Test a benchmark for me...

[Kilrsat]

Originally posted by: dighn

Originally posted by: Kilrsat
Athlon XP (Barton) 2500+ (currently running stock).
1024mb of pc3200
Abit NF7-S
Seagate 200GB SATA drive

Average of two runs of your original benchmark: 2230

Average of two runs of a tweaked version of your benchmark: 4832.5

A few simple changes really make your code much better 🙂

where's the tweaked version??? or did you tweak the decompiled src yourself?

Tweaked it myself. I'll put it up somewhere in a minute. Basically it cuts down on the number of objects created. Instead of creating a StringBuilder, appending two strings to it, then sending it back to a string (only to create another one and repeat the process the next time through), it just creates one StringBuilder and keeps working off that single object.

 

[dighn]

Originally posted by: Kilrsat

Tweaked it myself. I'll put it up somewhere in a minute. Basically it cuts down on the number of objects created.

you must be REALLY bored 😛

 

[Kilrsat]

Originally posted by: dighn

Originally posted by: Kilrsat

Tweaked it myself. I'll put it up somewhere in a minute. Basically it cuts down on the number of objects created.

you must be REALLY bored 😛

Basically.

 

[SportSC4]

AMD non-barton 2600+ (undervolted to 42.5)
512mb of Kingston HyperX
Epox EP-8RDA3I
Titan Geforce3
Atlas 10K II 36.7 SCSI drive w/ Adaptec 29160
2645

BTW, when running this program, it's case sensitive. java benchmark != java Benchmark

 

[Kilrsat]

Just hit 4900 with this one 🙂

Class File

Could most likely squeeze even more out of it, but well, isn't worth it since I already doubled my system score from the 5 minutes I put into it.

Basically, never create objects inside of loops if you can get away with doing it elsewhere.

 

[JustAnAverageGuy]

Originally posted by: Kilrsat

A few simple changes really make your code much better 🙂

If you're THAT bored, heres a command line scientific calculator that I've been working on 😛

Linky

I unfortunately don't have an extra copy of the string.h or bool.h files laying around. 🙁

Everything there works fine so far though. 😛

 

[DAGTA]

Originally posted by: Kilrsat
Just hit 4900 with this one 🙂

Class File

Could most likely squeeze even more out of it, but well, isn't worth it since I already doubled my system score from the 5 minutes I put into it.

Basically, never create objects inside of loops if you can get away with doing it elsewhere.

It's the 'Type-R' sticker that makes it so fast!

5080 on the optimized version.

 

[Kilrsat]

Originally posted by: DAGTA

Originally posted by: Kilrsat
Just hit 4900 with this one 🙂

Class File

Could most likely squeeze even more out of it, but well, isn't worth it since I already doubled my system score from the 5 minutes I put into it.

Basically, never create objects inside of loops if you can get away with doing it elsewhere.

It's the 'Type-R' sticker that makes it so fast!

5080 on the optimized version.

That sticker is 5 extra mhz... or something like that.... 😛

 

[Nohr]

Originally posted by: Nohr
AMD Barton 2500+ @ 2.21GHz (210FSB)
Asus A7N8X Deluxe (NF2) mobo
2x512MB PC3500 @ 210

System score: 2790

6225 with Kilrsat's optimized version.

 

[tfinch2]

Updated OP.

 

[MrCodeDude]

I can't get it to run. I am stupid 🙂

 

[Kilrsat]

Originally posted by: Kilrsat
Just hit 4900 with this one 🙂

Class File

Could most likely squeeze even more out of it, but well, isn't worth it since I already doubled my system score from the 5 minutes I put into it.

Basically, never create objects inside of loops if you can get away with doing it elsewhere.

A few more changes, and 8115... ok, I think that's as much as I can squeeze out of it. Updated the class file on my server if anyone else really wants to try. This was more an exercise for me just to see if I could remember how to optimize java code.

 

[Dead3ye]

AMD Tbred 2100 @ 2.4
Abit NF7-S
1 GB Geil @ 420
ATI 9700 pro
Need more system specs, check my sig

3055 with the original

 

[SuperSix]

I had to upgrade my Java install to 1.5

And the command line is case sensitive.

Anyhoo

1365 on a P4 2.2, 512MB

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: SuperSix
I had to upgrade my Java install to 1.5

And the command line is case sensitive.

Anyhoo

1365 on a P4 2.2, 512MB

wow...only 1365 on a p4? anyways...bump need a few more results

 

[myusername]

Athlon Mobile 2400+ @ 2075 MHz 11.5x180
2x512 PC3200 DDR @100% (180Mhz)

score: 2660

 

[SuperSix]

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: SuperSix
I had to upgrade my Java install to 1.5

And the command line is case sensitive.

Anyhoo

1365 on a P4 2.2, 512MB

wow...only 1365 on a p4? anyways...bump need a few more results

Yes.. really sucks eh? I wonder why?