Taskbars: Normal or Auto-hide *POLL*

mpitts

Lifer
Jun 9, 2000
14,732
1
81
Auto-hide is only for people who are doing stuff at work that they shouldn't be.
 

HN

Diamond Member
Jan 19, 2001
8,186
4
0
No Auto-Hide (i'm so used to looking at the clock)
Always on-top (of other windows)
No hiding inactive icons
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,987
4,596
126
Auto-hide can far more productive for people who actually do work on their computer.

For example, many people use a resolution that is 1024 pixels high. What is the difference for that resolution? There are many, including:
[*]Microsoft Word. With default Word settings (and default 1" margins) and with auto-hide off, you must scroll to see all the text on one page at 100% zoom. With auto-hide on, you can fit all the text on the page at the same time at 100% zoom.
[*]Adobe Acrobat Reader. Same thing as Word. With auto-hide off, you must scroll to see one full page at 100% zoom. With auto-hide on, you get it all.
[*]Excel. 53 rows at 100% zoom with auto-hide on. 51 with auto-hide off. 4% more data is visible, and 4% less scrolling.
[*]Visual Basic (similar for other languages). 55 lines of code vs 53 lines of code.

Similar major cutoffs occur at other resolutions.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Not only do I keep it visible, it's double-stacked for multi-tasking goodness.
 

boyRacer

Lifer
Oct 1, 2001
18,569
0
0
Originally posted by: rh71
Not only do I keep it visible, it's double-stacked for multi-tasking goodness.

I think that stupid green start button makes double stacking look odd...
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: bR
Originally posted by: rh71
Not only do I keep it visible, it's double-stacked for multi-tasking goodness.

I think that stupid green start button makes double stacking look odd...
I wouldn't know - first thing I do on a new install is switch to classic view.
 

boyRacer

Lifer
Oct 1, 2001
18,569
0
0
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: bR
Originally posted by: rh71
Not only do I keep it visible, it's double-stacked for multi-tasking goodness.

I think that stupid green start button makes double stacking look odd...
I wouldn't know - first thing I do on a new install is switch to classic view.

ahhh...

but the regular theme doesn't look so bad if you've got some gigantic monitor and running high res... too bad i dont.
 

Leper Messiah

Banned
Dec 13, 2004
7,973
8
0
I want to say congrats to skoorb for hitting 50k, because by the time I come back tomorrow, it'll already have gone by...nef!
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
I hate auto-hide. I don't like the delay when I want my start button and I don't like going for something near the bottom of the window and having the stupid bar come up and then having to wait for it to go away. Auto-hide sucks.
 

Patt

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2000
5,288
2
81
I hate auto-hide ... if I need the extra space I close down the bar for good, not so it'll pop up whenever I'm close to it.
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: dullard
Auto-hide can far more productive for people who actually do work on their computer.

For example, many people use a resolution that is 1024 pixels high. What is the difference for that resolution? There are many, including:
[*]Microsoft Word. With default Word settings (and default 1" margins) and with auto-hide off, you must scroll to see all the text on one page at 100% zoom. With auto-hide on, you can fit all the text on the page at the same time at 100% zoom.
[*]Adobe Acrobat Reader. Same thing as Word. With auto-hide off, you must scroll to see one full page at 100% zoom. With auto-hide on, you get it all.
[*]Excel. 53 rows at 100% zoom with auto-hide on. 51 with auto-hide off. 4% more data is visible, and 4% less scrolling.
[*]Visual Basic (similar for other languages). 55 lines of code vs 53 lines of code.

Similar major cutoffs occur at other resolutions.

eh, those 2 lines don't really matter anyway. You can just look at 98% to make up for it