Terrorists bomb India

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Apr 17, 2005
13,465
3
81
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.



true...i was at a christian rally where i was told to "accept jesus or die"

i told them that certain hindus belive that jesus was just an avatar or vishnu and that we do believe him to be a divine figure. that kind of stumped them and they didnt knwo waht to say to me.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.

You can continue your hate speech against Islamic form of governments. Fundamentalism with its negative connotation is an invention of people like you. Fundamentalism just means belief in the fundamentals of the religion. I dont see how that can be anything other than positive.

well for a start its a negative when the majority of the religion doesnt beleive in womens rights...


no religious fundamentalist govt can lead to a good govt because then religious prejeducieses and ideas would be infilitrated in every desicion...for example george bush and the stem cell research ban or the nonsensical ban against gay marriage. If you believe that there shouldnt be a seperation between church and state, then my friend, you are beyond help...may allah accept you cause he sure as hell doesnt accept a religious govt thats for sure.

*yawn* the first part is a baseless accusation repeated ad nauseum despite countless contradictory evidence given for it.

Religious governments HAVE and CAN lead to good governments. Reference large periods of the Caliphate. While I am no supporter of Bush, those two decisions are two thumbs up in my book. Moreoever, your own point about Bush invalidates your concept of DEMOCRACY being better than a religious government. Ha!
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.



true...i was at a christian rally where i was told to "accept jesus or die"

i told them that certain hindus belive that jesus was just an avatar or vishnu and that we do believe him to be a divine figure. that kind of stumped them and they didnt knwo waht to say to me.

thats the most far-fetched story I have ever heard about Hindu beliefs, but whatever rocks your boat. I respect the belief of certain Hindus. By the way, do you know that certain Muslims believe Vishnu and Shiva were Prophets of Islam ;)
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.

Which was what I said in my earlier post. Thank you for repeating my words.

Religion is NOT dangerous, people are. A misguided but nonetheless useful analogy would be guns dont kill people, people kill people. Misguided or people wanting political gain misue religion for their selfish purposes.

I concur with most of your post. Especially the bolded part.
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Inspector Jihad: That's pretty funny. My mom also told me that Hindus take Jesus as a Holy Figure. They say that one day even Gandhi will be considered "a God." What many people, even Hindus don't realize is that Hinduism is actually a monotheistic religion like Judaism, Islam and Christianity but the multiple "Gods" are just abstract concepts and the embodiment of qualities that are positive. Hinduism is a very complex religion and almost impossible to understand. Ironically I know far more about Catholicism than Hinduism as I went to Catholic school all my life. But I picked up a copy of the Bhagvad Gita a while back and found myself impressed. The message is pretty much the same. I found the same during my very brief readings in the Quran.

By the way I heard the Muslims accept Jesus as a positive figure as do Jews. The funny thing is that probably Islam, Christianity and Judaism are the same religion but they just chose different prophets.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
^^^ That's pretty funny. My mom also told me that Hindus take Jesus as a Holy Figure. They say that one day even Gandhi will be considered "a God." What many people, even Hindus don't realize is that Hinduism is actually a monotheistic religion like Judaism, Islam and Christianity but the multiple "Gods" are just abstract concepts and the embodiment of qualities that are positive. Hinduism is a very complex religion and almost impossible to understand. Ironically I know far more about Catholicism than Hinduism as I went to Catholic school all my life. But I picked up a copy of the Bhagvad Gita a while back and found myself impressed. The message is pretty much the same. I found the same during my very brief readings in the Quran.

You are mistaken. Hinduism as such is not a unified religion. The word Hindu is derived from the Arabic word - Hind, which means beautiful. The Arabs called River Indus as Darya-Hind. The people across the river were collectively termed as Hindus. The beliefs were varied from tribe to tribe.

The religion can be viewed as monotheistic, trinitarion or polytheistic depending upon the Hindu you asked. The Bhagvad Gita itself speaks of multiple Gods and Rakshas/Asurs, etc.

Btw, I do not agree that Hindusim is impossible to understand. That would negate the entire concept of Hinduism being a religion.

Please dont tell me Hindus also believe Mohammad (SA) was an avatar of some God :D

What you heard was incorrect. Muslims believe Jesus/Isa (AS) is the second most important Prophet after Mohammad (SA). Jews on the other hand, as far as I have learned believe Jesus was the son of Satan. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all Abrahamic faiths. Jesus was sent to "correct" the Jews, while Mohammad (SA) brought the final message for all.
 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.

What does that have to do with anything? Stop preaching to me and trying to appease people.

Read the statement I bolded above. He thinks that Islamic fundamentalism is a good form of governance.

Tx for the preaching tho.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.

What does that have to do with anything? Stop preaching to me and trying to appease people.

Read the statement I bolded above. He thinks that Islamic fundamentalism is a good form of governance.

Tx for the preaching tho.

