Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
This is by far the most idiotic thread i have ever read on this forum. (but i haven't been here that long so don't feel too bad about it)
They are getting rid of their waste and making money out of it and you are here to tell us that they do it because they're "green"?
Saving money is not the same as making money. As a bonus they are doing a small part in reducing crude oil dependence as well as lowering their enviromental impact through less emissions.
I fail to see how anyone could construe this as "bad" thing. It seems like a win/win deal all around. Hate on the organization all you want, but at least give them credit for small steps in the right direction.
Nope, never ever ever give them credit for anything - it's all just a ploy - they don't really mean it. They are just looking to line their pockets with gold and fill their pools with wads of cash! :roll:
Boy I get sick of people always hating on a company - just because they are a big corporation. Why not try to give credit where credit is due? Without doing that you look like nothing but a bunch of spoiled whiners.
What? What? What? Can you please list the posters who were attacking McDonald's because they are large?
And can you also please demonstrate impartial objectivity of the kind you desire by criticizing McDonald's just a bit. I get sick of people always loving on a company just because they are large. Without doing that you look like a sycophant.
I don't love McDonalds but as I stated - I'll give them credit when credit is due. This is one such case where credit is due. Yet here we have people hating on McDonalds. Because they are large? Maybe - some people are like that. How else do you explain it? Hell, I'm up for ideas but we've seen it before and I'll bet dollars to donuts that it's the anti-corporate nerve being struck.
Well well, a reasonably worded post. I don't know if I would exactly use the word credit because, of course, McDonald's has certainly taken their own interests into account. But what is good for McDonald's in this case I would thing is also good in a general sense and enlightened self interest always works out that way, in my opinion. The rub is always in how enlightened something really is.
But I can understand why people don't like McDonald's because they have traditionally served food that is probably not very good for you. It is wrong, no, to make money ruining people's health? So I think most people have an issue with McDonald's not so much because they are large as because of their food quality, from a health point of view, and the fact that they are large is relevant only in the sense that their largeness makes they known to all. They are a famous example of food isn't too healthy sold to millions who are relatively poor and gravitate to meals that are easy to come by. I think the anti-corporate 'nerve' comes from the fact that they have the financial power via corporation to spread themselves everywhere, and as with other large corporations, to lobby successfully for laws that favor them. Everybody likes a bargain but it takes real knowledge and self control to avoid eating at places like this for your long term health. Poor people have free will, like everybody else, except that statistically they almost always chose what is cheaper now over what might be healthier long term. At any rate is always nice to see somebody asking questions. There is no doubt in my mind that when it comes to corporations there are folk all over the spectrum with much of both ends of it being quite insane.
There are plenty of threads to discuss the right or wrongness of selling things that ruin people's health - or heck start one. This thread happens to be about a corporation taking a step in the right direction by recycling their used oil which gets processed into biodiesel. As with most any profitable corporation, the things they do may not be altruistic - they should be credited with finding something to do with their waste that is positive.
I was not and was not interested in discussing the right or wrong of selling things that ruin people's health. I was interested in relating that fact to the question you raised as to why corporations are not always credited with achievements in other areas that may be positive. We do not, generally speaking, I am never sure about you, credit a mother who keeps a clean house with being a good homemaker if she has also murdered her kids.