• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Texture Compression in Tribes 2.

Pacinamac23

Senior member
Ok, I am a little confused by texture compression in T2. When I set it to "nicest" it looks really great, but obviously the frame rate suffers. Now, when I set it to "none" it looks likt utter crap. I am just wonder, why should I have to have them compressed to look good? I got a 64mb Vcard, it should be able to handle them, shouldn't it? Could someone please explain exactly how this all works?
 
im not an expert in this yet, but ill give a stab at it.

it isn't about how much memory you have, its about the memory bandwith.

say you have a pipe this big ( memory bus)

------------


------------

and you need to stuff texture this wide through it ( the wider the better looking )

###############
###############
###############
###############
###############
###############

well, you can either lower the quality of the texture ( which would lower the width ) or you can compress it so it fits.

if you choose to compress it, you are taking a more complex picture than normal which requires more processing power and compressing that, which requires even more processor power ( hence slower fps ).


EDIT:
hence the term "bottleneck". each video card has a certain sized pipe, and each cpu has a certain sized pipe. the system can only run at the speed of the smallest pipe, the better the graphics chipset the bigger its pipe, the faster the cpu the bigger its pipe is
 
Back
Top