Test drove the Evo X

JJ650

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,959
0
76
I really liked it. The interior is much nicer than the previous generation and the outward looks are a lot better too.
The performace was really nice as well. The turbo lag is very slight but winds up quickly.
The pull is strong around 3-4k but falls off a bit after 5k rpm. It put a stupid grin on my face though. It's no v8, but they squeeze an awful lot of power of that 2.0 litre.


It corners like it is on rails. I drove as aggressively as I dared. I didn't want to push it since it wasn't my car and I had the salesman sitting there with me. He said he could drive it if I wanted to see how it handled when pushed more. We swapped seats and he took off down a twisty road near the dealership. He was throwing it hard into the turns and it didn't complain once. Barely any tire squall. Had I tried that in the wife's TL type S, it definitely would have been making some noise.
At one intersection (with no one around) he made the turn at about 45 and the car hugged the corner the entire way. No wiggle, no pushing out or sliding the rear. It just hugged the road and made the turn. I was seriously impressed. The active yaw control really does the job well.

There are a couple of things I didn't like though. The seats and the trunk. The seats are almost completely race oriented. It's just missing a 4 point harness. The bolsters are large and keep you planted, but it really lacks comfort. I don't think I would want to take it on a long road trip to the beach or to visit granny. Also, there isn't a power option. I think for a $35k+ car, there should be a power option for the driver. It wouldn't add too much weight.

The trunk is quite small. The battery and the sub take a lot of the room. Sub enclosure is located on the right and the battery it located on the left. On the right had side, there is the window washer resevoir as well. That caught me by surprise. I don't know if the previous iterations had it in the trunk as well. I can understand them putting the battery in the back but I don't see why it couldn't be placed lower in the trunk, like BMW does. It would free up a bit of room.

The 650 watt rockford fosgate stereo can do some serious damage to your ears. It really does kick. The salesman had a cd with various songs and demo'd a few. It was starting to get a little painful.

All in all, I was impressed with the thing.




 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
$35k? Car prices are so cheap in America, it?s insane. :Q

The same car over here will start at around £30k, so that?s $60k.
 

apac

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2003
6,212
0
71
Originally posted by: RichUK
$35k? Car prices are so cheap in America, it?s insane. :Q

The same car over here will start at around £30k, so that?s $60k.

Translation: The USD is so weak compared to the £, it's insane.
 

JJ650

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,959
0
76
Originally posted by: RichUK
$35k? Car prices are so cheap in America, it?s insane. :Q

The same car over here will start at around £30k, so that?s $60k.



weak dollar. even if it were strong, I don't think you would find anyone willing to pay $60k for that car.

 

alimoalem

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2005
4,025
0
0
Originally posted by: apac
Originally posted by: RichUK
$35k? Car prices are so cheap in America, it?s insane. :Q

The same car over here will start at around £30k, so that?s $60k.

Translation: The USD is so weak compared to the £, it's insane.

I could be wrong but wouldn't it mean the USD is strong compared to the £?

Anyway, I was the passenger when my friend test drove an Evo VIII. The car definitely put a stupid grin on his face. When we were behind a stop light, the salesman commented on how his smile went from "cheek to cheek."

I think he'd have a heart attack if he drives the Evo X.
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
i think the G8 GT would be a better bargain than the evo, with better gas mileage and i bet it sounds better.
 

JJ650

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,959
0
76
Originally posted by: sniperruff
i think the G8 GT would be a better bargain than the evo, with better gas mileage and i bet it sounds better.

Well when I get the chance to get in a G8 I will let you know.

That Evo X is hella quick and sounds good too. It's not loud in the cabin like the older versions were.
Not one time did I hear the turbo. The engine has a nice throaty sound, but no rumble like a v8.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Ehh I'm sorry, the Evo X is a watered down version of what an Evo is suposed to be. It's tamed down to be more appealing to the masses.
 

Jumpem

Lifer
Sep 21, 2000
10,757
3
81
Originally posted by: JJ650
Well when I get the chance to get in a G8 I will let you know.

That Evo X is hella quick and sounds good too. It's not loud in the cabin like the older versions were.
Not one time did I hear the turbo. The engine has a nice throaty sound, but no rumble like a v8.

That's a big con.
 

JJ650

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,959
0
76
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Ehh I'm sorry, the Evo X is a watered down version of what an Evo is suposed to be. It's tamed down to be more appealing to the masses.

Well, I guess what you have in mind and what Mitsubishi decided were 2 different things.

Just how watered down do you think it is?

Are you displeased with the looks? Frankly I think the Evo needed a new suit and I think this one does very well for it. Getting away from the complete boy-racer look will do them some good. It still is an aggressive look the performance is still there and tweaked (read : transmission).
It needed a make over to keep competitive. The WRX got worked over as well to appeal to an older crowd, who have the purchasing power. If mitsu didn't, they would have been left behind and it could have been the demise of the EVO stateside.
I think what the Evo went thru is exactly what needed to happen.
 

JJ650

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,959
0
76
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: JJ650
Well when I get the chance to get in a G8 I will let you know.

That Evo X is hella quick and sounds good too. It's not loud in the cabin like the older versions were.
Not one time did I hear the turbo. The engine has a nice throaty sound, but no rumble like a v8.

