- Mar 23, 2010
- 1,558
- 1,181
- 136
Came across an excellent review video from Hardware Unboxed featuring the brand new Intel i7 7800X versus the AMD R5 1600. Both 6-core models are equipped with identical RAM and put through the paces in 30 games with both stock and overclocked, complete with power consumption testing. Video Link -- Text Link
At stock frequency:
i7 7800X is using 22.6% more power than Ryzen 1600X
Overclocked:
i7 7800X is using 17.9% more power than Ryzen 1600X
Note: incredibly.. Ryzen 1600X is using a good bit less power than a stock clocked, quad core 7700k.
Gaming composite:
Performance is identical with both platforms overclocked. Almost spooky how they are completely equal. 7700k is about 10% ahead but if you take out just 1 game from the stack, Gears of War 4, the delta is equal to 6%. Not a bad showing for the Ryzen despite a 20% clockspeed advantage.
My biggest takeaway here would be the value you get from each as a gamer.
In fairness you could delete the AOI but OC would suffer according to most reviews on Skylake-X, and you could use less RAM but as the author states, it would be odd to get such a platform and use 4x4gb to maintain quad channel memory, or conversely equivalent RAM but only dual channel operation. A closer comparison for some may be more like $514 vs $800 if you use a cheap air cooler and less RAM. That ~$300 difference may very well mean the difference between a 1070 and a 1080Ti.
Gaming Value:
Ryzen 1600: 0.245 FPS/$
Core 7800X: 0.1575 FPS/$
note: I used the more Intel friendly $800 figure with air cooler and dual channel memory.
Bottom line: AMD Ryzen 1600 a whopping 55% more cost effective for gaming compared to the Intel i7 7800X all the while being 20% more power efficient.
At stock frequency:
i7 7800X is using 22.6% more power than Ryzen 1600X
Overclocked:
i7 7800X is using 17.9% more power than Ryzen 1600X
Note: incredibly.. Ryzen 1600X is using a good bit less power than a stock clocked, quad core 7700k.
Gaming composite:
Performance is identical with both platforms overclocked. Almost spooky how they are completely equal. 7700k is about 10% ahead but if you take out just 1 game from the stack, Gears of War 4, the delta is equal to 6%. Not a bad showing for the Ryzen despite a 20% clockspeed advantage.
My biggest takeaway here would be the value you get from each as a gamer.
In fairness you could delete the AOI but OC would suffer according to most reviews on Skylake-X, and you could use less RAM but as the author states, it would be odd to get such a platform and use 4x4gb to maintain quad channel memory, or conversely equivalent RAM but only dual channel operation. A closer comparison for some may be more like $514 vs $800 if you use a cheap air cooler and less RAM. That ~$300 difference may very well mean the difference between a 1070 and a 1080Ti.
Gaming Value:
Ryzen 1600: 0.245 FPS/$
Core 7800X: 0.1575 FPS/$
note: I used the more Intel friendly $800 figure with air cooler and dual channel memory.
Bottom line: AMD Ryzen 1600 a whopping 55% more cost effective for gaming compared to the Intel i7 7800X all the while being 20% more power efficient.
Last edited: