Test your pc effect on flash player

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
241 Dogs...
C2D E7500 at 3.6 GHz
8GB of RAM
Win7 64 bit
GTX 260

Seems like a low score...
 

Sphexi

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2005
7,280
0
0
165...Intel Q6600 quad core, not oc'd. Same deal as others, only used about 60-70% total CPU. Tried multiple browsers, always around the same.

Also, why do I see Rubycon all over the top list?
 

TridenT

Lifer
Sep 4, 2006
16,800
45
91
226. Strange. I guess Core i7's are really whooping some ass in this. I'm at 3.6Ghz on a Core 2 Duo E7200. Weak-sauce, I know.
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
44
91
Hay thanks for reminding me about this.

My new system scores 261 compared to my older system that got 188. Still got a few torrents going in the background and haven't OCed the system yet. This is a 920 with 12GB of RAM compared to a Q6600 something quad core with 3GB of RAM before. Seems a little on the slow side considering the upgrade. I may be moving to a 970 soonish though.
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,359
9,740
136
280 dogs on mothership rig.

460 didn't seem to load at all, while all cores on my proc were hitting 60-70%.

Wonder if my 460 is accelerating flash...
 

duragezic

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,234
4
81
143 dirty, stankin' dogs

Opteron 165 @ 2.7ghz
Firefox

I knew my CPU was getting old but compared to even the faster C2Ds it's slower, much less the C2Q and now all the i5/i7/whatever.