Testicles...

[mobobuff]

I do not want this topic to be offending or disgusting in nature. This is an honestly serious and pondered on question dealing mainly with body design and vulnerability. Please attempt to remove all taboo and vulgar concepts related to this body part and handle it with maturity before voting or posting.

The question...

Would you, if it were painless and scarless, opt off your testicles?

Or, to rephrase, wish to have been born without testicles. Since this is a hypothetical question, we can ignore laws of reality. What if you could just snap your fingers and have no nads?

On the condition that sperm could still functionally exist, and orgasm would feel the same. Also considering, that it WOULD appear odd to yourself (for a while) and to others (unless this became popular).

The theory is, that if you remove the reproductive function from testicles (and place it elsewhere)... do they become a nuisance? Think about all the times you've been hit in the testicles, or have just been grazed, and it has hurt badly. Or think about the times when you actually SIT on them (and it hurts), or landing a particularly high jump in boxers or other loose underwear, or having to constantly reposition them because they do not agree with your current body configuration. Generally, keep in mind the nuisance they can provide. And then answer the question.

Also question if you would feel any less "of a man" if you did not have testicles? Why?

 

[AFB]

Originally posted by: Kalvin00

Testicles....a bottleneck?

I was ready to come in here and say mine were overclocked... but in any case...



WHISKEY

Tango

 

[Kalvin00]

Testicles....a bottleneck?

I was ready to come in here and say mine were overclocked... but in any case...



WHISKEY

 

[TheBDB]

:Q

 

[DannyBoy]

For a minute there I thought you were the guy that started the "Does a guys butt feel the same as a girls butt" thread.

Originally posted by: amdfanboy

Originally posted by: Kalvin00

Testicles....a bottleneck?

I was ready to come in here and say mine were overclocked... but in any case...



WHISKEY

Tango

Foxtrot

 

[Cobalt]

No testicles = no testosterone. I like my testosterone, I will not be handing over my man card yet thank you.

 

[dighn]

they do seem like a vulnerability but i haven't been hurt there enough to consider what you wrote any more than a joke

 

[bdjohnson]

you could say the same about the penis being a nuisance too.

 

[shimsham]

why not just get a sex change?

 

[mobobuff]

Originally posted by: cobalt
No testicles = no testosterone. I like my testosterone, I will not be handing over my man card yet thank you.

Okay. Place hormone production in another organ as well (or just make an organ up).

I mean, we're in the age of streamlining, why not streamline male genitalia?

My life's pretty active physically, and I know testicles haven't given me a very easy time, but I'm not promoting this or anything. I haven't even decided myself. I just wondered what anybody else might think about this.

 

[vshah]

do your balls hang low...do they wobble to and fro...

i'd keep em

 

[mobobuff]

Originally posted by: bdjohnson
you could say the same about the penis being a nuisance too.

No, I wouldn't. The penis provides too many functions.

shimsham
why not just get a sex change?

Because that would also involve the penis.

 

[DannyBoy]

you are one strange little man (or boy?) mobobuff...

 

[DWW]

...having to constantly reposition them because they do not agree with your current body configuration...

haha so true.

 

[DrPizza]

I vote for "KEEP THEM"

Seriously... what else would I scratch when I wake up in the morning??

 

[fredtam]

No I like playing with them. So does the wife.

 

[myusername]

Not to be *too* flippant, but what's she (or he) going to hold onto while performing oral? Would kinda takes some of the fun out of that.

 

[mobobuff]

And no threat of testicular cancer.

We've been self-conditioned our whole lives (well.. since we were 5) to deal with the problems they can cause and to expect and prevent, it's almost an art the skills we've developed. So have these tasks become so routine that it's not so much of a nuisance?

These are the questions that plague my mind 🙂

 

[Schadenfroh]

the reason they are exposed to the outside in the scrotum is that the sperm production needs to be cooler than the rest of the body. that is the reason your nads are not located in the same position as a females overies. So if your sperm producing organs were placed internally away from danger, then your sperm count would diminish and you would not be able to reproduce.

 

[mobobuff]

Originally posted by: fredtam
No I like playing with them. So does the wife.

Originally posted by: myusername
Not to be *too* flippant, but what's she (or he) going to hold onto while performing oral? Would kinda takes some of the fun out of that.

Ah, yes, I knew the topic of erogenoustic value would come up... and it's true. But it's been proven that the area behind and just under the testicles is equally as stimulating. You'd still have that. Are you willing to sacrafice a life of convenience for a few minutes of woman-handling a few times a month?

 

[JoeKing]

You just stay FAR away from my boys!!!

 

[MichaelD]

Originally posted by: mobobuff

Originally posted by: fredtam
No I like playing with them. So does the wife.

Originally posted by: myusername
Not to be *too* flippant, but what's she (or he) going to hold onto while performing oral? Would kinda takes some of the fun out of that.

Ah, yes, I knew the topic of erogenoustic value would come up... and it's true. But it's been proven that the area behind and just under the testicles is equally as stimulating. You'd still have that. Are you willing to sacrafice a life of convenience for a few minutes of woman-handling a few times a month?

Having my family globules lovingly jiggled by a pretty girl is one of the best things in the world, period.

To lose the two nuts that live downstairs would be losing a lot of my manhood and my happiness in life.

 

[KarenMarie]

Originally posted by: JoeKing
You just stay FAR away from my boys!!!

Hahahahaha!!!


:beer:

 

[mobobuff]

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
the reason they are exposed is that the sperm production needs to be cooler than the rest of the body. that is the reason your nads are not located in the same position as a females overies. So if your sperm producing organs were placed internally away from danger, then your sperm count would diminish and you would not be able to reproduce.

Most of us have taken a high school anatomy class, but thank you, that brings up another valuable aspect of the hypothetical question. Imagine that your sperm count is not harmed by the rise of a few degrees. Or imagine that the internal organ taking over the reproductive task has internal AC. Anything.

 

[JeffCos]

Originally posted by: mobobuff

Originally posted by: cobalt
No testicles = no testosterone. I like my testosterone, I will not be handing over my man card yet thank you.

Okay. Place hormone production in another organ as well (or just make an organ up).

I mean, we're in the age of streamlining, why not streamline male genitalia?

My life's pretty active physically, and I know testicles haven't given me a very easy time, but I'm not promoting this or anything. I haven't even decided myself. I just wondered what anybody else might think about this.

They have hormone injections...that way you can control exeactly how much testosterone (or estrogen if you're governor Mcgreevy) Who said that? But anyway, i've heard of pro body builders have a double orchiectomy (operation to remove them) because it does something, i can't remember what...but it happens, i swear.