TAS' Challenge thread for Sept 2007: Cosmology@Home

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Rudy Toody

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2006
4,267
421
126
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
Originally posted by: Philippart
in case will rabrittain tie me, these rules apply:

If two or more participants reach their goal or the same number of credits (as calculated to two decimals) then a sudden death challenge starts:
who of those two participants crunches closest to 500 more credits.
The sudden death match starts when all other participants stopped crunching or have passed their goal.

We need to set an additional rule since this is too easy to reach with the fixed credit system.

Sounds good to me.

I just talked to Rex and he is really busy this weekend and may not have a chance to stop his computer in time. As of this afternoon his computer is bone-dry and getting the message about WUs are available but allocated to other platforms.

We can only wait for Sunday midnight UTC.

--Fred

Yes, a modified rule seems to be necessary.

Petrus is thinking
still thinking
this is really hard - if we want to be fair.


Proposal:
This rule is to replace the rule above:
1. Let the crunchers look at their output during the challenge and post the number of credits they would crunch in 24 hours. They may use any number of computers under their control.
2. Let the crunchers crunch for 24 hours - when the time is up the crunchers detach all computers from the project.
3. The cruncher closest to his goal wins.

I think this makes a second tie much less probable ...

This would be too easy to predict. I attach, download 12 WUs, set no more work and let 'er rip!

I think an essay about why they deserve to wear the belt instead of the others who tied.
We all vote!

--Fred

EDIT: We give special consideration if the essay is written on a $20 bill.
 

petrusbroder

Elite Member
Nov 28, 2004
13,348
1,155
126
Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
Originally posted by: petrusbroder
Originally posted by: Rudy Toody
Originally posted by: Philippart
in case will rabrittain tie me, these rules apply:

If two or more participants reach their goal or the same number of credits (as calculated to two decimals) then a sudden death challenge starts:
who of those two participants crunches closest to 500 more credits.
The sudden death match starts when all other participants stopped crunching or have passed their goal.

We need to set an additional rule since this is too easy to reach with the fixed credit system.

Sounds good to me.

I just talked to Rex and he is really busy this weekend and may not have a chance to stop his computer in time. As of this afternoon his computer is bone-dry and getting the message about WUs are available but allocated to other platforms.

We can only wait for Sunday midnight UTC.

--Fred

Yes, a modified rule seems to be necessary.

Petrus is thinking
still thinking
this is really hard - if we want to be fair.


Proposal:
This rule is to replace the rule above:
1. Let the crunchers look at their output during the challenge and post the number of credits they would crunch in 24 hours. They may use any number of computers under their control.
2. Let the crunchers crunch for 24 hours - when the time is up the crunchers detach all computers from the project.
3. The cruncher closest to his goal wins.

I think this makes a second tie much less probable ...

This would be too easy to predict. I attach, download 12 WUs, set no more work and let 'er rip!

I think an essay about why they deserve to wear the belt instead of the others who tied.
We all vote!

--Fred

EDIT: We give special consideration if the essay is written on a $20 bill.

Yeah you are right - about predicting ...
I was thinking about an different kind of job too --- but not about the 20$-bill ;)
 

Rudy Toody

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2006
4,267
421
126
Tom Philippart wins back-to-back Challenges!:thumbsup:

Congratulations, Tom!:thumbsup:
 

petrusbroder

Elite Member
Nov 28, 2004
13,348
1,155
126
The final stats of Cosmology@home are here!
... and they look good! Here are some excerpts:

Team stats:
_ Rank ____ Credits ____ Rank ______ Credits ____ Production ___ Change ____ Name
_Sept 1 ___ Sept 1 ____ Sept 30 ____ Sept 30 ______ in Sept ____ in rank
_23 _______ 77 287.00 ____ 8 _____ 902 687.00 __ 825 400.00 ______ 15 ______ Canada
__7 ______ 650 738.00 ____ 9 _____ 795 638.00 __ 144 900.00 ______ -2 ______ BOINC.BE
_14 ______ 254 190.00 ___ 10 _____ 675 540.00 __ 421 350.00 _______ 4 ______ TeAm AnandTech
__9 ______ 449 001.00 ___ 11 _____ 571 401.00 __ 122 400.00 ______ -2 ______ UK BOINC Team
_12 ______ 305 375.00 ___ 15 _____ 462 425.00 __ 157 050.00 ______ -5 ______ BOINC@Poland

The TeAm has done well. We rose 4 steps, had a great production!
The TAS-effect is quite gratifying: 91,90% of the TeAm's output is done by TAS-members ...

Best five days
__ Date ______ Credits
2007-09-10 ___ 26 900
2007-09-16 ___ 20 100
2007-09-07 ___ 19 350
2007-09-08 ___ 18 600
2007-09-06 ___ 17 850