• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Temash A6-1450 review

E

Enigmoid

Platinum Member
Finally a review from a more reputable site (though they seem to love synthetics).

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-AMD-A6-1450-APU-Temash.92264.0.html


Fairly good for its tdp.

GPU seems quite good but the cpu holds it back horribly.


- low med. high
Battlefield 3 (2011) - 10.3 7.8 6 fps
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) - 14.4 9.2 5.9 fps
Anno 2070 (2011) - 28.7 12.2 7.8 fps
Diablo III (2012) - 26.1 16.4 13.8 fps
Dirt Showdown (2012) - 15.9 12.6 11.5 fps
Sleeping Dogs (2012) - 16 12.8 5.8 fps
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) - 17.4 14.3 11.9 fps
Dishonored (2012) - 16.2 13.1 11.6 fps
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012) - 20.2 14.1 6.9 fps
Hitman: Absolution (2012) - 9 7.4 4.8 fps
Crysis 3 (2013) - 9.2 5.6 3.7 fps
Tomb Raider (2013) - 20 10.3 7.1 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) - 19 9.4 7.8 fps

Not a single playable game (maybe anno and diablo but thats at 1024x768 low)
 
Last edited:
Not impressed. CPU is way to slow.


Didn't they show this game playing Dirt 3 at 1080p? Why is Dirt Showdown running like a slideshow?
 
A little disappointing TBH. I agree with the review where they say AMD should have stuck to two faster cores instead of 4 slower ones.
 
The low CPU performance, in more detail the low performance per core, slows down the graphics card in many games. We want to illustrate this with an example:
Click to expand...

Makes me think on the PS4.
 
What a shitload of skewed BS guys - man up!

This is a tablet APU.

This cpu have 80% better ipc than Atom. Probably in the order of 200% better fpu performance. And in the order of 3-400% percent better gpu performance than Atom. And working drivers - Try to execute those games on Atom. All with southbridge integrated. All in a small and dirt cheap package that can compete with arm.

You want to prove this tablet can not play metro? LOL. Get serious, and keep the post and the link to the proper thread. There is no need to repeat yesterdays news here Enigmoid.
 
Me thinks both the cpu and gpu are throttling under gaming loads as the chip is hitting a hard TDP limit. The PS4 will not have the same issue.
 
krumme said:
What a shitload of skewed BS guys - man up!

This is a tablet APU.

This cpu have 80% better ipc than Atom. Probably in the order of 200% better fpu performance. And in the order of 3-400% percent better gpu performance than Atom. And working drivers - Try to execute those games on Atom. All with southbridge integrated. All in a small and dirt cheap package that can compete with arm.

You want to prove this tablet can not play metro? LOL. Get serious, and keep the post and the link to the proper thread. There is no need to repeat yesterdays news here Enigmoid.
Click to expand...

It's disappointing because it's an unbalanced APU, they are starving the GPU with the low clocks. Why use a powerful GPU with such a slow CPU? Isn't that a waste of transistors?
 
krumme said:
This is a tablet APU.
Click to expand...

I failed to see your point. They didn't test tablet. They tested notebook (although with touch screen). So it makes sense to compare it to notebooks. There is no point to compare this specific APU to atom based tablets at all as it's missing some essential tablet features (such as low power Si0x states and low enough TDP which allows fanless tablet design).
 
Last edited:
Madpacket said:
It's disappointing because it's an unbalanced APU, they are starving the GPU with the low clocks. Why use a powerful GPU with such a slow CPU? Isn't that a waste of transistors?
Click to expand...

There is a 2 GHz version of the same chip - this is the slowest version of the full APU. There will be lower power versions with two cores and only one graphics compute unit.

This one is unbalanced but the fastest chip will be a lot better.
 
LogOver said:
I failed to see your point. They didn't tested tablet. They tested notebook (although with touch screen). So it makes sense to compare it to notebooks. There is no point to compare this specific APU to atom based tablets at all as it's missing some essential tablet features (such as low power Si0x states and low enough TDP which allows fanless tablet design).
Click to expand...

We have already seen Temash in fanless tablets - it cannot turbo to 1.4 GHz without the turbo dock. This is a notebook capable of 1.4 GHz which is why it has a fan.
 
SiliconWars said:
We have already seen Temash in fanless tablets - it cannot turbo to 1.4 GHz without the turbo dock. This is a notebook capable of 1.4 GHz which is why it has a fan.
Click to expand...

According to the review, this APU consumes >6W running Prime (cores at 1Ghz) and ~11W running Prime+FurMark (cores at 0.85GHz). There is no chance 4 cores are going into fanless design. Maybe 2 cores APU.
Any way this specific APU is rather targeting notebooks than tablets.
 
LogOver said:
They tested notebook (although with touch screen). So it makes sense to compare it to notebooks.
Click to expand...

