• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Terrorist attempts to blow up Federal Reserve Bank

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
SunnyD said:
Would this not be entrapment? I mean seriously - if the feds didn't provide him with the "materials", he likely would never have attempted to commit the act.
Click to expand...

With anything BUT terrorism yes. But since they label it terrorism they will get to put him away for 20-30 years.
 
halik said:
Yeah, but if the premise is that central banks play role in increasing sovereign debt, it would be present in all economies with central banks (logically). Since it's not the case, the underlying driver indebtedness must be something else. IIRC Nixons spending in Vietnam (that among another was the reason why gold standard went away) is what got the ball rolling in the 70s and WW2 was the reason before that.
Click to expand...

Actually, before the central bank, it was monarchy. So if we just look strictly at your charts base on the timeline of when the central bank was created and the level of sovereign debt, then it definitely has risen, regardless of cause.

Yes we did spend, but guess who lend us the money? Remember, our central bank and the UK is essentially one in the same, hence the same trend. And it was created for the same purpose, by the same entities.
 
Awww... the adult discussion stops when somebody questions why the government is supplying otherwise incapable people w\ the means to become terrorists..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top