Toonces
Golden Member
- Feb 5, 2000
- 1,690
- 0
- 76
I assumed that's what you meant, but most communicative approaches adhere to the target language principle for a reason. With younger learners in particular I don't see using the target language as a problem because it both helps maximize their exposure and forces them to figure out meaning. IMO expediency is weak excuse, especially since if you so desire you can demonstrate your ability in Japanese in other ways - and outside the classroom.
Oh, I believe you misunderstood my position. During in-class time at Elementary there's never use of the native language by myself and only by the classroom teacher as a last resort for more complex theories.
In what situation have you taught ESL? And at what grade level? My students are 6 to 14 years old and range in class time from 6 hours (per year) to 3 hours a week in their public school curriculum. Flexibility in communication approaches is necessary to further encourage interaction and use of English.
And that brings me to another point. Everyone I know who went to Japan to teach is either still there, basically stalling their life (and they all have degrees but now absolutely nothing to show on their professional resume unless they want to teach english forever), or did leave but still it seemed like a waste of time. It can be fun and all that but do not expect to save money, since most don't. Also, if you go there because you have no idea what else to do, that is a big problem and you should solve it now before prolonging it; at some point you'll probably want a 'real' job and it won't really help toward it.
That's the case in many situations and a real problem for some when (if) they want to return home. Be sure you understand what you're getting into and what you want to take out of your time abroad. How you view your goals means it's either a colossal waste of time, or the most rewarding and fulfilling ways to spend a few years.