I can see your point. But I think you're failing to realize just how many Brazos-based notebooks there are out there. This A6 is faster then most Brazos-based notebooks out there. Brazos is even being used on 15.6" notebooks, and they seem quite popular, not least due to their extreme low cost. That's something an awful lot of people care about, they don't care as much for performance... :whiste:
 
LogOver said:
According to the review, this APU consumes >6W running Prime (cores at 1Ghz) and ~11W running Prime+FurMark (cores at 0.85GHz). There is no chance 4 cores are going into fanless design. Maybe 2 cores APU.
Any way this specific APU is rather targeting notebooks than tablets.
Click to expand...

The system consumes +6W running Prime95. While running FurMark - which is a power virus and shouldn't be used anyway - the system consumes 11W more.

Clearly the graphics are using up a lot more power than the cpu is, but the graphics are overclocked by 60% over what they'll be in tablet mode - that's going to use up a lot of power.

I'm sure we will see the 1450 in tablets - the best binned cpu's no doubt but that's how it works.
 
krumme said:
What a shitload of skewed BS guys - man up!

This is a tablet APU.

This cpu have 80% better ipc than Atom. Probably in the order of 200% better fpu performance. And in the order of 3-400% percent better gpu performance than Atom. And working drivers - Try to execute those games on Atom. All with southbridge integrated. All in a small and dirt cheap package that can compete with arm.

You want to prove this tablet can not play metro? LOL. Get serious, and keep the post and the link to the proper thread. There is no need to repeat yesterdays news here Enigmoid.
Click to expand...

Yeah but the atom z2760 is using a lot less power (think 3-4 watts).

Probably the most relevant power test is 3dmark 06, almost 20 watts. Idles at ~10 watts, The soc is using 9 watts here.

9 watts is pretty high for a tablet (probably going to require a fan or something).

The problem with this chip is that its using too much power for a tablet and isn't quite powerful enough for a notebook.

Given its target market and thermal considerations they should have released a dual core and the same gpu and actually had the dual core reach the 1.4 ghz turbo consistently.
 
You are also forgetting this is AMD's first APU silicon on 28nm node 😉. With time the power/thermal specs will be improved and I expect new models with lower TDP spec or higher clocks in Q3 or Q4.
 
inf64 said:
You are also forgetting this is AMD's first APU silicon on 28nm node 😉. With time the power/thermal specs will be improved and I expect new models with lower TDP spec or higher clocks in Q3 or Q4.
Click to expand...

Hopefully AMD can take advantage of the time gap between the release of temesh and silvermont to actually get some product design wins, because this seems like a pretty decent APU.
 
ST performance on cinebench for the 1.4GHz jaguar core gives half the score as the 2.6GHz piledriver core from trinity (if turbo actually works as expected)?

I wonder how far they could go with the clock for this CPU with a 35w TDP,
MT should always scale better than piledriver...

bobcat could run as high as 2.2GHz I think (but the highest models were 1.65?)

unfortunately at 1GHz CPU performance is to low for the good IGP to make any sense (for gaming), but considering the price, I guess is not to bad that it can sort of run a few new games at 15-20FPS, Atom can't at the moment, but the ulv i3/i5 run games better at comparable power usage I think,
 
I'm not seeing anything all that bad? If you keep it in the realm of tablets it is quite good unless I missed something?
 
Enigmoid said:
Yeah but the atom z2760 is using a lot less power (think 3-4 watts).

Probably the most relevant power test is 3dmark 06, almost 20 watts. Idles at ~10 watts, The soc is using 9 watts here.

9 watts is pretty high for a tablet (probably going to require a fan or something).

The problem with this chip is that its using too much power for a tablet and isn't quite powerful enough for a notebook.

Given its target market and thermal considerations they should have released a dual core and the same gpu and actually had the dual core reach the 1.4 ghz turbo consistently.
Click to expand...

Dont know. As the cores dont cost anything to add, if they can lower implementation cost thats probably the reason. We dont like it, but probably we will see lots of this type in notebooks because then the OEM can save 2 usd on the fandesign compared to fx. a 25W kabini, and use an even slimmer battery. We also have to face to fact that these machines are designed with very little cost meaning we get lousy bios and implementations in general. All for selling this to everyone and his brother.

And ofcourse this temash variant is meant for docking purpose as the tdp far exceeds the tablet demands (and yes the variant is unballanced imho). I wouldnt be surprised to see fanless labtops with temash. Then they can be even slimmer, smaller and ....cheaper 🙂

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the APU from a technical perspective. The problem is, there is very little profit in this market for AMD, and its the only cpu product in AMD portfolio that earns anything. The rest is just waste.
 
formulav8 said:
I'm not seeing anything all that bad? If you keep it in the realm of tablets it is quite good unless I missed something?
Click to expand...

compared to Surface PRO is not impressive, but to most the other tablets I think it is.
but the power usage is probably around the surface pro, not the ARM or Atom tablets.
 
SPBHM said:
I guess is not to bad that it can sort of run a few new games at 15-20FPS, Atom can't at the moment, but the ulv i3/i5 run games better at comparable power usage I think,
Click to expand...

Double the power usage. The ULV's are running at 17W without southbridge and this is probably running ~9W maximum with turbo operating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top