• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Tea Party scum Joe Walsh owes $100,000+ in child support

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
nehalem256 said:
His wife made an ALLEGATION that he was backed up $100K in child support.
Click to expand...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pardon me if I observe, this thread, as many other P&N threads tend to do, has gone far beyond the individual conduct of Jack Walch, and now focuses, on the far larger questions
about males, females, and children's right's after a failed marriage.

In short, far larger social questions with no easy answers.

But still, if we remove the conduct of Jack Walch and his ex-wife from the social larger questions, there are still countless numbers of "dead beat", dads and Moms, not only in the USA, and also a far larger number all over the world.

With the larger legal doctrine being, what a court in terms of child support can realistically order. With the giant legal inequity being, if either mommy and daddy are "independently wealthy" after the marriage falls apart, said innocent child, can look forward to large child support payments. Yet if Mommy and Daddy don't have two pennies to rub together at the time of divorce, said innocent child produced after the marriage or co-habitation falls apart, can only look forward to very small or non-existent child support.

With the other world wide legal doctrine becoming, if the parent without child custody later becomes far wealthier, the parent with child custody can go back to court, and ask for an increase in child support that will usually be granted by courts. But still that doctrine does not last forever. If the dead beat party in the marriage forgets to become wealthier until after the children he fathered, reach the age of 18 or 21, the parent with custody has no legal recourse.

Which I maintain, any "legal consent agreement" made between Jack Walch and his ex-wife in 4/2008, tells this forum nothing either way. Because such "consent agreements"
typically come with non-disclosure agreements on the side. And if Jack Walch's ex-wife then tries to make more claims, or brake her non-disclosure agreement she will breech the contract.

Just an observation I can't prove one way or the other in the case of Jack Walch.

Other wise, and IMHO, I other wise conclude Jack Walch is a reprehensible human being and a 24 carat phony. With my only regret being, I live in another State and can't legally vote to give Jack Walch the old heave ho.
 
Juror No. 8 said:
No, that's not equality. If women get a choice AFTER the sex to either abort or keep and be responsible for a child that results from sex, then men rightfully get to have the same choice.

If women can choose to abort, then so can men.

If women can choose to keep and be responsible for a child, then so can men.

To say that women get to make a choice both before and after sex, while men only get to make a choice before sex, is discriminatory and unequal treatment under the law.

Sorry, but your arguments have been duly rejected as dumb and inconsistent.
Click to expand...

You are referencing a rational society. We are not a rational society. At least not when it comes to things like this.

Pretty funny though that some cannot refute your thoughts on equality and devolve their rebuttals into what amounts to "I cannot answer so I'll choose to not respond. Therefore I win"! LMFAO!
 
When men can carry the pregnancy they "deserve" a choice.
Men have the choice of refraining from intercourse.
This "aborts" potential children.

The choices suck.
It remains a fact men commit rape, active and passive, and woman have to make hard choices.
Many become pregnant for the wrong reasons.

Basically if you do not actively support single mothers raising kids you have no "right" to make their decisions.
Tour the DSS (Department of Social Services, or your equivalent), attend soup kitchens, stand in line at food pantries, traveling by bus with small kids.
Try to find "affordable" housing and daycare, especially in a "proper" neighborhood, with good schools.

Should drug addicts have children?
How young is too young to have a child?

Why are you obsessed at controlling anothers life?
 
infoiltrator said:
When men can carry the pregnancy they "deserve" a choice.
Men have the choice of refraining from intercourse.
This "aborts" potential children.
Click to expand...

This is exactly what the most right-wing christian would say to women wanting an abortion.

infoiltrator said:
The choices suck.
It remains a fact men commit rape, active and passive, and woman have to make hard choices.
Many become pregnant for the wrong reasons.

Basically if you do not actively support single mothers raising kids you have no "right" to make their decisions.
Tour the DSS (Department of Social Services, or your equivalent), attend soup kitchens, stand in line at food pantries, traveling by bus with small kids.
Try to find "affordable" housing and daycare, especially in a "proper" neighborhood, with good schools.

Should drug addicts have children?
How young is too young to have a child?

