That evil mega-corp McDonalds goes green?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,227
6,634
126
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
This is by far the most idiotic thread i have ever read on this forum. (but i haven't been here that long so don't feel too bad about it)

They are getting rid of their waste and making money out of it and you are here to tell us that they do it because they're "green"?

Saving money is not the same as making money. As a bonus they are doing a small part in reducing crude oil dependence as well as lowering their enviromental impact through less emissions.

I fail to see how anyone could construe this as "bad" thing. It seems like a win/win deal all around. Hate on the organization all you want, but at least give them credit for small steps in the right direction.

Nope, never ever ever give them credit for anything - it's all just a ploy - they don't really mean it. They are just looking to line their pockets with gold and fill their pools with wads of cash! :roll:

Boy I get sick of people always hating on a company - just because they are a big corporation. Why not try to give credit where credit is due? Without doing that you look like nothing but a bunch of spoiled whiners.

What? What? What? Can you please list the posters who were attacking McDonald's because they are large?

And can you also please demonstrate impartial objectivity of the kind you desire by criticizing McDonald's just a bit. I get sick of people always loving on a company just because they are large. Without doing that you look like a sycophant.

I don't love McDonalds but as I stated - I'll give them credit when credit is due. This is one such case where credit is due. Yet here we have people hating on McDonalds. Because they are large? Maybe - some people are like that. How else do you explain it? Hell, I'm up for ideas but we've seen it before and I'll bet dollars to donuts that it's the anti-corporate nerve being struck.

Well well, a reasonably worded post. I don't know if I would exactly use the word credit because, of course, McDonald's has certainly taken their own interests into account. But what is good for McDonald's in this case I would thing is also good in a general sense and enlightened self interest always works out that way, in my opinion. The rub is always in how enlightened something really is.

But I can understand why people don't like McDonald's because they have traditionally served food that is probably not very good for you. It is wrong, no, to make money ruining people's health? So I think most people have an issue with McDonald's not so much because they are large as because of their food quality, from a health point of view, and the fact that they are large is relevant only in the sense that their largeness makes they known to all. They are a famous example of food isn't too healthy sold to millions who are relatively poor and gravitate to meals that are easy to come by. I think the anti-corporate 'nerve' comes from the fact that they have the financial power via corporation to spread themselves everywhere, and as with other large corporations, to lobby successfully for laws that favor them. Everybody likes a bargain but it takes real knowledge and self control to avoid eating at places like this for your long term health. Poor people have free will, like everybody else, except that statistically they almost always chose what is cheaper now over what might be healthier long term. At any rate is always nice to see somebody asking questions. There is no doubt in my mind that when it comes to corporations there are folk all over the spectrum with much of both ends of it being quite insane.

There are plenty of threads to discuss the right or wrongness of selling things that ruin people's health - or heck start one. This thread happens to be about a corporation taking a step in the right direction by recycling their used oil which gets processed into biodiesel. As with most any profitable corporation, the things they do may not be altruistic - they should be credited with finding something to do with their waste that is positive.

I was not and was not interested in discussing the right or wrong of selling things that ruin people's health. I was interested in relating that fact to the question you raised as to why corporations are not always credited with achievements in other areas that may be positive. We do not, generally speaking, I am never sure about you, credit a mother who keeps a clean house with being a good homemaker if she has also murdered her kids.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I was not and was not interested in discussing the right or wrong of selling things that ruin people's health. I was interested in relating that fact to the question you raised as to why corporations are not always credited with achievements in other areas that may be positive. We do not, generally speaking, I am never sure about you, credit a mother who keeps a clean house with being a good homemaker if she has also murdered her kids.

I thank my wife all the time for what she does. Does she not deserve credit for the good things she does even though she buys too many shoes or waste money in other ways?

Do you always qualify any praise you may give out with a list of negatives?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
They let you in too? :p

Yes Winston, they let me in too.:) Good to see you're in charge of this place.

Now do you want to talk about the thread topic or are you just here to nef?:evil: J/K :laugh:
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
How many billions of burgers and fries has McD's served and they just started doing this now? The topic title should be "What took that evil corporation so long" or "Now they think they can call themselves Green?"

I'm surprised they did this without someone suing/forcing them to, so kudos are in order for them. Nobody had to sue them to get them to do the right thing for once.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
How many billions of burgers and fries has McD's served and they just started doing this now? The topic title should be "What took that evil corporation so long" or "Now they think they can call themselves Green?"

I'm surprised they did this without someone suing/forcing them to, so kudos are in order for them. Nobody had to sue them to get them to do the right thing for once.

Yeah, I agree to an extent but I'm sure this has been in the planning works for years. This isn't something that can just happen in a month or two. The volume most likely means they will have a pretty decent sized reclaimation refinery. Ever dealt with regulations for those? I've had to deal with them in my line of work. It takes years to jump through the hoops. Plus we now have better technology to refine/produce the biofuels which makes it more cost effective for them to now do something on this large of scale.

