'Test Drive Unlimited' XBox 360 screens!

[0roo0roo]

its no misquote, its all you.

but its in your character to flip flop.

 

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
its no misquote, its all you.

but its in your character to flip flop.

You've put me down for being a self-proclaimed gamer when I've never referred to myself as such.
You've put me down for being a self-proclaimed audiophile when not only have I never referred to myself as such, but actually stated outright on various occasions that I'm most certainly not.
You're claiming I said doom3 will run on a gf2 when I said nothing of the sort.

Let's see, you:
- type like an AOLer. Punctuation & capitalization are apparently "2 unk3wl 4 j00", as are sentences and a general state of coherency
- lie about what people say
- flame anyone who disagrees with you, often posting to do nothing but insult, and doing so when a thread is threatening to drop off page 1, thus rekindling the flame - this last is also known as trolling
- have pics of random attractive celebrities in your sig

I'm guessing 14? maybe 15. <120 or >275. You've got a tough life ahead of you, I wish you the best.

 

[daniel1113]

Sigh.

 

[79Blazer]

Here....

 

[0roo0roo]

You've put me down for being a self-proclaimed gamer when I've never referred to myself as such.

one can infer that you are a gamer by what you have already said. if you were not a gamer you wouldn't be buying and installing video cards to play doom 3 or half life or wow, let alone be comparing pc's to consoles. with your fervent defence of pcs and demonization of consoles, its a logical to call you a gamer. and since you've declared yourself defender of pc, you are self declared.

You've put me down for being a self-proclaimed audiophile when not only have I never referred to myself as such, but actually stated outright on various occasions that I'm most certainly not.

you stare down your nose at the ipod for its supposed "horrible sound quality". you pretend to know a lot about sound quality and show up in every ipod thread ever made ranting about such things. but as with pc gaming, you talk big..but you don't hold yourself up to the same standards. so i'll give you that. you aren't an audiophile, just a pseudo audiophile with your treasured hd280 headphones. and really, in ipod threads its just more of the same. you with your smug self righteous sense of superiority telling everyone that the average folk are retards and that there is no reason for the xbox or ipod for existing.

You're claiming I said doom3 will run on a gf2 when I said nothing of the sort.

stop lying, its becoming sad. you claimed that your friend runs doom 3 on a geforce 2 gts just fine. it was fundamental to your arguement that one can save money over an xbox as 5 year old pc hardware would be still undeniably superior and would play todays games.

 

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
one can infer that you are a gamer by what you have already said

Going by that logic I can infer from your typing that were your IQ a farenheit room temperature I'd be freezing my nuts off. You're trying to rationalize lying, give me a break...

stop lying, its becoming sad

Lol, if this isn't a case of projection, I don't know what is :laugh:

 

[RichUK]

Originally posted by: UNCjigga
Dass what I'm talkin about!

edit: Links removed because TeamXbox didn't like my direct linking!

Here's the gallery

edit: I think the car models are a bit too 'shiny' and because of that they don't blend in with the environments as well as they should, but other than that this game is just gorgeous!

EDIT 2: VIDEO!!!!

i think that the video was quite good, but i expect alot more GFX wise in the later days from xbox 360 .. and anyways i will be getting the PS3 instead of the 360 i reckons .. looks better .. no really i think it will be a better cnsole

 

[TuffGuy]

Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Why the heck do they always cut out when the car's about to hit something (is there something wrong with the collision engine?), and what's the point of showing those cars doing endless burnouts?

 

[Wingznut]

Originally posted by: TuffGuy

Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Why the heck do they always cut out when the car's about to hit something (is there something wrong with the collision engine?), and what's the point of showing those cars doing endless burnouts?

The game isn't complete. My guess is that (most likely) they don't have the physics dialed in just right, and don't want everyone on the 'net crying how horrible the crash physics are.

 

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: Wingznut

Originally posted by: TuffGuy

Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Why the heck do they always cut out when the car's about to hit something (is there something wrong with the collision engine?), and what's the point of showing those cars doing endless burnouts?

The game isn't complete. My guess is that (most likely) they don't have the physics dialed in just right, and don't want everyone on the 'net crying how horrible the crash physics are.

They lead up to crashes so blatantly though... you'd think they would only show clips that didn't end in crashes if that were the case, rather than putting in so many cliffhangers. It's definitely odd.

 

[Wingznut]

Originally posted by: Gurck

Originally posted by: Wingznut

Originally posted by: TuffGuy

Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Why the heck do they always cut out when the car's about to hit something (is there something wrong with the collision engine?), and what's the point of showing those cars doing endless burnouts?

The game isn't complete. My guess is that (most likely) they don't have the physics dialed in just right, and don't want everyone on the 'net crying how horrible the crash physics are.

They lead up to crashes so blatantly though... you'd think they would only show clips that didn't end in crashes if that were the case, rather than putting in so many cliffhangers. It's definitely odd.

Yeah, I'm sure it's some big evil corporation conspiracy.

 

[overst33r]

just cuz it looks "good" don't mean it's "good"...

Im really not impressed, pshh! it reminds me of nfs hot pursuit 2. GT4 has better detailed environments than this game and that is on a 300Mhz machine. Dont even get me started on the driving physics...I realize its an arcade game but Come ON!!!

 

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: Wingznut

Originally posted by: Gurck

Originally posted by: Wingznut

Originally posted by: TuffGuy

Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Why the heck do they always cut out when the car's about to hit something (is there something wrong with the collision engine?), and what's the point of showing those cars doing endless burnouts?

The game isn't complete. My guess is that (most likely) they don't have the physics dialed in just right, and don't want everyone on the 'net crying how horrible the crash physics are.

They lead up to crashes so blatantly though... you'd think they would only show clips that didn't end in crashes if that were the case, rather than putting in so many cliffhangers. It's definitely odd.

Yeah, I'm sure it's some big evil corporation conspiracy.

You said it, not me.

 

[dcdude]

im not impressed by graphics in general for any game

and also test drive for ps1 and ps2 was one of the worst racing games ive ever played in my life - pretty graphics arent changing that