The point was he is concurring with my views to a certain degree. Reread the bolded comment.
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
^^^ That's pretty funny. My mom also told me that Hindus take Jesus as a Holy Figure. They say that one day even Gandhi will be considered "a God." What many people, even Hindus don't realize is that Hinduism is actually a monotheistic religion like Judaism, Islam and Christianity but the multiple "Gods" are just abstract concepts and the embodiment of qualities that are positive. Hinduism is a very complex religion and almost impossible to understand. Ironically I know far more about Catholicism than Hinduism as I went to Catholic school all my life. But I picked up a copy of the Bhagvad Gita a while back and found myself impressed. The message is pretty much the same. I found the same during my very brief readings in the Quran.

You are mistaken. Hinduism as such is not a unified religion. The word Hindu is derived from the Arabic word - Hind, which means beautiful. The Arabs called River Indus as Darya-Hind. The people across the river were collectively termed as Hindus. The beliefs were varied from tribe to tribe.

The religion can be viewed as monotheistic, trinitarion or polytheistic depending upon the Hindu you asked. The Bhagvad Gita itself speaks of multiple Gods and Rakshas/Asurs, etc.

Btw, I do not agree that Hindusim is impossible to understand. That would negate the entire concept of Hinduism being a religion.

Please dont tell me Hindus also believe Mohammad (SA) was an avatar of some God :D

What you heard was incorrect. Muslims believe Jesus/Isa (AS) is the second most important Prophet after Mohammad (SA). Jews on the other hand, as far as I have learned believe Jesus was the son of Satan. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all Abrahamic faiths. Jesus was sent to "correct" the Jews, while Mohammad (SA) brought the final message for all.

I believe you have a few misconceptions. Ultimately Hindusim is a monothestic religion and those Hindus who tell you otherwise have not properly understood it. The three main "Gods" are really just three basic aspects of the same unified God. The problem is that Hinduism does not have a single Holy Book that the supercedes any other. The Bhagvad Gita is the definitive Hindu Holy Book but one of many, it is just the most well known. There are Vedas in four groups that came before. This is what make Hinduism difficult to understand coupled with the fact that greedy Hindus changed the language of Hinduism so that the common man would not understand it properly and always rely on a priest (involving $$$) to perform whatever rites they need to. Remember in Hinduism the main goal is to reach Moksha which is the join the universal God or Universal spirit. There is only one God in Hinduism. Much of the mytholgy in Hinduism is actually just plain fiction designed to relate concepts in an easy to understand way, but unfortunately many people do not see that and find the religion very confusing.

Jews on the other hand do not despise Jesus, they just do not believe that Jesus was not the one the Moses spoke of as the coming of God to earth so they are still waiting for their prophet. They consider Jesus a good person, regardless of what happened around AD31. Some of them, again greedy, to keep power over their people were unhappy that they were losing their ranks to followers of Jesus and they decided to take action, hence the crucifixion. The enlightened Jew would not begrudge Jesus as Jesus was at the least a very good man, just not what they were looking for. Though there is always a little bit of that friction as they think that Christians are stupid and that they ended up following the wrong prophet. However they don't think Jesus was evil or that his followers were. If anything they hope that Christians one day see the error of their choice and pick the "real" prophet when the time comes. Until then they are supposed to peacefully co-exist.


A common theory exists that Islam, Christianty and Judaism the Abrahamic faiths share much with a faith called Zoroastrianism which is said to be the progenitor of Hinduism. Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrian

Also read this on Hinduism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

There are many parallels between the Abrahamic religions and Hinduism.

Also here it says that Jews just view Jesus as an insignificant figure at worst: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_view_of_Jesus
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
^^^ That's pretty funny. My mom also told me that Hindus take Jesus as a Holy Figure. They say that one day even Gandhi will be considered "a God." What many people, even Hindus don't realize is that Hinduism is actually a monotheistic religion like Judaism, Islam and Christianity but the multiple "Gods" are just abstract concepts and the embodiment of qualities that are positive. Hinduism is a very complex religion and almost impossible to understand. Ironically I know far more about Catholicism than Hinduism as I went to Catholic school all my life. But I picked up a copy of the Bhagvad Gita a while back and found myself impressed. The message is pretty much the same. I found the same during my very brief readings in the Quran.

You are mistaken. Hinduism as such is not a unified religion. The word Hindu is derived from the Arabic word - Hind, which means beautiful. The Arabs called River Indus as Darya-Hind. The people across the river were collectively termed as Hindus. The beliefs were varied from tribe to tribe.

The religion can be viewed as monotheistic, trinitarion or polytheistic depending upon the Hindu you asked. The Bhagvad Gita itself speaks of multiple Gods and Rakshas/Asurs, etc.

Btw, I do not agree that Hindusim is impossible to understand. That would negate the entire concept of Hinduism being a religion.

Please dont tell me Hindus also believe Mohammad (SA) was an avatar of some God :D

What you heard was incorrect. Muslims believe Jesus/Isa (AS) is the second most important Prophet after Mohammad (SA). Jews on the other hand, as far as I have learned believe Jesus was the son of Satan. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all Abrahamic faiths. Jesus was sent to "correct" the Jews, while Mohammad (SA) brought the final message for all.

I believe you have a few misconceptions. Ultimately Hindusim is a monothestic religion and those Hindus who tell you otherwise have not properly understood it. The three main "Gods" are really just three basic aspects of the same unified God. The problem is that Hinduism does not have a single Holy Book that the supercedes any other. The Bhagvad Gita is the definitive Hindu Holy Book but one of many, it is just the most well known. There are Vedas in four groups that came before. This is what make Hinduism difficult to understand coupled with the fact that greedy Hindus changed the language of Hinduism so that the common man would not understand it properly and always rely on a priest (involving $$$) to perform whatever rites they need to. Remember in Hinduism the main goal is to reach Moksha which is the join the universal God or Universal spirit. There is only one God in Hinduism. Much of the mytholgy in Hinduism is actually just plain fiction designed to relate concepts in an easy to understand way, but unfortunately many people do not see that and find the religion very confusing.

Jews on the other hand do not despise Jesus, they just do not believe that Jesus was not the one the Moses spoke of as the coming of God to earth so they are still waiting for their prophet. They consider Jesus a good person, regardless of what happened around AD31. Some of them, again greedy, to keep power over their people were unhappy that they were losing their ranks to followers of Jesus and they decided to take action, hence the crucifixion. The enlightened Jew would not begrudge Jesus as Jesus was at the least a very good man, just not what they were looking for. Though there is always a little bit of that friction as they think that Christians are stupid and that they ended up following the wrong prophet. However they don't think Jesus was evil or that his followers were. If anything they hope that Christians one day see the error of their choice and pick the "real" prophet when the time comes. Until then they are supposed to peacefully co-exist.


A common theory exists that Islam, Christianty and Judaism the Abrahamic faiths share much with a faith called Zoroastrianism which is said to be the progenitor of Hinduism. Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrian

Also read this on Hinduism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

There are many parallels between the Abrahamic religions and Hinduism.

Also here it says that Jews just view Jesus as an insignificant figure at worst: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_view_of_Jesus

By Indians, probably Hindus? But whatever rocks your boat.

Jewish beliefs of Jesus

Some concepts are shared between Zoroastrianism and the Abrahamic faiths. That is different from saying "share much with a faith". Concept of Heaven, Hell, Satan is existant across all major religions, past and present.
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.

What does that have to do with anything? Stop preaching to me and trying to appease people.

Read the statement I bolded above. He thinks that Islamic fundamentalism is a good form of governance.

Tx for the preaching tho.

You can continue to go on like this forever and be part of the problem. If Hindus tell their kids that Muslims are evil and Muslims tell their kids that Hindus are evils then there will be no end to this. Fundamentalists of all religions are a problem and Hindus should work toward stopping Hindu fundamentalism by teaching our kids right as should Muslims stop Muslim fundamentalism by teaching their kids right.

If you are a real Hindu you would seek knowledge and act accordingly, here's a start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

You tell me where you read in the Bhagvad Gita that you should be so prejudiced and hateful? Don't become the very thing you hate and not know it. If you don't learn more about your religion and stop being so hateful, then you are no better than the people of other religions who do the same. If you still tell me I am preaching instead of learning about your own religion then you are beyond help.

I once knew a teacher in India, a Hindu, who had a poster in home that had the symbols of every religion on it and he believed truly in the peaceful co-existence of all religions. He would even have Ghazals in his home every week. His students were Hindu, Muslim and Christian. That is the sort Hindu you should aspire to be. Forget about the violence, it's already happened. It's all a result of bad teaching from parents to children and of bearing grudges. People in every religion need to stand up to fundamentalism and need to be encouraged to do so. If anything I hope that we all lost some amount of the latent fundmentalism we all have inside.

 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.

What does that have to do with anything? Stop preaching to me and trying to appease people.

Read the statement I bolded above. He thinks that Islamic fundamentalism is a good form of governance.

Tx for the preaching tho.

You can continue to go on like this forever and be part of the problem. If Hindus tell their kids that Muslims are evil and Muslims tell their kids that Hindus are evils then there will be no end to this. Fundamentalists of all religions are a problem and Hindus should work toward stopping Hindu fundamentalism by teaching our kids right as should Muslims stop Muslim fundamentalism by teaching their kids right.

If you are a real Hindu you would seek knowledge and act accordingly, here's a start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

You tell me where you read in the Bhagvad Gita that you should be so prejudiced and hateful? Don't become the very thing you hate and not know it. If you don't learn more about your religion and stop being so hateful, then you are no better than the people of other religions who do the same. If you still tell me I am preaching instead of learning about your own religion then you are beyond help.

I once knew a teacher in India, a Hindu, who had a poster in home that had the symbols of every religion on it and he believed truly in the peaceful co-existence of all religions. He would even have Ghazals in his home every week. His students were Hindu, Muslim and Christian. That is the sort Hindu you should aspire to be. Forget about the violence, it's already happened. It's all a result of bad teaching from parents to children and of bearing grudges. People in every religion need to stand up to fundamentalism and need to be encouraged to do so. If anything I hope that we all lost some amount of the latent fundmentalism we all have inside.