Why are you obsessed at controlling anothers life?
Click to expand...

Because they want me to pay for it. If you don't want other people to be involved in your life choices stop forcing them to become involved.
 
Juror No. 8 said:
Wait, aren't you a Big Government worshiping statist? Isn't your political ideology rooted in controlling the lives of others through regulation, taxation, and government violence?

I'm not sure you have any room to talk.
Click to expand...

By "another" he meant woman.

And by "controlling" he meant not supporting her in whatever choices she makes.

Once you understand this, liberalism starts to make a lot more sense.
 
Today was start of early voting here.

Stood on line for two hours.

Can't imagine how long people will be waiting on line election day.

They had 6 voting machines and only two worked reliably, the third one had to be re-booted after every person used it.

These computers were junk.

You had to press like ten times for every box before the touch screen would respond.

Took 20 minutes to get through to the end when it should have only taken like 2 minutes.

Hopefully my vote is the one that kicks this jack boot Walsh out of office.
 
dmcowen674 said:
Today was start of early voting here.

Stood on line for two hours.

Can't imagine how long people will be waiting on line election day.

They had 6 voting machines and only two worked reliably, the third one had to be re-booted after every person used it.

These computers were junk.

You had to press like ten times for every box before the touch screen would respond.

Took 20 minutes to get through to the end when it should have only taken like 2 minutes.

Hopefully my vote is the one that kicks this jack boot Walsh out of office.
Click to expand...

Which voting place were you at? I was at the H.E. village hall this afternoon and the wait was over an hour. I didn't stay.
 
Mixolydian said:
Which voting place were you at? I was at the H.E. village hall this afternoon and the wait was over an hour. I didn't stay.
Click to expand...

You know, it's odd, the Hoffman Estates Village Hall is closer to me but my precinct was Streamwood Village Hall.

Today was a record day for the state the news said, even more than 2008.

This was a Republican won precinct last election voting in all the Tea Party idiots like Joe Walsh.

Hopefully people were lined up to atone for their mistake and vote them out.

If not they deserve every bad thing Republicans do to them.
 
Whats the odds of there being more dead head non child support payers . Demons or Repulsives .. Easy answer Demons . So A repulsive in office acts like a demon and the world freaks out .. LOL
 
dmcowen674 said:
Today was start of early voting here.

Stood on line for two hours.

Can't imagine how long people will be waiting on line election day.

They had 6 voting machines and only two worked reliably, the third one had to be re-booted after every person used it.

These computers were junk.

You had to press like ten times for every box before the touch screen would respond.

Took 20 minutes to get through to the end when it should have only taken like 2 minutes.

Hopefully my vote is the one that kicks this jack boot Walsh out of office.
Click to expand...


This is Chicago, isn't it? Sounds like voter fraud. They probably had the computers rigged to allow the extra votes for Obama and not record the votes for Romney. :twisted:
 
If early voting started today and there are huge lines, why not wait a few days and do it later? Isn't that the purpose of early voting?
 
You should write your state representatives to change to a ballot by mail system. It is much more convenient with less fraud and abuse.
 
Lanyap said:
This is Chicago, isn't it? Sounds like voter fraud. They probably had the computers rigged to allow the extra votes for Obama and not record the votes for Romney. :twisted:
Click to expand...



EDIT: NM, They're still in Cook County.
 
Last edited:
Awesome news, looks like one Radical Tea Party Republican down, many more to go:

10-27-2012

http://couriernews.suntimes.com/159...earmarked-for-walsh-in-race-vs-duckworth.html

SuperPAC pulls back $2.5 million it had earmarked for Walsh in race vs. Duckworth



The conservative SuperPAC that had already plowed $2 million into Tea Party Republican Rep. Joe Walsh’s race and had threatened to put in an additional $2.5 million to “bury” Tammy Duckworth, is now putting its money elsewhere.



The decision comes a week after Walsh, already a flame thrower, made national headlines by declaring that abortion was never necessary to save the life of a mother.

On Friday, a Tribune/WGN poll showed Duckworth ahead by 10 points
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top