerocool1

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2002
4,486
1
81
femaven.blogspot.com
Originally posted by: DrPizza
But a lot of the article seemed to focus on "hey, give us attention and continue to fund our research because we're going to make it sound really important."

nanotech it seems to me has a lot of this going on.