Kudos. As Gandhi taught his Hindu brethren, "Raise a Muslim orphan as a Muslim..."
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
^^^ That's pretty funny. My mom also told me that Hindus take Jesus as a Holy Figure. They say that one day even Gandhi will be considered "a God." What many people, even Hindus don't realize is that Hinduism is actually a monotheistic religion like Judaism, Islam and Christianity but the multiple "Gods" are just abstract concepts and the embodiment of qualities that are positive. Hinduism is a very complex religion and almost impossible to understand. Ironically I know far more about Catholicism than Hinduism as I went to Catholic school all my life. But I picked up a copy of the Bhagvad Gita a while back and found myself impressed. The message is pretty much the same. I found the same during my very brief readings in the Quran.

You are mistaken. Hinduism as such is not a unified religion. The word Hindu is derived from the Arabic word - Hind, which means beautiful. The Arabs called River Indus as Darya-Hind. The people across the river were collectively termed as Hindus. The beliefs were varied from tribe to tribe.

The religion can be viewed as monotheistic, trinitarion or polytheistic depending upon the Hindu you asked. The Bhagvad Gita itself speaks of multiple Gods and Rakshas/Asurs, etc.

Btw, I do not agree that Hindusim is impossible to understand. That would negate the entire concept of Hinduism being a religion.

Please dont tell me Hindus also believe Mohammad (SA) was an avatar of some God :D

What you heard was incorrect. Muslims believe Jesus/Isa (AS) is the second most important Prophet after Mohammad (SA). Jews on the other hand, as far as I have learned believe Jesus was the son of Satan. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all Abrahamic faiths. Jesus was sent to "correct" the Jews, while Mohammad (SA) brought the final message for all.

I believe you have a few misconceptions. Ultimately Hindusim is a monothestic religion and those Hindus who tell you otherwise have not properly understood it. The three main "Gods" are really just three basic aspects of the same unified God. The problem is that Hinduism does not have a single Holy Book that the supercedes any other. The Bhagvad Gita is the definitive Hindu Holy Book but one of many, it is just the most well known. There are Vedas in four groups that came before. This is what make Hinduism difficult to understand coupled with the fact that greedy Hindus changed the language of Hinduism so that the common man would not understand it properly and always rely on a priest (involving $$$) to perform whatever rites they need to. Remember in Hinduism the main goal is to reach Moksha which is the join the universal God or Universal spirit. There is only one God in Hinduism. Much of the mytholgy in Hinduism is actually just plain fiction designed to relate concepts in an easy to understand way, but unfortunately many people do not see that and find the religion very confusing.

Jews on the other hand do not despise Jesus, they just do not believe that Jesus was not the one the Moses spoke of as the coming of God to earth so they are still waiting for their prophet. They consider Jesus a good person, regardless of what happened around AD31. Some of them, again greedy, to keep power over their people were unhappy that they were losing their ranks to followers of Jesus and they decided to take action, hence the crucifixion. The enlightened Jew would not begrudge Jesus as Jesus was at the least a very good man, just not what they were looking for. Though there is always a little bit of that friction as they think that Christians are stupid and that they ended up following the wrong prophet. However they don't think Jesus was evil or that his followers were. If anything they hope that Christians one day see the error of their choice and pick the "real" prophet when the time comes. Until then they are supposed to peacefully co-exist.


A common theory exists that Islam, Christianty and Judaism the Abrahamic faiths share much with a faith called Zoroastrianism which is said to be the progenitor of Hinduism. Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrian

Also read this on Hinduism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

There are many parallels between the Abrahamic religions and Hinduism.

Also here it says that Jews just view Jesus as an insignificant figure at worst: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_view_of_Jesus

By Indians, probably Hindus? But whatever rocks your boat.

Jewish beliefs of Jesus

Some concepts are shared between Zoroastrianism and the Abrahamic faiths. That is different from saying "share much with a faith". Concept of Heaven, Hell, Satan is existant across all major religions, past and present.

I am Hindu and I can tell you that that site you have quoted does not tell the whole story. The use the term polytheism incorrect as they are probably referring to the multiple "Gods" that are associated with Hinduism but thos "Gods" are really just abstractions of Brahman the single God. Ultimately every time the vedas are quoted the single God is referred to as "Brahman." This term is something I have across many times as a Hindu. Sometimes these articles are written just to remind confused Hindus that there really is one God and not to be taken in so easily by the "multiple Gods" that they are so used to thinking of too literally. If you have actually seen the Vedic quotes you will see this quite clearly. The actual Vedas supercede a random website any day. I am telling you that Hinduism is a monotheistic religion. All those other "Gods" were created in mythology to explain things to people such as the concept of creation, destruction, and sustenance. I am a Hindu, this would be like me explaining Islam to you. You had a misunderstanding and I cleared it up, some Hindus may tell you that there are multiple Gods because they are clueless and have not come across the original Vedic teachings or even the Bhagvad Gita which serves as good summary. They are unable to see beyond the multiple statues and realize that they shouldn't be taking it so literally. This is what happens when the greedy priests choose not to explain anything to anyone so they can keep money for pujas and keep everyone in the dark.