BTW, they never said they were green.
It is good to see though that you will atleast credit them with taking a step in the right direction.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
How many billions of burgers and fries has McD's served and they just started doing this now? The topic title should be "What took that evil corporation so long" or "Now they think they can call themselves Green?"

I'm surprised they did this without someone suing/forcing them to, so kudos are in order for them. Nobody had to sue them to get them to do the right thing for once.

Yeah, I agree to an extent but I'm sure this has been in the planning works for years. This isn't something that can just happen in a month or two. The volume most likely means they will have a pretty decent sized reclaimation refinery. Ever dealt with regulations for those? I've had to deal with them in my line of work. It takes years to jump through the hoops. Plus we now have better technology to refine/produce the biofuels which makes it more cost effective for them to now do something on this large of scale.

BTW, they never said they were green.
It is good to see though that you will atleast credit them with taking a step in the right direction.

Biodiesel has always been pretty cheap. The biggest cost is simply getting the oils to convert to the ester form, which is really the better form of biodiesel. The only other parts are storage/converting facilities for large scale production, methanol and sodium hydroxide -- with the latter two being pretty cheap (I want to say that when the cost of oil is zero, the other two don't even break $1 a gallon). However, as already mentioned, the even bigger one is having a government agree to its use, as it would potentially hurt tax revenues. If you're producing your own fuel, there goes your gas tax.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,227
6,634
126
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I was not and was not interested in discussing the right or wrong of selling things that ruin people's health. I was interested in relating that fact to the question you raised as to why corporations are not always credited with achievements in other areas that may be positive. We do not, generally speaking, I am never sure about you, credit a mother who keeps a clean house with being a good homemaker if she has also murdered her kids.

I thank my wife all the time for what she does. Does she not deserve credit for the good things she does even though she buys too many shoes or waste money in other ways?

Do you always qualify any praise you may give out with a list of negatives?

You are simply, in your myopic way, focused on some detail of a situation rather that the larger issues. I am not interested in praising or not praising a corporation for some aspect of its behavior. I am interested in looking at a corporation, what it does, who it impacts positively and negatively, and trying to determine in some objective and unbiased way its overall effect and desirability in a society. The recycling of a waste product they produce would be just one factor among potentially multitudes of other factors I would look at in trying to formulate an opinion.

I am not, as you seem to be, married, either physically or emotionally, to McDonald's and as such see no reason why I should want to cement any relationship to them via the valuable interpersonal trait of rendering praise. What I am interested in, primarily, is society at large and how most to order our lives so as to benefit the most people in the best way we can discover.

It is an unfortunate fact, but one born out by truth in every direction, I believe, that people who incorporate bring together the sum total of their individual moralities and ethical notions, and that, in a competitive society of the kind we have created, the desire for a dollar seems to work its way to the forefront of too many corporations' bottom lines. It will be incumbent, therefore, in any society which desires not to be preyed upon by a more malicious collection of primarily self interested individuals who might be tempted to put their own financial interests above the good of the larger society they in some respects parasitism, that somebody with equal or greater power keep an eye on them and their behavior. Corporations, you may have noted, spend billions and billions blowing their own horn and proclaiming to the world how great they are through the medium of advertisement. I see no reason, myself, to add to that choir in any other respect than what I just explained above.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,815
4,910
136
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
This is by far the most idiotic thread i have ever read on this forum. (but i haven't been here that long so don't feel too bad about it)

They are getting rid of their waste and making money out of it and you are here to tell us that they do it because they're "green"?

Saving money is not the same as making money. As a bonus they are doing a small part in reducing crude oil dependence as well as lowering their enviromental impact through less emissions.

I fail to see how anyone could construe this as "bad" thing. It seems like a win/win deal all around. Hate on the organization all you want, but at least give them credit for small steps in the right direction.

Nope, never ever ever give them credit for anything - it's all just a ploy - they don't really mean it. They are just looking to line their pockets with gold and fill their pools with wads of cash! :roll:

Boy I get sick of people always hating on a company - just because they are a big corporation. Why not try to give credit where credit is due? Without doing that you look like nothing but a bunch of spoiled whiners.

What? What? What? Can you please list the posters who were attacking McDonald's because they are large?

And can you also please demonstrate impartial objectivity of the kind you desire by criticizing McDonald's just a bit. I get sick of people always loving on a company just because they are large. Without doing that you look like a sycophant.

I don't love McDonalds but as I stated - I'll give them credit when credit is due. This is one such case where credit is due. Yet here we have people hating on McDonalds. Because they are large? Maybe - some people are like that. How else do you explain it? Hell, I'm up for ideas but we've seen it before and I'll bet dollars to donuts that it's the anti-corporate nerve being struck.

