Thump553
Lifer
- Jun 2, 2000
- 12,839
- 2,625
- 136
In the 2000 election, they counted military ballots that didn’t meet the requirements for a legal ballot having been post marked after the election date. The two campaigns chose not to contest the unlawful ballots even though they might have turned the election results in Florida. In retrospect one wonders how many military personnel died who might still be alive if the Gore campaign had contested those late ballots.
Correct me if I'm wrong (but I don't think I am) but I don't think the Democratic Party has in the modern era (post GOP taking over the white South, say 1972) contested any vote on a technical ground. I participated in legal voter protection efforts as a volunteer attorney for the Dems in 2000, 2004 and 2008 and every single time our underlying instructions were clear-assist ANY person attempting to vote that looked their efforts were being frustrated by a technical interpretation of the rules.
Both parties used to act that way as well, until the GOP forfeited their souls as Americans. Increasingly the courts have been going down the same road. Nothing good for America will come of this trend.