As for the Jewish view of Jesus as a heretic, I knew you were going to bring that up. If you read the link I posted carefully, you will note that Jews don't believe that Jesus himself claimed to be the son of God, but that he was proclaimed so by his followers after he died. So they don't see him as a heretic as they believe that he himself did not make that claim. They were just unhappy at the time that he was taking followers away, now they don't care and see him as insignificant. I will ask a Jewish friend tomorrow. Now I am going to sleep.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
^^^ That's pretty funny. My mom also told me that Hindus take Jesus as a Holy Figure. They say that one day even Gandhi will be considered "a God." What many people, even Hindus don't realize is that Hinduism is actually a monotheistic religion like Judaism, Islam and Christianity but the multiple "Gods" are just abstract concepts and the embodiment of qualities that are positive. Hinduism is a very complex religion and almost impossible to understand. Ironically I know far more about Catholicism than Hinduism as I went to Catholic school all my life. But I picked up a copy of the Bhagvad Gita a while back and found myself impressed. The message is pretty much the same. I found the same during my very brief readings in the Quran.

You are mistaken. Hinduism as such is not a unified religion. The word Hindu is derived from the Arabic word - Hind, which means beautiful. The Arabs called River Indus as Darya-Hind. The people across the river were collectively termed as Hindus. The beliefs were varied from tribe to tribe.

The religion can be viewed as monotheistic, trinitarion or polytheistic depending upon the Hindu you asked. The Bhagvad Gita itself speaks of multiple Gods and Rakshas/Asurs, etc.

Btw, I do not agree that Hindusim is impossible to understand. That would negate the entire concept of Hinduism being a religion.

Please dont tell me Hindus also believe Mohammad (SA) was an avatar of some God :D

What you heard was incorrect. Muslims believe Jesus/Isa (AS) is the second most important Prophet after Mohammad (SA). Jews on the other hand, as far as I have learned believe Jesus was the son of Satan. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all Abrahamic faiths. Jesus was sent to "correct" the Jews, while Mohammad (SA) brought the final message for all.

I believe you have a few misconceptions. Ultimately Hindusim is a monothestic religion and those Hindus who tell you otherwise have not properly understood it. The three main "Gods" are really just three basic aspects of the same unified God. The problem is that Hinduism does not have a single Holy Book that the supercedes any other. The Bhagvad Gita is the definitive Hindu Holy Book but one of many, it is just the most well known. There are Vedas in four groups that came before. This is what make Hinduism difficult to understand coupled with the fact that greedy Hindus changed the language of Hinduism so that the common man would not understand it properly and always rely on a priest (involving $$$) to perform whatever rites they need to. Remember in Hinduism the main goal is to reach Moksha which is the join the universal God or Universal spirit. There is only one God in Hinduism. Much of the mytholgy in Hinduism is actually just plain fiction designed to relate concepts in an easy to understand way, but unfortunately many people do not see that and find the religion very confusing.

Jews on the other hand do not despise Jesus, they just do not believe that Jesus was not the one the Moses spoke of as the coming of God to earth so they are still waiting for their prophet. They consider Jesus a good person, regardless of what happened around AD31. Some of them, again greedy, to keep power over their people were unhappy that they were losing their ranks to followers of Jesus and they decided to take action, hence the crucifixion. The enlightened Jew would not begrudge Jesus as Jesus was at the least a very good man, just not what they were looking for. Though there is always a little bit of that friction as they think that Christians are stupid and that they ended up following the wrong prophet. However they don't think Jesus was evil or that his followers were. If anything they hope that Christians one day see the error of their choice and pick the "real" prophet when the time comes. Until then they are supposed to peacefully co-exist.


A common theory exists that Islam, Christianty and Judaism the Abrahamic faiths share much with a faith called Zoroastrianism which is said to be the progenitor of Hinduism. Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrian

Also read this on Hinduism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

There are many parallels between the Abrahamic religions and Hinduism.

Also here it says that Jews just view Jesus as an insignificant figure at worst: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_view_of_Jesus

By Indians, probably Hindus? But whatever rocks your boat.

Jewish beliefs of Jesus

Some concepts are shared between Zoroastrianism and the Abrahamic faiths. That is different from saying "share much with a faith". Concept of Heaven, Hell, Satan is existant across all major religions, past and present.

