The ATi Radeon 9600 would be equal to nVidia's...

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
A bit slower than a gf4 ti4200 (unless you crank up AA/AF and drop to unplayable frame rates, a textbook moot point).
 

MrCodeDude

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
13,674
1
76
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
A bit slower than a gf4 ti4200 (unless you crank up AA/AF and drop to unplayable frame rates, a textbook moot point).
Holy, really?
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
A bit slower than a gf4 ti4200 (unless you crank up AA/AF and drop to unplayable frame rates, a textbook moot point).

well if we take to that account then a lot of cards are like that...but the difference is when you crank up AA/AF the g4 takes a nosedive whereas the 9600pro still delivers ^_^
 

Dantzig

Golden Member
Oct 11, 1999
1,301
0
0
It depends on the benchmark, but somewhere in the Ti4200, Ti4400, FX 5600 range for most of today's games. It's just clocked too low. The 9600 Pro and XT perform much, much better.

My 9600 was slower than the 8500 it replaced until I overclocked it from 325/400 to 425/540, then it finally put out some decent performance. I still wasn't happy though, so I have a 9800 Pro on the way.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
A bit slower than a gf4 ti4200 (unless you crank up AA/AF and drop to unplayable frame rates, a textbook moot point).

well if we take to that account then a lot of cards are like that...but the difference is when you crank up AA/AF the g4 takes a nosedive whereas the 9600pro still delivers ^_^
Yes, but he's asking about the non-pro. The 9600pro is better, but it's more expensive than the ti4200.
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Like the others have said, the 4200, the 5600, or the 5700, depending on the application.