That's a big con.

Well if you're into hearing the wastegate dump all of the time, then yes it's a con. Otherwise it's not so bad.
I think a large reason why is the stereo that he was messing with nearly the entire time.
 

Jumpem

Lifer
Sep 21, 2000
10,757
3
81
Originally posted by: JJ650
Well if you're into hearing the wastegate dump all of the time, then yes it's a con. Otherwise it's not so bad.

I liked the turbo whine from my Forester and STi.
 

JJ650

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,959
0
76
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: JJ650
Well if you're into hearing the wastegate dump all of the time, then yes it's a con. Otherwise it's not so bad.

I liked the turbo whine from my Forester and STi.

Ya, it is nice to hear it sometimes.
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Ehh I'm sorry, the Evo X is a watered down version of what an Evo is suposed to be. It's tamed down to be more appealing to the masses.

you can also say that the Evo has been watered down since Evo V. every version has been softer and a little slower since then.
 

Imported

Lifer
Sep 2, 2000
14,679
23
81
The dealership wouldn't even let me test drive one unless I put a deposit down.. So ridiculous. Just from observations though, I actually like the seats sitting in them. I agree with the trunk.. way too small, and I'd probably strip out the sub. I didn't like that the rear seats down fold down. I'd like a little bit of practicality..
 

overst33r

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
5,761
12
81
Originally posted by: RichUK
$35k? Car prices are so cheap in America, it?s insane. :Q

The same car over here will start at around £30k, so that?s $60k.

That's not quite how automotive currency works. The rule of thumb I've always found accurate was to take the british price and multiply it by 1.3 or so...
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
The prices they are asking are a complete joke.

I was doing some probing about 3 weeks ago and all of my area dealerships are quoting ~2K over MSRP and won't budge an inch.

So an MR with no navi they want 42K and a GSR with no navi and no HID they want 39.

Funny thing is, I haven't seen a single one on the road, so I doubt they are selling very well.
 

KentState

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2001
8,397
393
126
Originally posted by: ayabe
The prices they are asking are a complete joke.

I was doing some probing about 3 weeks ago and all of my area dealerships are quoting ~2K over MSRP and won't budge an inch.

So an MR with no navi they want 42K and a GSR with no navi and no HID they want 39.

Funny thing is, I haven't seen a single one on the road, so I doubt they are selling very well.

Wow, that's a lot of money for one. I would have a hard time paying that much for a car that lacks refinement. A base 335xi sedan starts around 41k and a nicely loaded 135i could be had for that price. I know they don't directly compare but for the money, I'd have a much easier time buying the BMW.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
As much as I love the 335i/135i, the Evo is more of a track rat monster, and easier to mod to truly insane performance levels, so for the performance purist, it makes a certain amount of sense. I'd fully expect the Evo to put similar track times to the M3.

Now daily livability, class, comfort, BMW all the way, every day.

Given the choice, BMW for me .. but I'm just playing devil's advocate here.
 

KentState

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2001
8,397
393
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign
As much as I love the 335i/135i, the Evo is more of a track rat monster, and easier to mod to truly insane performance levels, so for the performance purist, it makes a certain amount of sense. I'd fully expect the Evo to put similar track times to the M3.

Now daily livability, class, comfort, BMW all the way, every day.

Given the choice, BMW for me .. but I'm just playing devil's advocate here.

I think the turbo 6 on the BMW can easily be modded also. I was just thinking how appealing the Evo X would be when trying to take a date out or co-workers and trying to jam them into the racing seats.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: KentState
Originally posted by: Arkaign
As much as I love the 335i/135i, the Evo is more of a track rat monster, and easier to mod to truly insane performance levels, so for the performance purist, it makes a certain amount of sense. I'd fully expect the Evo to put similar track times to the M3.

Now daily livability, class, comfort, BMW all the way, every day.

Given the choice, BMW for me .. but I'm just playing devil's advocate here.

I think the turbo 6 on the BMW can easily be modded also. I was just thinking how appealing the Evo X would be when trying to take a date out or co-workers and trying to jam them into the racing seats.

The Turbo BMW can be modded as well pretty decently. ~400hp seems to be easy with no major component changes, just changing boost level and ECU stuff. ~500hp is possible with some major exhaust/intake/intercooler work.

The thing is though, I saw a Dinan 335i vs. M3 shootout, and while power is easily tappable in the x35i cars, the handling/suspension/braking are pretty far off, making them not nearly the track beasts that the //M or Evo are.
 

Imported

Lifer
Sep 2, 2000
14,679
23
81
Originally posted by: ayabe
The prices they are asking are a complete joke.

I was doing some probing about 3 weeks ago and all of my area dealerships are quoting ~2K over MSRP and won't budge an inch.

So an MR with no navi they want 42K and a GSR with no navi and no HID they want 39.

Funny thing is, I haven't seen a single one on the road, so I doubt they are selling very well.

Odd. I checked a few weeks ago and GSRs had a 5k discount.. could have got one with the aero kit (was on each and every one), but no HID for like 32k. HID was another 2k or so? They wouldn't budge on MRs though.