I am Hindu and I can tell you that that site you have quoted does not tell the whole story. The use the term polytheism incorrect as they are probably referring to the multiple "Gods" that are associated with Hinduism but thos "Gods" are really just abstractions of Brahman the single God. Ultimately every time the vedas are quoted the single God is referred to as "Brahman." This term is something I have across many times as a Hindu. Sometimes these articles are written just to remind confused Hindus that there really is one God and not to be taken in so easily by the "multiple Gods" that they are so used to thinking of too literally. If you have actually seen the Vedic quotes you will see this quite clearly. The actual Vedas supercede a random website any day. I am telling you that Hinduism is a monotheistic religion. All those other "Gods" were created in mythology to explain things to people such as the concept of creation, destruction, and sustenance. I am a Hindu, this would be like me explaining Islam to you. You had a misunderstanding and I cleared it up, some Hindus may tell you that there are multiple Gods because they are clueless and have not come across the original Vedic teachings or even the Bhagvad Gita which serves as good summary. They are unable to see beyond the multiple statues and realize that they shouldn't be taking it so literally. This is what happens when the greedy priests choose not to explain anything to anyone so they can keep money for pujas and keep everyone in the dark.

As for the Jewish view of Jesus as a heretic, I knew you were going to bring that up. If you read the link I posted carefully, you will note that Jews don't believe that Jesus himself claimed to be the son of God, but that he was proclaimed so by his followers after he died. So they don't see him as a heretic as they believe that he himself did not make that claim. They were just unhappy at the time that he was taking followers away, now they don't care and see him as insignificant. I will ask a Jewish friend tomorrow. Now I am going to sleep.

My hindu buddy here, Mr. Saurabh Patel confirms my original opinion. He is a Hindu as well. Who should I listen to?

As for Jesus, your edit did not come up till I posted. Muslims also believe Jesus was not the son of God but a Prophet. Ask your Jewish friend tomorrow for the truth and not the politically correct thing to say.
 

mAdMaLuDaWg

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2003
2,437
1
0
Originally posted by: Sultan

The Chinese communist government also lacks legitimacy. Your point? China is the second strongest economy. What makes that a failure? Care to like actually back up your argument rather than present false logic?

Funny, I never heard of a poll in Pakistan regarding Musharraf's approval. Glad to know you're creating that figment of your imagination :roll:

While I don't have a link to the poll, my friend in Pakistan tells me that there is a great discontent among the Pakistani public on how the dictator has handled the emergency response of the quake.

Wow Sultan, I guess there is a huge disconnect on what most of us here on this board consider what 'sucess' actually is. To us, a success is a state where human rights among all sections of society whether they subscribe to a religion or not is protected, whether people have a say in the laws that govern them, and whether the rights of women are on equal footing with that of men. To you, a country's economic strength may be the sole factor of determining what a sucessful country is.. but to people who are being arrested simply for professing their faith or to the women who can't go out in public without a man by her side, money is the least of their concern. Maybe money is most important to you, but to a lot of us on this board its not.

Do you know any Chinese Americans? Ask them about China. I'm assuming you know how to use google right. Why don't you do searches on human rights abuses and religous persecution in China. My Chinese friend risked his life last year to goto a Chinese village just so that he could help the village with education and practicing religion. His family has personally witnessed how people are tortured simply for practicing their faith. Yup great country indeed.. why don't you go live in China if it is such a success.


 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
Originally posted by: catnap1972
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/10/29/india.explosion/index.html

I'd be dollars to doughnuts it was more Muslim extremists.

From either Iran or Syria, no doubt...

oh, really? "no doubt," huh?

i love it when people don't know jack shet about stuff...

please tell me why in the hell it would "no doubt" be iran or syria.... other than, "well, that's what the media likes feeding me; iran and syria are evil!!!"

kindly shut your jackhole and quit breeding ignorance.
 

athithi

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2002
1,717
0
0
sxr7171,

On one hand you have Sultan who claims that fundamentalist Islam is a viable form of governance. On the other hand you have Indians talking about the importance of secularism and democracy. You pop into the middle and start talking about how we should be tolerant of each other :confused: I think you are entirely missing the point of discussion. Let me put it in very simple words for you - India's form of government is good - people have a choice. The govt itself might not be good. People have a choice. People change government. Relatively successful Hindu Nationalist Party, BJP - people chose to change. People can even choose the Chinese model if they want - ergo, Communist Party of India forms part of Government. When people don't like, people change that too. People have choice and choice is good. Now, Pakistan - Army General without telling anybody sends military across Line of Control. Army General without Govt. approval starts big fight with neighbour. Prime Minister called by American master to DC and told to withdraw Army. Prime Minister tries to kill Army General. Army General takes over country. People of Pakistan, soundly fvcked up the ass one more time.

Where do you see the hatred from me towards Muslims here? Where do you see any sort of equality of even comparability between India and Pakistan here? I am simply talking about the respective Governments, how they were formed and by whom.
 

mOeeOm

Platinum Member
Dec 27, 2004
2,588
0
0
Originally posted by: mAdMaLuDaWg
Originally posted by: Sultan

The Chinese communist government also lacks legitimacy. Your point? China is the second strongest economy. What makes that a failure? Care to like actually back up your argument rather than present false logic?

Funny, I never heard of a poll in Pakistan regarding Musharraf's approval. Glad to know you're creating that figment of your imagination :roll:

While I don't have a link to the poll, my friend in Pakistan tells me that there is a great discontent among the Pakistani public on how the dictator has handled the emergency response of the quake.

