The 2 cheapest phones with 5G service

Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,850
146
You shouldn't buy any phone for 5G yet (meaning you'd be better off buying a similarly priced non 5G phone that would be better in other ways).
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,120
911
126
You shouldn't buy any phone for 5G yet (meaning you'd be better off buying a similarly priced non 5G phone that would be better in other ways).
Not if you have 5G in your area. I just got my wife an iPhone 12, and 5G is glorious!!! My current phone is barely a year old, and I'm trying to move, so no 5G phone for me yet.
 

bracknelson

Junior Member
Oct 28, 2020
8
1
16
Not if you have 5G in your area. I just got my wife an iPhone 12, and 5G is glorious!!! My current phone is barely a year old, and I'm trying to move, so no 5G phone for me yet.
So what is the experience with 5g gadget, I mean is it giving a better experience than before? as I didn't use it till now but I am thinking to have 5g.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,120
911
126
So what is the experience with 5g gadget, I mean is it giving a better experience than before? as I didn't use it till now but I am thinking to have 5g.

I only used it for a half hour or so, but it was light years faster than my iPhone 11. We don’t have 5G at home yet, so I haven’t been able to play with it more. LTE has become horrible at home, so we use WiFi more.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,850
146
Not if you have 5G in your area. I just got my wife an iPhone 12, and 5G is glorious!!! My current phone is barely a year old, and I'm trying to move, so no 5G phone for me yet.

I have had a 5G phone in a major metro area since March. There were times when the connection and speeds were worse than 4G (I actually had to tell my phone to use 4G instead a couple of times even). I didn't buy the phone because it was 5G and I don't think its worth spending new phone money just to get 5G.

5G has benefits, but a fair amount of those reasons is less about the tech and more simply due to most people still being on 4G and therefore 5G being less congested. If you were on AT&T the "5G" you got wasn't 5G at all as they pulled the same shenanigans they did in the LTE/4G era and just called their existing 4G as 5G when it wasn't any different.

mmWave is interesting but inherently limited, but we'll see how that evolves. It'll be awhile before that's specifically worth seeking out though.

Which, now there's not really a downside since newer SoCs will have it and have it integrated (think even the lowend Qualcomm ones will this year), so if you're getting a new phone sure go for it. My point was more that if you had an iPhone 11 or non 5G high end Android phone I wouldn't say go out and buy a 12 or a new Android phone just for 5G as it really isn't worth it. Most carriers will throttle you after awhile so its not like the faster download speeds will really help you much.

Which I think now even many MVNOs are offering 5G with no extra stuff needed, but I believe Verizon was charging more for 5G.

I think 5G might still come with battery life drawbacks as it requires more antenna. But more efficient processors and the move to larger batteries helped offset that.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,120
911
126
I have had a 5G phone in a major metro area since March. There were times when the connection and speeds were worse than 4G (I actually had to tell my phone to use 4G instead a couple of times even). I didn't buy the phone because it was 5G and I don't think its worth spending new phone money just to get 5G.

5G has benefits, but a fair amount of those reasons is less about the tech and more simply due to most people still being on 4G and therefore 5G being less congested. If you were on AT&T the "5G" you got wasn't 5G at all as they pulled the same shenanigans they did in the LTE/4G era and just called their existing 4G as 5G when it wasn't any different.

mmWave is interesting but inherently limited, but we'll see how that evolves. It'll be awhile before that's specifically worth seeking out though.

Which, now there's not really a downside since newer SoCs will have it and have it integrated (think even the lowend Qualcomm ones will this year), so if you're getting a new phone sure go for it. My point was more that if you had an iPhone 11 or non 5G high end Android phone I wouldn't say go out and buy a 12 or a new Android phone just for 5G as it really isn't worth it. Most carriers will throttle you after awhile so its not like the faster download speeds will really help you much.

Which I think now even many MVNOs are offering 5G with no extra stuff needed, but I believe Verizon was charging more for 5G.

I think 5G might still come with battery life drawbacks as it requires more antenna. But more efficient processors and the move to larger batteries helped offset that.
I am on at&t, and they have real 5G now. 5Ge is what their 4G LTE improvement is called now. They changed the name after they were caught in their lie.
I'm not upgrading my phone yet though. I'm waiting to see what Apple does with the iPhone 13, and to see who has the best 5G coverage in my towns at that time. The wife needed a new phone, as her iPhone 6 couldn't take anymore. I made it her Xmas/ birthday present.
 

Ravynmagi

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2007
3,102
24
81
Hopefully I've digested what I've read and heard about 5G correctly, please correct any mistakes.

But a surprise to nobody, the carriers have made a mess of things by branding everything 5G.

AT&T shamelessly just started labeling their 4G network as 5Ge even though it has nothing to do with 5G.

AT&T and Verizon using Dynamic Spectrum Sharing to push 5G out over their existing 4G spectrum. AT&T had been doing this in some areas since last summer it looks like. And Verizon just did it to the entire country when the 5G iPhone 12 launched. Carriers obviously want hide how limited their real 5G networks are. 5G over DSS, is technically 5G, you get the lower latency, but because it's on the 4G spectrum, you are only going to get 4G speeds. 4G LTE and 5G DSS are running off the same towers on the same spectrum. And if there is congestion, the 4G LTE takes priority over the 5G DSS. So if your phone is connected at "5G" you may get slower speeds than someone on an LTE phone.

This is why people have been recommending turning off your 5G if you can, because it just eat more power, and will likely be slower at times. The lower latency not going to have any real benefit to most users at the time.

The real 5G networks, Sub-6 and mmWave, still have a tiny foot print across the country, and is deployed mostly in population dense areas, like sports stadiums and airports. Pretty much anywhere you don't want to be during a pandemic.

At this point I suspect pretty much any 5G phone will show the 5G symbol lighting on in the status bar. But for the vast majority of us, that is almost certainly the 5G DSS running over the 4G network and is no faster and possibly slower.




However back to the original poster's request. I don't want to be a total debbie downer. 5G is coming and maybe he/she is already super lucky has the sub-6 or mmwave coverage.

I probably wouldn't consider the LG phone, that's an older phone, the SoC didn't have 5G integrated at the time, so it's an add-on chip that's definitely less power efficient. It shipped with Android 9 and I don't think LG is that good at updating phones. So this is feeling a tab obsolete already.

The Samsung A71 5G is a good choice. It has the Snapdragon 765G SoC which is designed specifically for what you are looking for, budget 5G phones. So I'd focus on phones with that. Also the Snapdragon 690 is very similar, but the graphics processor won't be as fast.

Pixel 4a 5G is another good budget phone to consider. One Plus Nord N10 if you want to go a little cheaper (it's got the Snapdragon 690).
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
recently my friend bought a 5g smartphone, but there is no 5g network in out area. 5g is useless.

5G is useless... because your friend can't try it?

That's like saying Ferraris aren't fast because you don't have one in your garage. You can certainly complain about the lack of access, but it doesn't say anything about the quality of the product.