• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Texas schools to get controversial syllabus

Status
Not open for further replies.

takeru

Golden Member
I can see this is gonna get ugly really fast:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10141121.stm

Education officials in the US state of Texas have adopted new guidelines to the school curriculum which critics say will politicise teaching.

The changes include teaching that the United Nations could be a threat to American freedom, and that the Founding Fathers may not have intended a complete separation of church and state.

Critics say the changes are ideological and distort history, but proponents argue they are redressing a long-standing liberal bias in education.

Analysts say Texas, with five million schoolchildren, wields substantial influence on school curriculums across the US.

The BBC's Rajesh Mirchandani in Los Angeles says publishers of texbooks used nationally often print what Texas wants to teach.

Jefferson out

Students in Texas will now be taught the benefits of US free-market economics and how government taxation can harm economic progress.

They will study how American ideals benefit the world bu organisations like the UN could be a threat to personal freedom.

And Thomas Jefferson has been dropped from the syllabus, despite being one of the Founding Fathers who is credited with developing the idea that church and state should be separate.

The doctrine has become a cornerstone of US government, but some religious groups and some members of the Texas Education Board disagree, our correspondent says.

The board, which is dominated by Christian conservatives, voted nine-to-five in favour of adopting the new curriculum for both primary and secondary schools.

But during the discussions some of the most controversial ideas were dropped - including a proposal to refer to the slave trade as the "Atlantic triangular trade".

Opponents of the changes worry that textbooks sold in other states will be written to comply with the new Texas standards, meaning that the alterations could have an impact on curriculums nationwide.

I'd move this to P&N but it already exists there.
Admin allisolm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
its ridiculous that shit like this can be passed

It's ridiculous that democrats don't want to enforce laws legally passed to protect this country from all threats foreign or domestic, or even to protect and defend the constitution.

This is a drop in the bucket compared to that.
 
It's ridiculous that democrats don't want to enforce laws legally passed to protect this country from all threats foreign or domestic, or even to protect and defend the constitution.

This is a drop in the bucket compared to that.

I've gotta disagree. That has more immediate results, but this impacts the mindset of at least a few years' worth of kids. What we teach our kids is just as important as keeping them from getting suicide bombed.

I mean what's the point of having kids if they're going to be stupid?
 
Last edited:
Seriously, the other states should get together and say they won't purchase textbooks with such a distorted version of history.

Let Texas have to pay extra for schoolbooks that are only used in Texas.
I'm thinking that only New York and California would have to do it. Combined they have far more purchasing power than Texas.
 
Gonna get challenged by ACLU, lose and the board members will get voted out and the state will get stuck with the legal bills. Guess they haven't heard what happened in Kansas.
 
I've gotta disagree. That has more immediate results, but this impacts the mindset of at least a few years' worth of kids. What we teach our kids is just as important as keeping them from getting suicide bombed.

I mean what's the point of having kids if they're going to be stupid?

In case you aren't up on the news, our beloved leaders in Congress have stated they're probably not going to enforce illegal immigration laws, especially helping out Arizona enforce the laws that were legally created specifically for that purpose.

In other words, the current administration nor Congress is interested in what you or I have to say, or think. They hold us in the highest contempt, and their only interests are creating democrat voters out of illegal immigrants (criminals in effect) to further their own petty agendas (namely instituting the glorified slavery that is the welfare state).

Btw, for all the geniuses in this thread that skipped history class in high school, I was in a public school, and the history taught there was so pathetically left leaning, it's no surprise people are all confused about the great deeds of Communism (50 million deaths, anyone?) or that so many people think socialism isn't a bad idea (dealing with the DMV to pay for cold medicine, anyone?)

I don't think this is a good idea, but it's no surprise people pass shit like this, given how the "history" taught is so painfully obviously politicised to cater to all the ignorant self loathing leftists out there.
 
Last edited:
In case you aren't up on the news, our beloved leaders in Congress have stated they're probably not going to enforce illegal immigration laws, especially helping out Arizona enforce the laws that were legally created specifically for that purpose.

In other words, the current administration nor Congress is interested in what you or I have to say, or think. They hold us in the highest contempt, and their only interests are creating democrat voters out of illegal immigrants (criminals in effect) to further their own petty agendas (namely instituting the glorified slavery that is the welfare state).

Ok, but that's not what this thread is about and since this topic isn't in any way asinine, I see no reason to threadjack.
 
Ok, but that's not what this thread is about and since this topic isn't in any way asinine, I see no reason to threadjack.

You talked about rewriting history, that's exactly what the democrats are doing--by ignoring the constitutional principals by which they were sworn into office.

Perfectly valid, but thank you for letting me educate you.
 
As a Texan with 4 kids in the public school system, I have not issue with the first two points, but I don't like that they are removing Jefferson from the textbooks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top