Haven't read this article and don't know if her specific case has any merit or not.
What I do know, is that there really is a very strong drive in this nation to vigorously pursue "diversity" for it's own sake. Universities and corporations alike are desperate to be able to fill up their brochures with enough faces of different types. There are also incentives and penalties built into the system at this point for having or not having enough "diversity."
This can ONLY be accomplished at the expense of (particularly heterosexual) (particularly male) whites. No other way to make it happen. Because they are the ones designated as the only "non-diverse" candidates. And they still represent a numerically large group comprising a majority of applications, typically.
Meritocracy is clearly the way to go, because the alternative fills our society with people who often end up in positions they really didn't belong in. And no, for the dumbasses, I'm not saying "people of color" etc never belong in prominent or important positions. They absolutely do, sometimes... but there are a lot of people who are getting ahead without deserving to, or proving they can operate in certain fields at certain levels... because the shiny lure of how "diverse" they were made the people making the decisions either consciously or subconsciously overlook those problems.
Shit like this is built into the system so deeply now... there's a ton of it that is officially sanctioned, and then there are a ton of other practices which are done on the sly..