That's the best part. It doesn't have to be his own money. It can be money borrowed from the bank or investors and he can still transfer it to himself. So whoever the money came from gets screwed and he gets to actually profit from it by avoiding any taxes for years. So he doesn't lose anything in 1995 or loses little but gets the break for the entire amount.What I am not getting is unless he personally had $943M at one time before losing them all, how is he allowed to claim that as a loss on his personal income tax?
I agree that tax laws don't have to make any sense but this sure looks like double dipping because the investors who fronted the $943M are the ones who had the loss.
I do not believe that Donald even had $943M prior to1995 to be able to lose that much.
What I am not getting is unless he personally had $943M at one time before losing them all, how is he allowed to claim that as a loss on his personal income tax?
I agree that tax laws don't have to make any sense but this sure looks like double dipping because the investors who fronted the $943M are the ones who had the loss.
I do not believe that Donald even had $943M prior to1995 to be able to lose that much.
Interesting what Isana has to say about his genius.That's the best part. It doesn't have to be his own money. It can be money borrowed from the bank or investors and he can still transfer it to himself. So whoever the money came from gets screwed and he gets to actually profit from it by avoiding any taxes for years. So he doesn't lose anything in 1995 or loses little but gets the break for the entire amount.
I wish I had studied tax laws rather than engineering to understand the following which claims to show how he must have done this.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...s-is-how-trump-lost-916m-and-avoided-tax.html
A very interesting read! I wonder if Trump disclosed to the prospective investors in Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts, BEFORE they made payment, that the future tax benefits of the properties had already been stripped out and used for Trump's personal benefit.
Edit: The problem with incidents like this is that they're very, very difficult to explain to low-information voters. About all that could easily be reported is that Trump claimed a personal loss of almost a billion dollars that instead should have been equally shared by the investors in this properties. The result of which was that Trump made a huge profit (because of the enormous tax savings he was able to claim) and his investors lost everything.