• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Atlantic predicted NSA scandal in 1967

Status
Not open for further replies.

mmntech

Lifer
More specifically, American lawyer Arther R. Miller. He has specialized in civil procedure and wrote several books on government and data mining. One of his articles appeared in The Atlantic in 1967. He predicts the implications of the NSA scandal with quite accurately in an era when ARPANET was still on the drawing board. Definitely worth a read if you want to learn how this data mining business evolved.
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/the-national-data-center-and-personal-privacy/1/#mmGal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_R._Miller

Notes for lazies
-Information gathering by federal data centres useful but ripe for abuse
-Humans make mistakes, no safeguards to ensure accuracy of the data.
-Inaccurate or incomplete data files could be devastating to individuals. Gives example of civil rights activist who has arrested and jailed but pardoned on appeal. Still flagged as arrested and detained. This could prevent them from getting federal jobs, etc.
-No controls over who can and when they can access data. Data vulnerable to overzealous officials.
-Private/corporate data centres are also vulnerable to wiretapping by government and unscrupulous private entities.

He provides several suggestions on how government should respond to ensure the privacy of American citizens is protected.
-Create an independent government agency well outside the hands of intelligence officials to manage this data. They become the gatekeepers to the data base.
-Lock all data out except that which is relevant and to only those who require it. If an army doctor needs a medical file, only that doctor has the key to access it.
-Enable security devices to prevent intelligence officials and unscrupulous private entities from making unauthorized access to public and private data bases.
-Give citizens the power to view their entire file and provide them the tools to address and correct any inaccuracies.
-Pass legislation to restricting the types of data that can be taken from non-federal systems.
 
There's ultimately going to be so much data compiled that a single leak, a single good hack could release vast amounts of data about people in one go. In this way, protecting it is a bit like that adage the gov loves to use about terrorism: They have to be successful just once, but we do every time. Well it's the same with hackers or leakers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top