• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Teenager shot dead after playing loud music

Page 39 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
xj0hnx said:
And? I can take you to a few neighborhoods were if you are white you will get harassed, and probably murdered, no possibly. to it.
Click to expand...

Difference with your idea is these neighborhoods anyone who isn't from there will get harassed. So it'll have jack shit to do with skin color. In my example it has everything to do with skin color, and the "probably murdered" is a hilarious exaggeration, but I expect nothing less from you.
 
lol, I can imagine spidey07 walking through the Queens Bridge projects lighting up the neighborhood.

"I WAS SCARED FOR MY LIFE"
 
mugs said:
How do you know the "truth?"
Click to expand...

He has to make up a convenient "truth" to justify a thug (basically any below 25 yr old black in Spidy's world) getting killed, by golly it's time we stood up to loud rap music, gunfire is the appropriate solution of course..
 
For those who are advocates of gun ownership would it have been better if...

Dunn were unarmed?

Teens in car were armed?
 
that's just as sad as the guys car that backfired in front of the Cleveland police department and 9 or so cop cars chased him and put 132 bullets in the car, him, and the 30yr old girl passenger
 
blankslate said:
C'mon now.... You know full well the reaction... it'd be even uglier.
Click to expand...

This is what I want the hard right "don't tread on my 2nd amemdment" people to answer.

Given evidence to date wouldn't it have been better for the teenagers in the car to get off the first shot and kill Dunn first?

What about the more likely scenario other people at the scene are killed?

Is this what you people are really advocating?
 
HomerJS said:
This is what I want the hard right "don't tread on my 2nd amemdment" people to answer.

Given evidence to date wouldn't it have been better for the teenagers in the car to get off the first shot and kill Dunn first?

What about the more likely scenario other people at the scene are killed?

Is this what you people are really advocating?
Click to expand...

But what did Dunn do to threaten their lives? If they shot without a threat, that would be murder and the lot of them would be locked up.
 
spidey07 said:
But what did Dunn do to threaten their lives? If they shot without a threat, that would be murder and the lot of them would be locked up.
Click to expand...

They could always SAY that he did, kinda like how Dunn is SAYING that they threatened him.

According to you it's a FACT if the shooter says it so...

Anyway, if they saw his gun they would have had a cause to shoot him AND in that case the gun wouldn't be imaginary but an actual gun that can be seen by everyone who looks at it.
 
JohnOfSheffield said:
They could always SAY that he did, kinda like how Dunn is SAYING that they threatened him.

According to you it's a FACT if the shooter says it so...

Anyway, if they saw his gun they would have had a cause to shoot him AND in that case the gun wouldn't be imaginary but an actual gun that can be seen by everyone who looks at it.
Click to expand...

Only if the shooter isn't a fucking criminal, like the thug in the SUV.
 
LoL

office_space_kit_mat.jpg
 
spidey07 said:
But what did Dunn do to threaten their lives? If they shot without a threat, that would be murder and the lot of them would be locked up.
Click to expand...

Strange man walking up to their car in the middle of the night? Threat. Who knows, guy might of been wearing a hoody too.
 
spidey07 said:
But what did Dunn do to threaten their lives? If they shot without a threat, that would be murder and the lot of them would be locked up.
Click to expand...

If they had a gun (which they didn't) by your logical if they claimed they felt danger the shooting would have been 100% justified. Is this not correct? All it takes for proof is the shooter saying so. The burden of proof is always on the dead person.
 
Last edited:
AznAnarchy99 said:
Strange man walking up to their car in the middle of the night? Threat. Who knows, guy might of been wearing a hoody too.
Click to expand...

That didn't happen though.

Dunn was in his vehicle, did NOT approach the car and shot only when his life was verbally and physically threatened in his occupied vehicle. We've had many cases like this in my state, the only difference is the weapon was found in the deceased car giving probably cause it was shown and no charges filed. In this case, the thugs dumped the weapon...they teach that in thug school.

Look, the guy is going to get convicted of a crime even if he didn't actually commit one.

In my state and many others, you show a weapon and/or verbally threaten anothers life that is justifiable grounds to shoot. He was not a dumb ass for shooting, he was a dumb ass for not simply reporting it and saying "I feared for my life, a weapon and verbal threats on my life were made. I will say nothing else unless my attorney is present".

On one hand he got it right "don't talk to cops", but the guy who calls police first generally wins. Be the guy that calls the cops first, just don't say anything.

Not having video of his justifiable shooting is going to hurt him as it's now down to he said she said.
 
spidey07 said:
Only if the shooter isn't a fucking criminal, like the thug in the SUV.
Click to expand...

Or the thug who drew down and shot up an SUV before driving away and forcing a quick thinking witness to memorize his license plate.

If he wasn't a thug why didn't he call the authoritahs after his justifiable shooting.

Oh wait this victim jumped out of the SUV and proceeded to smash his head onto the concrete right?
 
Again, why did the guilty black thugs come back to the scene of the crime while the innocent white guy takes off and flees the county without contacting the police?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top