It's not that they hate McDonalds.

They've just grown a bit weary of your overblown praise for large Corps making small gestures that cost nothing and grow profits.
 

damnwolverine

Junior Member
Oct 27, 2005
21
11
76
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: damnwolverine
Whoa! Wb CAD.

Who you be?

Well I would say WWYBYWB to wolvie, but his join date & post count are pretty amazing!

Yeah, they joined AFTER I was banned. :p

Hehe I rarely post but I've been a lurker since 2002. I mostly disagree with CAD's opinion, but I like to read them anyway :)
 

daveshel

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
5,453
2
81
So, here's this company that has served dangerous quantities of saturated fat to three generations of Americans while hiding behind happy songs and touchy-feely sentimental appeals, and we're expected to believe they give a crap about anything besides their bottom line? Anybody who walks through their doors is either willfully ignorant of basic nutrition or has a death wish.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,224
661
126
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
This is by far the most idiotic thread i have ever read on this forum. (but i haven't been here that long so don't feel too bad about it)

They are getting rid of their waste and making money out of it and you are here to tell us that they do it because they're "green"?

Saving money is not the same as making money. As a bonus they are doing a small part in reducing crude oil dependence as well as lowering their enviromental impact through less emissions.

I fail to see how anyone could construe this as "bad" thing. It seems like a win/win deal all around. Hate on the organization all you want, but at least give them credit for small steps in the right direction.

Nope, never ever ever give them credit for anything - it's all just a ploy - they don't really mean it. They are just looking to line their pockets with gold and fill their pools with wads of cash! :roll:

Boy I get sick of people always hating on a company - just because they are a big corporation. Why not try to give credit where credit is due? Without doing that you look like nothing but a bunch of spoiled whiners.

What? What? What? Can you please list the posters who were attacking McDonald's because they are large?

And can you also please demonstrate impartial objectivity of the kind you desire by criticizing McDonald's just a bit. I get sick of people always loving on a company just because they are large. Without doing that you look like a sycophant.

I don't love McDonalds but as I stated - I'll give them credit when credit is due. This is one such case where credit is due. Yet here we have people hating on McDonalds. Because they are large? Maybe - some people are like that. How else do you explain it? Hell, I'm up for ideas but we've seen it before and I'll bet dollars to donuts that it's the anti-corporate nerve being struck.

It's not that they hate McDonalds.

They've just grown a bit weary of your overblown praise for large Corps making small gestures that cost nothing and grow profits.

Winner.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Wow, they'll let anyone back into this place. :thumbsup: Guess the scales have been tilted a bit too far to the left lately. WB CSG.
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Originally posted by: daveshel
So, here's this company that has served dangerous quantities of saturated fat to three generations of Americans while hiding behind happy songs and touchy-feely sentimental appeals, and we're expected to believe they give a crap about anything besides their bottom line? Anybody who walks through their doors is either willfully ignorant of basic nutrition or has a death wish.

If the demand wasn't there, they wouldn't have thrived.

Like with SUVs and huge friggin' gas-slurpin' pickup trucks. It's supply & demand.

If you want to drive a battery-powered tin can, you have every right to do so (at least in North America, and I imagine most other places too).

"... death wish."
Getting out of bed in the morning, getting into/onto any vehicle, crossing the street, eating fruit & veggies, hiking, swimming, jogging ... anything can kill you these days.

Wouldn't you rather live a shorter, more fun, life (with real food) than a long, dull, bland life where your only purpose is to make every effort to live longer?

OH boy, more oatmeal and veggies .....Yay life!

You might as well be hooked to a respirator.


Live a little!
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,537
1,103
126
Originally posted by: techs
McDonalds is doing this for money and/or publicity.
For years they put their burgers in styrofoam containers. They only changed when enough people said they wouldn't eat at McDonalds unless they got rid of the those non-biodegrable containers.
Corporations are only "green" when it helps their bottom line.

Uh, the phased the styrofom containers out in the mid 1980s, mainly because of CFCs, not because people protested.
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: techs
McDonalds is doing this for money and/or publicity.
For years they put their burgers in styrofoam containers. They only changed when enough people said they wouldn't eat at McDonalds unless they got rid of the those non-biodegrable containers.
Corporations are only "green" when it helps their bottom line.

Uh, the phased the styrofom containers out in the mid 1980s, mainly because of CFCs, not because people protested.

And, the funny/stupid part was that they protested against the containers as CFC-expanded foam (especially evil because it also allegedly punched holes in the ozone layer), when McD's got their foam containers from a company that uses steam-expanded foam (and they had a method of separating the foam out of the trash so it could be recycled).

"It's not easy being Green"