Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Mike
Originally posted by: sdifox
Wish I can afford the 06 S65 AMG... V12 is not enough, it has to have twin turbo too :laugh:
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/...ist=748&standard=false
Id prefer the SL65....but at over $300k there are so many other options.
never buy new when it comes to this kind of cars... the S65 started as a 150k car brand new and it's down to 1/3 after 3 years. I can drive 3 year old car no problem.
A big issue is the 4 year warranty. Can you really want a fully loaded V12 Twin Turbo low volume German car after the warranty expires? Are you willing to shell out 3-4k per year on an extended warranty or will you gamble with repair costs?
Also all S600 have the twin turbos after 2002. The AMGs just have a modified engine, 6.0L v.s. 5.5L and 612hp v.s. 500 (510 from 2006-present)
F
U
D
Thanks for trolling.
Have you priced insurance for a S65, have you priced repairs? Matainance and repair costs will run you 3-4k per year, insurance,
halfway decent coverage will run 6k a year, and this is only for the S600, not even S65AMG. Just because the entry price is low does not mean you can afford it, it's a common misconception of many luxury cars.
Here go buy yourself a formerly $170k, 3 year old 600+hp car and don't pay attention to the actual costs of keeping something like that on the road, legally.
Mercedes are not dead reliable. I have a 2006 E500 4Matic, it's been in the shop 3 times in the 1 year I've had it. Scheduled maintenance is not cheap. Insurance is not cheap, and it is nothing even close to the S65.
as for the other poster, of course, the S65 AMG depreciates 80K in the first year, it won't cost as much, but it still takes S class money to pump into a car like that. You cannot cross-shop based on price. A $40k S65 is not comparable to a $40k 335i or a $40K C55 even.
FUD? I's called not being stupid.