See this is something I find hilarious, bc I use AI to create/revise recipes all the time, including baking. If they'd actually verify the recipes in the book they'd be fine.
Oh sure, I use AI in a lot of food-related activities successfully:
1. Calculating macros for recipes
2. Guesstimating macros from a photo
3. Generating shopping lists from recipes I pick
4. Creating graphical enhancements for my smarthome system's meal-planning tool (see below)
5. Adjusting recipe yield (i.e. half or double)
6. Doing baker's math (ex. sourdough hydration percentages...I have math dyslexia lol)
7. Calculating schedules via timers & alarms (no-knead, sourdough, dehydration, sous-vide, long smoke jobs, etc.)
And so on...but creating a fake picture to represent a fake, untested recipe in an unvetted book is just straight-up
lying lol. I mean, I do a LOT of AI-enhanced photography, so there IS a place for it! For example, I have a custom smarthome system that has a meal-prep system on a 50" TV at my dinner table (4K is $178 at Walmart, haha!) & I use Nano Banana Pro to turn cell phone pics into restaurant-quality images for me to scroll through when I'm doing my meal-planning, My amazing iPhone pic:
Prompt:
Convert this image into dark-mode food photography. Moody lighting, soft directional shadows, high contrast, rich colors, restaurant plating, 50mm shallow depth, 45-degree view, matte texture, minimal highlights, similar style to high-end recipe galleries.
Et voila:
