• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ted Cruz slammed by some for is Facebook statement on Mandella's death.

blankslate

Diamond Member
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ted-cruz-praise-nelson-mandela-criticized-article-1.1539686

Turns out that he posted a respectful statement in memory of Nelson Mandela's influence during and after his prison time.

And it turns out Senator Cruz was criticized by some of his own supporters.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's praise for the late Nelson Mandela did not go over well with some of his supporters, with many expressing outrage that the Republican lawmaker would commend the South African leader.
Oh well, hopefully they'll forget about this and still support his (likely some think) run in 2016.
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ted-cruz-praise-nelson-mandela-criticized-article-1.1539686

Turns out that he posted a respectful statement in memory of Nelson Mandela's influence during and after his prison time.

And it turns out Senator Cruz was criticized by some of his own supporters.

Oh well, hopefully they'll forget about this and still support his (likely some think) run in 2016.

The Jesus of US political right, Ronald Reagan, called Mandela a terrorist and wanted him to stay in prison. He also vetoed the Anti-Apartheid sanctions, and it took Congressional override to get them in place. Mandela wanted one man one vote in Africa. The US right is not even a big fan of one man one vote in the US, trying gerrymander, filibuster, and voter suppression to try to replicate some of the "successes" of Apartheid in keeping a select minority in power.
 
The Jesus of US political right, Ronald Reagan, called Mandela a terrorist and wanted him to stay in prison. He also vetoed the Anti-Apartheid sanctions, and it took Congressional override to get them in place. Mandela wanted one man one vote in Africa. The US right is not even a big fan of one man one vote in the US, trying gerrymander, filibuster, and voter suppression to try to replicate some of the "successes" of Apartheid in keeping a select minority in power.


Well, what do you expect with respect to Reagan? The Repubs still cannot admit Reagan was one of the "Great Expanders" of the government, dramatically increasing the government payroll from 4.965M in 1980 to 5.289M in 1988 (an increase that was finally completely reversed by Clinton), or that Reagan had to increase taxes here and there 11 times during his presidency to reduce the negative effects of his initial massive tax cuts and govt. spending increases and his tripling of the nat'l debt from $700M to $3B.

So much for "smaller govt".
 
Mandela gets props for sticking to his beliefs. Too bad in the end it turned South Africa into a worse place to live for its people.
 
Mandela gets props for sticking to his beliefs. Too bad in the end it turned South Africa into a worse place to live for its people.

Yeah, that's what happen when you deprive an entire people of education, good sanitation, good healthcare, etc... He could not solve all of that in one term, let alone one life-time. And, no, not even your Jesus could fix apartheid in such a short time.
 
Mandela gets props for sticking to his beliefs. Too bad in the end it turned South Africa into a worse place to live for its people.

By all means lets just go back when black people had no rights and were killed for just protesting having to "show me your papers boy"
 
The US right is not even a big fan of one man one vote in the US, trying gerrymander, filibuster, and voter suppression to try to replicate some of the "successes" of Apartheid in keeping a select minority in power.

And yet I keep hearing from the progressives who gerrymander districts that it is how we achieve a diverse balance of representation in the government, that the minorities are not dominated by the majority.

Can't have it both ways.
 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/economic-and-social-crisis-in-post-apartheid-south-africa

The African National Congress (ANC) won a resounding victory in South Africa’s first democratic election in 1994 with a host of promises that it would improve the lives of the Black majority (85% of the population). And whilst there have been gains in some areas, overall, most Black South Africans are materially worse off now than they were under Apartheid.

Hundreds of thousands of jobs have vanished; costs for the basics: electricity, water, food and rents have skyrocketed. Ironically, no longer the pariah of the world, South Africa’s white minority is even better off now than it was under Apartheid (remember the ‘Rainbow Nation’?). The only Blacks to have gained have been a tiny minority, many from the ranks of the (former) liberation movement and the trade unions as well as the South African Communist Party (SACP).

So what went wrong? Did anything go wrong? Has the ANC and its partners in the Tripartite Alliance, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) and the SACP betrayed their roots and sold out Black South Africa? Indeed, sold out the rest of Africa?

