Hey guys..Long time lurker @ AT, and just recently saw this forum. Being a political junkie, I now check this forum almost everyday!
Nowadays, I really am wondering why would someone pick Bush over Kerry? So, I decided to write down the key reason Bush supporters claim and argue against them....Here are two of them...
Strong Leader on the War Against Terror
Let me think...Before 9/11 Bush spends a bunch of time on vacation and doesn't pay much attention to al Qaeda. Ok, I give you hindsight is 20/20 and he maybe couldn't have stopped 9/11. However, when 9/11 does happen what does our "strong leader" do. Sit frozen for 7 minutes reading a story to kids. Calm under fire or frozen in fear?
Now, supporters will say he held a nation steady. I don't deny that he did. For many, he was a source of support (and for others, he wasn't). But my point is that any number of politicans could have done the same as Bush did. Bush went on TV, said "We will find these terrorists...America is strong and great...We love freedom...They hate freedom...etc, etc". Don't tell me that John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, John McCain etc could have not done that (especially in this age of speechwriters & media consultants). If you are voting for Bush solely on this reason, then ask yourself would you vote the same way if any of the above were in office during 9/11?
They also point to the War in Afghanistan as an example of his leadership. Again, everyone knew we were going to attack Afghanistan. It doesn't take a "strong leader" to point to Afghanistan and say "bomb the #$(*# out of them". Also, one of Bush's main objectives before the war was to catch bin Laden. Umm......
Iraq? Don't even go there. Sure we got rid of Saddam. But, how many lies did Bush and his administration tell the American people. We, the people who are funding this war. I think we all can agree that a "strong leader" certainly doesn't tell lies to his constituents to start a war.
Honesty
Leading us into war - a war which has taken the lives of almost one thousand US soliders and thousands of civilians, has cost 200 billion dollars, and has created more terrorists - based on deception. However, he is making the world safer...For Bush is a honourable man.
Keeping the real cost of the faulty Medicare plan away from Congress until after they pass it. "Oh, its just around 100 billion dollars over what we told you." However, he is making medicare affordable to all seniors..For Bush is a honourable man.
Many other immoral acts committed by Bush and his party: Disenfranchising thousands of voters in Florida, leaking a CIA agent's name, lying about the Iraq-9/11 connection...But hey, Bush is a honourable man.
-- I'll write what I feel are the other reasons in another post if this topic receives any interest.
Nowadays, I really am wondering why would someone pick Bush over Kerry? So, I decided to write down the key reason Bush supporters claim and argue against them....Here are two of them...
Strong Leader on the War Against Terror
Let me think...Before 9/11 Bush spends a bunch of time on vacation and doesn't pay much attention to al Qaeda. Ok, I give you hindsight is 20/20 and he maybe couldn't have stopped 9/11. However, when 9/11 does happen what does our "strong leader" do. Sit frozen for 7 minutes reading a story to kids. Calm under fire or frozen in fear?
Now, supporters will say he held a nation steady. I don't deny that he did. For many, he was a source of support (and for others, he wasn't). But my point is that any number of politicans could have done the same as Bush did. Bush went on TV, said "We will find these terrorists...America is strong and great...We love freedom...They hate freedom...etc, etc". Don't tell me that John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, John McCain etc could have not done that (especially in this age of speechwriters & media consultants). If you are voting for Bush solely on this reason, then ask yourself would you vote the same way if any of the above were in office during 9/11?
They also point to the War in Afghanistan as an example of his leadership. Again, everyone knew we were going to attack Afghanistan. It doesn't take a "strong leader" to point to Afghanistan and say "bomb the #$(*# out of them". Also, one of Bush's main objectives before the war was to catch bin Laden. Umm......
Iraq? Don't even go there. Sure we got rid of Saddam. But, how many lies did Bush and his administration tell the American people. We, the people who are funding this war. I think we all can agree that a "strong leader" certainly doesn't tell lies to his constituents to start a war.
Honesty
Leading us into war - a war which has taken the lives of almost one thousand US soliders and thousands of civilians, has cost 200 billion dollars, and has created more terrorists - based on deception. However, he is making the world safer...For Bush is a honourable man.
Keeping the real cost of the faulty Medicare plan away from Congress until after they pass it. "Oh, its just around 100 billion dollars over what we told you." However, he is making medicare affordable to all seniors..For Bush is a honourable man.
Many other immoral acts committed by Bush and his party: Disenfranchising thousands of voters in Florida, leaking a CIA agent's name, lying about the Iraq-9/11 connection...But hey, Bush is a honourable man.
-- I'll write what I feel are the other reasons in another post if this topic receives any interest.