Wow Sultan, I guess there is a huge disconnect on what most of us here on this board consider what 'sucess' actually is. To us, a success is a state where human rights among all sections of society whether they subscribe to a religion or not is protected, whether people have a say in the laws that govern them, and whether the rights of women are on equal footing with that of men. To you, a country's economic strength may be the sole factor of determining what a sucessful country is.. but to people who are being arrested simply for professing their faith or to the women who can't go out in public without a man by her side, money is the least of their concern. Maybe money is most important to you, but to a lot of us on this board its not.

Do you know any Chinese Americans? Ask them about China. I'm assuming you know how to use google right. Why don't you do searches on human rights abuses and religous persecution in China. My Chinese friend risked his life last year to goto a Chinese village just so that he could help the village with education and practicing religion. His family has personally witnessed how people are tortured simply for practicing their faith. Yup great country indeed.. why don't you go live in China if it is such a success.

People need to be kept in line. They don't know whats good for them, so the government takes the liberty of making the choice for them.











































































:)
 

mAdMaLuDaWg

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2003
2,437
1
0
You know the biggest irony of it all athithi, Sultan claims that a Fundamentalist government is a viable form of government and that democracy is not the best form of government. I wonder why he chooses to live in the United States and not under a dictator or in an Islamic country... afterall, they are, according to him,'successful' states.

I dare you, Sultan, to goto China and start posting on these message boards that Chinese Communist model sucks or to congregate in a mosque to pray on a regular basis out in the open. The very freedoms that you are taking for granted right now are being denied in some of your 'favorite' forms of government.

 

mOeeOm

Platinum Member
Dec 27, 2004
2,588
0
0
Originally posted by: mAdMaLuDaWg
You know the biggest irony of it all athithi, Sultan claims that a Fundamentalist government is a viable form of government and that democracy is not the best form of government. I wonder why he chooses to live in the United States and not under a dictator or in an Islamic country... afterall, they are, according to him,'successful' states.

I dare you, Sultan, to goto China and start posting on these message boards that Chinese Communist model sucks or to congregate in a mosque to pray on a regular basis out in the open. The very freedoms that you are taking for granted right now are being denied in some of your 'favorite' forms of government.

Its not as bad as you think, imo its better than democracy.

My whole family is moving to Saudi Arabia.....does that count? They are a fundamentalist government and I can't wait to go.
 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Jave
Originally posted by: raildogg
Pakistan is basically America's poodle in the war on terror. Little does America know that Pakistan in fact is its #1 enemy and the cause of 9/11 in the first place. But short term gains are often put ahead of long term gains. Why are we going after Iran's nuclear program when a radicalized muslim country like Pakistan already has nukes? What if muslim extremists get a hold of these weapons?

Even Pakistan's leaders have said in the past that they will use nuclear weapons against India in a first strike. That will mean total obliteration of Pakistan by India, but these people are a bit twisted in the head. I really do believe that the attacks on the Indian parliament a few months after 9/11 were coordinated by Pakistan's ISI and these new attacks were likely the same.

But yes, Pakistan is America's ally.

I agree with you on this one "Pakistan is basically America's poodle", whether its war on terror or war against USSR or any other element of US policy. Thats where I wish Pakistan would adapt a policy to take care of its own people first rather than pleasing or following US foreign policy.
Regarding Pakistan using nukes first, only one Indian nuke would be enough to evaporate entire Pakistan but Pakistan can only do some damage. So, the argument of Pakistan using nuke first is just propaganda.
Indian has been supporting seperatists in Pakistan for years, they trained and supported and sided with Russia. India needs to give the People of Kashmir the right to choose according to the UN resolutions they agreed to. But again they are master of propganda just like Nixon said.

Kashmir will side with India and the sanatana dharma.

Secularism will always defeat the forces of Religious fascism.

Then what are they afraid of. Let the People of Kashmir decide and put an end to this terrorism.

There is no such thing as "Secularism", may be a fancy word. I in reality "Might (or its sidekick) is always right." India will always have Laws which will blindly favor the majority religion, just like Pakistan.

That's why they have reservation (similar to affirmative action) for minorities in India; Muslims and Christians are part of it. That's also why Muslims have at least as much representation in legislative bodies as they have in population. That's also why they allow Muslims to have their own courts according to Islamic law. It's also why Muslims are so prosperous in India when it comes to industry and land ownership. Muslims were basically given land to get a headstart in India after partition. India is a democracy and not a thinly disguised theocracy. I'd like to see what kind of warm welcome Hindus get in Pakistan.

Another misfit who is fixated by Pakistan. I hope the following is SOME evidence of how Indians were received in Pakistan: An Indian's travel to Pakistan in 2004.