In the run-up to the 1994 elections, a nationwide debate (of sorts) took place, the outcome of which was a document titled The Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP). Yours truly even contributed a paragraph or two on the media, privacy and freedom of information section. It doesn’t advocate a socialist South Africa but it most definitely was the first practical step taken to redress the decades of Apartheid discrimination and repression. This is part of what the document had to say about the importance of the RDP (all the emphases are mine):

1.2 WHY DO WE NEED AN RDP?

1.2.1

Our history has been a bitter one dominated by colonialism, racism, apartheid, sexism and repressive labour policies. The result is that poverty and degradation exist side by side with modern cities and a developed mining, industrial and commercial infrastructure. Our income distribution is racially distorted and ranks as one of the most unequal in the world – lavish wealth and abject poverty characterise our society.

1.2.2

The economy was built on systematically enforced racial division in every sphere of our society. Rural areas have been divided into underdeveloped bantustans and well-developed, white-owned commercial farming areas. Towns and cities have been divided into townships without basic infrastructure for blacks and well-resourced suburbs for whites.

1.2.3

Segregation in education, health, welfare, transport and employment left deep scars of inequality and economic inefficiency. In commerce and industry, very large conglomerates dominated by whites control large parts of the economy. Cheap labour policies and employment segregation concentrated skills in white hands. Our workers are poorly equipped for the rapid changes taking place in the world economy. Small and medium- sized enterprises are underdeveloped, while highly protected industries underinvested in research, development and training.

1.2.4

The result is that in every sphere of our society – economic, social, political, moral, cultural, environmental – South Africans are confronted by serious problems. There is not a single sector of South African society, nor a person living in South Africa, untouched by the ravages of apartheid. Whole regions of our country are now suffering as a direct result of the apartheid policies and their collapse.

1.2.5

In its dying years, apartheid unleashed a vicious wave of violence. Thousands and thousands of people have been brutally killed, maimed, and forced from their homes. Security forces have all too often failed to act to protect people, and have frequently been accused of being implicated in, and even fomenting, this violence. We are close to creating a culture of violence in which no person can feel any sense of security in their person and property. The spectre of poverty and/or violence haunts millions of our people.

There is no doubt that the Apartheid system left behind a gargantuan task for the newly democratized South Africa to overcome. Black ‘education’ was limited to producing ‘hewers of wood and carriers of water’, thus the critical skills and infrastructure needed, especially in governance and education would, even with the best will in the world, take a generation or more to produce if the new South Africa was to redress the imbalances created by white minority rule. White rule that had created an advanced, Western state but for only 5% of the population. A bizarre setup. The only country I know of where there are locks on fridge doors to stop the servants stealing food.

But what became known as Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), was and is largely a bad joke, limited to a tiny black elite who were rapidly coopted into the existing white, capitalist power structures.
 
This Ted Cruz thing doesn't surprise me. Probably the only time I have no issues with something Ted Cruz does or says and his own base attacks him for it.
 

Is that website the best you can do?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Research_on_Globalization

A 2005 article in The Jewish Tribune criticized GlobalResearch.ca as "rife with anti-Jewish conspiracy theory and Holocaust denial." B'nai Brith Canada had complained that there were comments on a forum that questioned how many Jews died in the Holocaust. Website editor Michel Chossudovsky responded that there was a disclaimer that the website was not to be held responsible for the views expressed in the forum, and he had the comment removed. He also said that he was of Jewish heritage and would be one of the last people to condone antisemitic views. The same article also reported that B'nai Brith Canada wrote a letter to the University of Ottawa (Chossudovsky's former employer) asking for the university "to conduct its own investigation of this propagandist site."

CRG was described in 2011 as having "an intimate and wildly successful relationship" with the RT network (previously known as "Russia Today").
 
So if life for a majority here would improve under a dictatorship I guess you would support it.

Life is worse for blacks post apartheid because the whites who lost power pretty much did everything they could to make it fail.

It is akin to destroying something so no one else gets it.

Hmm...sounds like certain political parties play book😉
 
Back
Top