• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Terrorist thugs = evil bastid cowards

New York Daily News - http://www.nydailynews.com
Iraq horror on tape
BY MAGGIE HABERMAN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Monday, December 27th, 2004

A sickening video claiming to show last week's Mosul mess-tent bombing - including a fireball bursting skyward - hit the Internet yesterday, courtesy of the Iraqi terror thugs responsible for the attack.

The video shows three black-hooded men - one of whom appears to be the suicide bomber - talking a day before the attack about carrying out their plan with maximum carnage by slipping onto the base during a guard change at lunchtime.

"We have been observing their schedule for a long time," a gunman flanked by the other two says, reading from a statement before bidding farewell to the apparent suicide bomber.

The three are believed to be members of the Ansar al-Sunnah Army, the terror group that claimed responsibility for last Tuesday's blast at Forward .Operating Base Marez that left 22 dead and dozens others injured.

Last week, they promised to release a video of the attack.

The video begins with the three black-clad, gun-toting masked men sitting in front of a black banner bearing the group's name.

That footage is date-stamped Dec. 20, a day before the attack.

On the left is a man wearing an explosives belt - apparently the suicide bomber, identified as Abu Omar al-Mosuli on the video, though no other information is given about him.

"One of the lions from our martyrdom-seeking brothers will infiltrate the defenses of the enemy at the Marez base in Mosul," a gunman says. "He will slip through a hole in the camp's wire, exploiting the changing of the guard.

"This lion will then proceed to his target, and he will take advantage of lunchtime, when the dining hall is crowded with the crusaders and their [Iraqi] allies," the gunman says. "The operation will then be carried out."

"Let [President] Bush, [British Prime Minister Tony] Blair and [Iraqi Interim Prime Minister Iyad] Allawi know that we are coming and that we will chase them all away, God willing."

The speaker and the third man embrace al-Mosuli.

Then, the footage cuts to a gunman holding a crude blueprint of the military base, with one section scrawled over in .Arabic, "the dining hall." The gunman points out different sites using a large knife.

The footage then jumps a day and records a grainy image of the base. Haunting music plays, and then a fireball streaks from a white tent amid a huge boom. The last images are motion shots of a car driving away, past the mess hall, with a massive gash in its roof.

Today, a car bomb exploded outside the Baghdad offices of one of Iraq's leading Shi'ite Muslim political parties, killing five and wounding 15 people, party officials and witnesses said.

"The car exploded at the gate to the offices, near the reception area," one official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We took several guards and receptionists to the hospital."

War update

# A roadside bomb hit a U.S. military convoy in Mosul consisting of two Humvees and a supply truck, injuring three U.S. soldiers.

# Iraq's electoral commission is considering setting aside seats in the country's National Assembly for Sunni Arab politicians and other groups if their supporters don't vote in the country's Jan. 30 elections because the supporters fear attacks by insurgents.

# The U.S. military death toll reached 1,323 yesterday since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003. At least 1,034 of them died as a result of hostile action, the Pentagon said.

# The head of Iraq's armed forces said Tuesday's deadly suicide bombing on a U.S. base was not carried out by a member of Iraq's security forces. A U.S. general had earlier suggested there may have been infiltration into the Iraqi armed forces.

# In Baghdad, masked gunmen assassinated a high-ranking Iraqi police officer, Col. Yassin Ibrahim Jawad, and wounded his two bodyguards, police said.

# El Salvador, the only country in the Western Hemisphere other than the U.S. with soldiers still in the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq, may extend its troop deployment beyond a scheduled return early next year, El Salvador's president said.

With News Wire Services
Link

I say kill them all!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
What an entire waste of time this campaign has been. Dammit Fuel cells/hydrogen/ect were always an option!
 
Wait what. How is a legitmate attack on military personnel a terrorist attack? Soldiers have an expectation that they may die whenever. If you haven't noticed, this is war.
 
Originally posted by: AnImuS
What an entire waste of time this campaign has been. Dammit Fuel cells/hydrogen/ect were always an option!

Hydrogen fuel cells is a huge red herring.

1. We don't have enough platinum, which serves as the only catalyst viable for a fuel cell at the moment.
2. Hydrogen is derived from fossil fuels via extraction methods. A gallon of gasoline has more hydrogen than a gallon of hydrogen ironically.
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: raildogg

I say kill them all!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't worry I bet they say the same thing about you.

Could care less what they say. I would rather have terrorists hate me than love me

If they loved you they wouldn't try to kill you.

EDIT: according to everyone's good friend Machieveli, it is better to be loved than hated/despised.
 
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Wait what. How is a legitmate attack on military personnel a terrorist attack? Soldiers have an expectation that they may die whenever. If you haven't noticed, this is war.

First, they were eating during lunchtime, not that it matters to them or to you , who seems to be on the side of the terrorists. These evil low lives dont realize that they are hurting their fellow Arabs.

Second, the war is over in Iraq in terms of military to military fighting, but there are plenty of rats which need to hunted down and killed.
 
So as soon as soldiers are eating; they become civilians? I don't see the logic. It's a battlefield. Soldiers are legitmate targets no matter what.

George Washington attacked German mercenaries during a Christmas party; does that make him a terrorist?

I also don't recall a surrender nor an end to hostilites declared nor an armstice. Just because GWB says Mission Accomplished doesn't mean it is.
 
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
So as soon as soldiers are eating; they become civilians? I don't see the logic. It's a battlefield. Soldiers are legitmate targets no matter what.

George Washington attacked German mercenaries during a Christmas party; does that make him a terrorist?


Your arguement can easily be defended by comparing these two situations:

1) U.S dropping bombs on enemies while they are sleeping, etc. Israel does this all the time.
2) Bomber in that video

Then I ask this. What are they fighting for?
 