And lets not forget how Pakistan was received in India in 2005, with stones being hurled at the cricket team's bus :roll:

Actually I have no fixation at all with Pakistan, perhaps I had a misunderstanding as you seem to have about India. I have quite a few Muslim friends including some very close ones, 2 of these friends are Pakistani. So I really couldn't give a damn if someone is from Pakistan or not. Sometimes we are led to believe things that are not true from what we hear from people. I wouldn't mind visiting Karachi as I hope you don't mind visiting Delhi, Hyderabad or Bombay. If anything I think I'd enjoy the Haleem out there. A lot can be accomplished if everyone gets these misconceptions out of their heads.

No, unlike the Indian misfits here, I harbor no negative feelings against India. I have a lot of family in India. However, I will answer all claims against Muslims or against a Muslim nation by pointing out comparable similarities in the relative country/culture/religion.

I noticed you hardly commented on an Indian Hindus welcome in Pakistan :roll:

No nation is free of faults. Nor the followers of a religion. While the "misfits" attempt to deride my side, I attempt to show that the same exists on their sides. Period.


Why do you give me the roll eyes so fast? I hadn't read it at the time. I just read it and I'm happy to note and change my misconception of Pakistan. It was a refreshing read from what I'm used to hearing.

You do realize this guy is preaching Islamic fundamentalism right? Gain some confidence.


I seriously think it is time for both sides to step back and look at where our own faults are before automatically blaming the other side first. I don't want to repeat an oft-repeated cliche but I am forced to: "it takes 2 hands to make a clap."


The thing with religion that is dangerous (and this applies to every religion) is that it tends to get corrupted and bent and misused by greedy people who stand to gain from that corruption. It happens in Christianity, Islam and even in Hinduism. If people went back to their Holy Books and actually read it I'm sure every religion says basically the same thing. I think that if take any religion in it's pure form and model a society around it, it will be a good society. This is because every religion in its pure form preaches religious tolerance.

What does that have to do with anything? Stop preaching to me and trying to appease people.

Read the statement I bolded above. He thinks that Islamic fundamentalism is a good form of governance.

Tx for the preaching tho.

You can continue to go on like this forever and be part of the problem. If Hindus tell their kids that Muslims are evil and Muslims tell their kids that Hindus are evils then there will be no end to this. Fundamentalists of all religions are a problem and Hindus should work toward stopping Hindu fundamentalism by teaching our kids right as should Muslims stop Muslim fundamentalism by teaching their kids right.

If you are a real Hindu you would seek knowledge and act accordingly, here's a start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism

You tell me where you read in the Bhagvad Gita that you should be so prejudiced and hateful? Don't become the very thing you hate and not know it. If you don't learn more about your religion and stop being so hateful, then you are no better than the people of other religions who do the same. If you still tell me I am preaching instead of learning about your own religion then you are beyond help.

I once knew a teacher in India, a Hindu, who had a poster in home that had the symbols of every religion on it and he believed truly in the peaceful co-existence of all religions. He would even have Ghazals in his home every week. His students were Hindu, Muslim and Christian. That is the sort Hindu you should aspire to be. Forget about the violence, it's already happened. It's all a result of bad teaching from parents to children and of bearing grudges. People in every religion need to stand up to fundamentalism and need to be encouraged to do so. If anything I hope that we all lost some amount of the latent fundmentalism we all have inside.

Not a Hindu, not a Jew, not a Muslim, not a Christian, not a Buddhist. I'm just getting tired of Islamic nutjobs preaching fundamentalism.

Very soon they will have enemies all along the political spectrum because most people believe in the ideals of freedom and democracy.

You seem to have huge reading comprehension problems man. I've stated many times that I'm white.
 

CHOPPER GOD

Senior member
Apr 14, 2005
214
0
0
Originally posted by: johnnobts
How could you assume the Religion of Peace would ever commit acts like this?!

LOL, by the way, common misconception most Muslims don't even try to correct. The Word Islam does not mean or even imply peace. The root word SLM in Hebrew means peace, but Islam in arabic SLM means servant or slave. Slaves or servants to the will of Allah. Muslims don't correct this b/c they like the positive press. Not much peaceful about Islam if you actually read the Qu'ran.

You are right...Now how much for the slushee?
 

standard141

Member
Jun 11, 2005
91
0
0
Originally posted by: CHOPPER GOD

You are right...Now how much for the slushee?

listen you racist prick if it werent for indians who would your doctor be? white yeah i dont think so buddy
 
Apr 17, 2005
13,465
3
81
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: mAdMaLuDaWg
You know the biggest irony of it all athithi, Sultan claims that a Fundamentalist government is a viable form of government and that democracy is not the best form of government. I wonder why he chooses to live in the United States and not under a dictator or in an Islamic country... afterall, they are, according to him,'successful' states.

I dare you, Sultan, to goto China and start posting on these message boards that Chinese Communist model sucks or to congregate in a mosque to pray on a regular basis out in the open. The very freedoms that you are taking for granted right now are being denied in some of your 'favorite' forms of government.

Its not as bad as you think, imo its better than democracy.

My whole family is moving to Saudi Arabia.....does that count? They are a fundamentalist government and I can't wait to go.




good riddance