Terminator 1, 2, 3...

[BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by: spunkz
4 was bad bad bad bad bad bad

this

 

[zerocool84]

Originally posted by: Fox5
2 > 1 > 3.
4 shouldn't have existed. It was so horrible. At least 3 was formulaic with a twist ending. 4 was just stupid. Sure, they tie everything together in the end.......in the most moronic way possible. If 3's ending was the saving grace of the movie, 4's ending sent it to the depths of hell. The movie could easily be made better by removing scenes near the end.

Yea 3 was at least an enjoyable action movie. 4 just downright disappointed me.

 

[Schadenfroh]

2 >>> 1 > 3 >>>> 4

 

[BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
2 >>> 1 > 3 >>>> 4

A very accurate scale IMO. People putting 4 in front of 3 are either diluting themselves or haven't really seen 4 yet.

 

[RagingBITCH]

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
2 >>> 1 > 3 >>>> 4

Um, WHAT? 3 was absolute garbage. Over the top, cheese. Over the top sh!ttiness! 4 was way over what 3 is. Probably better than 1.

So many people hold 1 in such high regard, especially over 2. Why? The over the top violence get to you? It was good, but 2 is the candlestick upon which all Terminator movies will be measured against. Period.

 

[imported_Imp]

Originally posted by: l0cke
T2 > T1 > T:SCC > T4 > T3

T1 and SCC might be tied actually.

That's about my ranking.

 

[rh71]

2 was best but overplayed.. I don't really enjoy it that much anymore. I will definitely watch if any of the others come on randomly.

 

[darkxshade]

3 > 4 > 1 > 2

/ducks

 

[sandorski]

2-1-3, I thought 3 was just fine. Haven't seen 4 yet.