GTaudiophile
Lifer
- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 33
- 81
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
An AWD and/or MazdaSpeed "3" might be nice...
Originally posted by: OS
Different classes of cars tend to have higher quality standards and build materials. Things like, the accord uses thicker sheetmetal than the civic. I've also torn apart the interior on my 2003 accord and my 2000 corolla and the difference in materials and attention to detail is very large. For example, the corolla used alot of electrical tape in the hiring harnesses, and it was already coming apart after 3 years or so where as the accord used some kind of bonded wrap which was much higher quality.
I don't know if that is the case for the mazdas, but all else equal, I would rather have the larger car than the smaller one. Even if the cost was a little higher, I would rather have a basic larger car than a loaded small one. The cost cutting is quite evident in smaller car because of the econobox and cost cutting orientations.
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: OS
Different classes of cars tend to have higher quality standards and build materials. Things like, the accord uses thicker sheetmetal than the civic. I've also torn apart the interior on my 2003 accord and my 2000 corolla and the difference in materials and attention to detail is very large. For example, the corolla used alot of electrical tape in the hiring harnesses, and it was already coming apart after 3 years or so where as the accord used some kind of bonded wrap which was much higher quality.
I don't know if that is the case for the mazdas, but all else equal, I would rather have the larger car than the smaller one. Even if the cost was a little higher, I would rather have a basic larger car than a loaded small one. The cost cutting is quite evident in smaller car because of the econobox and cost cutting orientations.
Drive a Mazda 3 and then a mazda 6, see if you still feel the same way![]()
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: OS
Different classes of cars tend to have higher quality standards and build materials. Things like, the accord uses thicker sheetmetal than the civic. I've also torn apart the interior on my 2003 accord and my 2000 corolla and the difference in materials and attention to detail is very large. For example, the corolla used alot of electrical tape in the hiring harnesses, and it was already coming apart after 3 years or so where as the accord used some kind of bonded wrap which was much higher quality.
I don't know if that is the case for the mazdas, but all else equal, I would rather have the larger car than the smaller one. Even if the cost was a little higher, I would rather have a basic larger car than a loaded small one. The cost cutting is quite evident in smaller car because of the econobox and cost cutting orientations.
Drive a Mazda 3 and then a mazda 6, see if you still feel the same way![]()
Yeah, I don't know about you, but I thought that the interior of the 3 was of better quality than that of the 6. And the Mazda3 definitely rides and tracks excellently as well. The 3s I drove was just superb.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: NFS4
I just priced a Mazda 3s sedan:
4-speed auto
ABS package
Sport package
$18,665 including destination fee. I'll most likely be getting on in the fall after the rebates and incentives come out. Mazda already has a $2,500 cash rebate on their other models.
Heh, wish I could wait for that but having no car right now has its disadvantages.
Yeah that's true. I have a '95 Camry LE that has 140,000 miles on it and has been practically trouble free. It pains me to have to pick up car payments again by going to a new car, but I don't want to keep this car forever.