Texas Republicans try to invalidate 127,000 ballots

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dave_5k

Golden Member
May 23, 2017
1,577
3,079
136

Further extreme eww, judge has openly and deliberately left the issue wide open for continued litigation, and has back-door substantially granted what plaintiffs were seeking even while officially ruling they have no standing:

"Re: certain pending 5th Circuit appeal, Hanen says if he did find GOP had standing, he would likely halt drive-thru voting tomorrow. He orders Harris County to keep all drive-thru memory cards separate in case higher court intervenes."
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,016
2,850
136
In the Judge’s defense he also said he would deny the injunction even if upon appeal the 5th circuit found they had standing.

Further extreme eww, judge has openly and deliberately left the issue wide open for continued litigation, and has back-door substantially granted what plaintiffs were seeking even while officially ruling they have no standing:

"Re: certain pending 5th Circuit appeal, Hanen says if he did find GOP had standing, he would likely halt drive-thru voting tomorrow. He orders Harris County to keep all drive-thru memory cards separate in case higher court intervenes."

These seem like opposite conclusions.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Good news, sounds like if this was brought before him in a timely fashion he would find a reason to rule the other way.

The only way it could have been timely would have been before the votes were cast.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,526
9,899
136
Looks like the apparent discrepancy is due to the judge distinguishing between pre-election day drive through voting and election day drive through voting. Presumably with the goal of putting a big asterisk by the votes to give the GOP room to maneuver.

Why does the federal district court have any say in interpreting state law? I thought state law went through state courts, and then from a state supreme court to the US supreme court.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,091
136
Why does the federal district court have any say in interpreting state law? I thought state law went through state courts, and then from a state supreme court to the US supreme court.

There are both federal and state law claims being made by these plaintiffs.

Federal courts can also adjudicate pure state law claims under diversity jurisdiction, though that is not what happened here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zorba

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Looks like the apparent discrepancy is due to the judge distinguishing between pre-election day drive through voting and election day drive through voting. Presumably with the goal of putting a big asterisk by the votes to give the GOP room to maneuver.


This explains it a little better-


It's mostly gibberish. "Plaintiffs are denied standing, but if the 5th circuit rules otherwise, today, then I'll rule against more drive thru voting tomorrow. Oh, and votes already cast count, but keep them separate because reasons."

If he didn't have the balls to throw out votes the Texas SCOTUS ruled to be valid I seriously doubt that the 5th circuit will, either. He keeps some right wing cred with the dance.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
27,226
36,194
136
Well that's a bit of welcome news, sounds like the judge was able to seperate his personal views from carrying out the law. Pity he felt the need to comment, guy wants to cover his ass though.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,591
3,421
136
This country has the most fucked election system on the planet. I thought we'd have learned after the Bush/Gore bullshit. It's glaringly obvious that we need a single federal system, so we can avoid having to deal with this fuckery from red state yokels every single election.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
It was clear the electoral college was a screw up from the beginning, but it's a screw up that benefits a sufficient number of politicians to keep any fix from getting passed.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,358
5,112
136
The purpose of taking away 127000 votes gives power to who?
They don't have to be right to take a shot at it.
Perhaps we should have a system in place to decide if a grievance is valid? We could call it a "Court".
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
They don't have to be right to take a shot at it.
Perhaps we should have a system in place to decide if a grievance is valid? We could call it a "Court".

It's a despicable act to attempt to invalidate the votes of 127,000 honest Americans who availed themselves of drive thru voting. You know that. That's why they held back the suit until after the voting had occurred. It's over 1% of the anticipated vote total & could well swing the election. The GOP will lose their minds if it does.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
83,983
47,906
136
They don't have to be right to take a shot at it.
Perhaps we should have a system in place to decide if a grievance is valid? We could call it a "Court".
I must have missed where anyone said they couldn’t sue. They are just reprehensible human beings for doing it. People shouldn’t forget what sort of people make up the Republican Party.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,218
14,904
136
I must have missed where anyone said they couldn’t sue. They are just reprehensible human beings for doing it. People shouldn’t forget what sort of people make up the Republican Party.

I'm trying to think back to all the other elections I've partaken in and I'm wondering if there was ever a time when people were more nonchalant about voter suppression or the possibility of votes that met all the legal requirements not counting. I seem to recall some talk during the Bush/gore election but it was about counting more votes (military overseas if I remember correctly).

I just don't get how any patriotic American wouldn't get upset and angry if any person, let alone a political party, was actively trying to invalidate peoples vote. Like if you have any concern for democracy how could you support any entity that engages in this behavior? The lack of concern from some people on this forum is baffling to me.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
21,193
19,658
136
The Trumpist party is literal fascist anti Democratic gerrymandering voter suppression minority rule loving trash.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,014
26,891
136
I'm trying to think back to all the other elections I've partaken in and I'm wondering if there was ever a time when people were more nonchalant about voter suppression or the possibility of votes that met all the legal requirements not counting. I seem to recall some talk during the Bush/gore election but it was about counting more votes (military overseas if I remember correctly).

I just don't get how any patriotic American wouldn't get upset and angry if any person, let alone a political party, was actively trying to invalidate peoples vote. Like if you have any concern for democracy how could you support any entity that engages in this behavior? The lack of concern from some people on this forum is baffling to me.
In the 2000 election, they counted military ballots that didn’t meet the requirements for a legal ballot having been post marked after the election date. The two campaigns chose not to contest the unlawful ballots even though they might have turned the election results in Florida. In retrospect one wonders how many military personnel died who might still be alive if the Gore campaign had contested those late ballots.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
31,550
9,907
136
In the 2000 election, they counted military ballots that didn’t meet the requirements for a legal ballot having been post marked after the election date. The two campaigns chose not to contest the unlawful ballots even though they might have turned the election results in Florida. In retrospect one wonders how many military personnel died who might still be alive if the Gore campaign had contested those late ballots.

Man, that's one hell of a rear-looking perspective. Like, mic-drop worthy
 
Last edited:

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,305
136
plaintiff and all-around shitbird "dr" steven hotze has a twitter. and posts completely normal things to it.

FFS, can someone please explain to me how population reduction, which would increase the bargaining power of the lower classes, would benefit the uber-wealthy elite? And oh no, a forced vaccine microchip to track us all! Like that kind of thing is even necessary when we all pay for our smartphones that we carry with us everywhere.
Goddamn these nutters are fucking stupid.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,027
2,595
136
FFS, can someone please explain to me how population reduction, which would increase the bargaining power of the lower classes, would benefit the uber-wealthy elite? And oh no, a forced vaccine microchip to track us all! Like that kind of thing is even necessary when we all pay for our smartphones that we carry with us everywhere.
Goddamn these nutters are fucking stupid.
That is one deranged twitter feed. Holy hell!
 

esquared

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 8, 2000
23,641
4,851
146
plaintiff and all-around shitbird "dr" steven hotze has a twitter. and posts completely normal things to it.

Maybe he and the sex-with-dream/demons doctor can get together and swap stories.
I think she's from Texas too, right?

Yep Houston

Hey, this hotze fool is from Houston too.
Maybe the two of them know each other.