• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Teen Fights Removal of Bullet in Head

Teen Fights Removal of Bullet in Head
By JUAN A. LOZANO, Associated Press Writer


This booking photo released by the Jefferson County Sherriff's ...
PORT ARTHUR, Texas - In the middle of Joshua Bush's forehead, two inches above his eyes, lies the evidence that prosecutors say could send the teenager to prison for attempted murder: a 9 mm bullet, lodged just under the skin.

Prosecutors say it will prove that Bush, 17, tried to kill the owner of a used-car lot after a robbery in July. And they have obtained a search warrant to extract the slug.

But Bush and his lawyer are fighting the removal, in a legal and medical oddity that raises questions about patient privacy and how far the government can go to solve crimes without running afoul of the constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

"It's unfortunate this arguably important piece of evidence is in a place where it can't be easily retrieved," said Seth Chandler, a professor at the University of Houston Law Center. "You have to balance our desire to convict the guilty against the government not poking around our bodies on a supposition."

Investigators say that Bush was part of a group of gang members who broke into a used car lot and tried to steal vehicles. According to police, Bush tried to shoot businessman Alan Olive, and when Olive returned fire, a bullet struck the teenager and borrowed into the soft, fatty tissue of his forehead.

Prosecutor Ramon Rodriguez said gang members who took part in the robbery identified Bush as one of those involved. When he was questioned about a week later, Bush admitted taking part in the robbery but not the shooting, police said.

"The officers noticed the guy looks like hell. One of his eyes is black and he has a big old knot on his forehead," Rodriguez said. "He tells police he got hurt playing basketball."

A few days later, Bush went to the hospital and told doctors he had been hit by a stray bullet as he sat on a couch in an apartment.

"Officers started putting events together," Rodriguez said.

A judge took the unusual step of issuing a search warrant to retrieve the bullet from Bush's head in October. But a Beaumont doctor determined that small pieces of bone were growing around the slug, and he did not have the proper tools in the emergency room to do it. The doctor said that removal would require surgery under general anesthesia and that no operating rooms were available.

Police then obtained a second search warrant and scheduled the operation for last week at the University of Texas Medical Branch hospital in Galveston. It was postponed again, however, after the hospital decided not to participate for reasons it would not discuss.

Prosecutors said they continue to look for a doctor or hospital willing to remove the bullet.

All sides agree that removing the bullet would not be life-threatening. But Bush's family and attorney say it would be a violation of the teenager's civil rights and set a dangerous precedent.

"When the medical profession divorces itself from its own responsibility and makes itself an arm of the state, it's a dangerous path," said Rife Kimler, Bush's lawyer.

The used car lot owner, Olive, told police that after officers had left the scene following the robbery and he began cleaning up, a man appeared in a nearby alley and threatened to kill him if he helped authorities in their investigation. The man fired at Olive and a shootout followed.

"I just can't believe I missed him at that distance," Olive, a competitive pistol shooter, said in court papers. Olive told authorities he never saw the man's face in the dark alley.

Bush is in jail on charges related to the robbery, but not the shooting.

Tammie Bush, the teen's mother, disputed allegations her son is a gang member.

"We know he's not a criminal," she said. "He's a good kid."

Dr. Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, predicted Bush's rights as a patient will trump the state's desire to get the bullet, and said authorities might have a hard time finding someone willing to extract the slug.

"It truly is a moral quandary," Caplan said. "Doctors are caught between wanting to help solve crimes and their responsibility to patients' rights to refuse a procedure."

 
I don't see why the kid cares about having it removed unless
1. he got shot in the face in the act
2. he somehow got shot in the face by the same gun in a bizarre occurance that nobody will believe
I mean why else would you refuse a free surgery that you're pretty much going to have to get anyway?
 
Wow thats crazy.

btw "a bullet struck the teenager and borrowed into the soft, fatty tissue of his forehead. " Who the heck has fatty issue on their foreheads?
 
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
I don't see why the kid cares about having it removed unless
1. he got shot in the face in the act
2. he somehow got shot in the face by the same gun in a bizarre occurance that nobody will believe
I mean why else would you refuse a free surgery that you're pretty much going to have to get anyway?

Cuz he got shot during the robbery... the bullet is the evidence that would send him to prison.

 
Originally posted by: JSFLY
Wow thats crazy.

btw "a bullet struck the teenager and borrowed into the soft, fatty tissue of his forehead. " Who the heck has fatty issue on their foreheads?

some people need the fat sucked out from the brains instead of their guts. whaddaya know?
 
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
YoungGun, that's what I meant about getting shot in the face in the act

Ah, so what you're saying is that his refusal to have the bullet removed is proof that he took part in the robbery? We all know that's true, but unfortunately that won't help convict him. 🙁

The guy needs to man up and cut it out himself.
 
I see what the argument is here. Basically, the government is saying that they have a RIGHT to perform nonconsentual surgery on you in order to search for evidence.
 
Isn't he going to prison anyway? He admitted to taking part in the robbery, but not shooting at the guy. Just throw him in jail and let him face the long-term health risks of having that thing in his head
 
hmm i can see both.

i wouldnt want the goverment having the right to force someone to have surgery to search for evidence.
 
As much as I would like to see criminals prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, I am much, much more concerned about what precedent this would set for in terms of self-incrimination. The government should not force people to have a surgery performed so as to gather evidence to prosecute that person.
 
He should just have the bullet removed on his own and then discard it where no one will ever find it. I'm sure whatever prison he goes to there will be somebody who can dig it out for him, then throw it away in a storm drain.
 
I don't get why they need surgery to prove it. Why couldn't they simply x-ray his head and see if there's a bullet lodged in there somewhere?
 
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
I don't get why they need surgery to prove it. Why couldn't they simply x-ray his head and see if there's a bullet lodged in there somewhere?

Wouldn't prove where the bullet came from.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
Wouldn't prove where the bullet came from.

Sorry, didn't read the whole story when I posted. Even still, what are the odds of taking part in a robbery, someone accusing you of being shot in the head non-fatally, and then getting shot non-fatally in the head by a stray bullet in an apartment? Not to mention he originally claimed to get a bump while playing basketball... reminds me of your average Columbo villain. Seems beyond a reasonable doubt to me, but meh, I dunno.
 
Back
Top