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
So as soon as soldiers are eating; they become civilians? I don't see the logic. It's a battlefield. Soldiers are legitmate targets no matter what.

George Washington attacked German mercenaries during a Christmas party; does that make him a terrorist?

I also don't recall a surrender nor an end to hostilites declared nor an armstice. Just because GWB says Mission Accomplished doesn't mean it is.

good points
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Wait what. How is a legitmate attack on military personnel a terrorist attack? Soldiers have an expectation that they may die whenever. If you haven't noticed, this is war.

First, they were eating during lunchtime, not that it matters to them or to you , who seems to be on the side of the terrorists. These evil low lives dont realize that they are hurting their fellow Arabs.

Second, the war is over in Iraq in terms of military to military fighting, but there are plenty of rats which need to hunted down and killed.


bush is as much a terrorist as any of them. The us soldiers, no, they are following orders. The nutjob at the helm, yes.
 
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Wait what. How is a legitmate attack on military personnel a terrorist attack? Soldiers have an expectation that they may die whenever. If you haven't noticed, this is war.

If done in uniform with a national flag. I've been reading a lot of indian war history lately and the Apache warriors (as much as I hate to say it) sounded a bit like these maniacs. They made the same sort of statements and used a lot of ceremony before and during an attack. They were ruthless too. Unfortunately, the rest is history.

 
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Wait what. How is a legitmate attack on military personnel a terrorist attack? Soldiers have an expectation that they may die whenever. If you haven't noticed, this is war.

First, they were eating during lunchtime, not that it matters to them or to you , who seems to be on the side of the terrorists. These evil low lives dont realize that they are hurting their fellow Arabs.

Second, the war is over in Iraq in terms of military to military fighting, but there are plenty of rats which need to hunted down and killed.

:cookie:
 
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: raildogg

I say kill them all!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't worry I bet they say the same thing about you.

Could care less what they say. I would rather have terrorists hate me than love me

If they loved you they wouldn't try to kill you.

EDIT: according to everyone's good friend Machieveli, it is better to be loved than hated/despised.

:cookie:
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
I say kill them all!!!!!!!!!!!!
:thumbsup:

I would qualify that however, by first trying to separate the good Iraqi citizens from the terrorists. But if that is not possible, then I could live with the sacrifice of their lives to get rid of the terrorists. We are at war defending ourselves and war is hell. Sometimes it is necessary to kill civilians to win the war.
 
Originally posted by: HalosPuma
Originally posted by: raildogg
I say kill them all!!!!!!!!!!!!
:thumbsup:

I would qualify that however, by first trying to separate the good Iraqi citizens from the terrorists. But if that is not possible, then I could live with the sacrifice of their lives to get rid of the terrorists. We are at war defending ourselves and war is hell. Sometimes it is necessary to kill civilians to win the war.

Especially if they aren't White Christian Men..right Hamas?
 
Originally posted by: wchou
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: raildogg

I say kill them all!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't worry I bet they say the same thing about you.

Could care less what they say. I would rather have terrorists hate me than love me

If they loved you they wouldn't try to kill you.

EDIT: according to everyone's good friend Machieveli, it is better to be loved than hated/despised.

:cookie:

:cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie::cookie:
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Especially if they aren't White Christian Men..right Hamas?
Just whose side are you own Red Dawn? Our boys are getting killed in Iraq. The terrorists are making life hell for the legitimate Iraqi citizens. We need to kill them all (the terrorists). It is the cold, hard truth that some civilians will die in a war. But that choice is better than taking no action at all. We are stabilizing the Middle East not only for ourselves, but for the rest of the world.
 
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Wait what. How is a legitmate attack on military personnel a terrorist attack? Soldiers have an expectation that they may die whenever. If you haven't noticed, this is war.

I'll just concede your retarded point so I can point something else out. How about when they kill the innocent civilians or behead people and videotape it? Is that "legitimate" too? If I didn't know better, I'd think you were a terrorist yourself...isn't Omar a muslim name?
 
Originally posted by: HalosPuma
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Especially if they aren't White Christian Men..right Hamas?
Just whose side are you own Red Dawn? Our boys are getting killed in Iraq. The terrorists are making life hell for the legitimate Iraqi citizens. We need to kill them all (the terrorists). It is the cold, hard truth that some civilians will die in a war. But that choice is better than taking no action at all. We are stabilizing the Middle East not only for ourselves, but for the rest of the world.
I'm on the soldiers side, I would be on your side if you would decide to join and go fight. I'm 100% behind you Hamas!

FYI I don't give a sh!t about the Iraqi's, whether they are terrorists or not. I sure wouldn't sacrifices one American life (you can be the exception) for their freedom, that's something they should have done themselves. The only reason I supported the Dub's ill advised excellent adventure into Iraq in the first place is I made a poor judgement call and believed him and his handlers when they BS'd us about Saddam having vast quantities of WMD's . If he would have been up front and said he was going in there to free those **** from the tyranny of Hussien I would have done what most Americans would have done if told the actual truth, not supported it.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Wait what. How is a legitmate attack on military personnel a terrorist attack? Soldiers have an expectation that they may die whenever. If you haven't noticed, this is war.

If I didn't know better, I'd think you were a terrorist yourself...isn't Omar a muslim name?
Are you and HalosPuma buddies?


 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm on the soldiers side
:thumbsup:

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If he would have been up front and said he was going in there to free those **** from the tyranny of Hussien I would have done what most Americans would have done if told the actual truth, not supported it.
I never did believe the WMD or liberation reasons. We went in there for our interests of national security to stabilize that part of the world and secure our oil supplies.
 
Back
Top