Originally posted by: Eli
Nice pic.
Thanks. I'm sure you've seen Lirion's stuff... his is a lot better, but then he has much more experience
and better equipment (though I personally would / will go the Nikon route for my next camera).
Don't completely blow off the consumer digital cameras for macros, they aren't
that bad..
Pic from my lowly 2MP A60
I'm not downplaying the ability of some P&Ses to take decent closeups, just none can do the true textbook definition of macro, which is what some people seem to want, and what I posted a sample of. Heck, most "macro" zooms for SLRs can't do true macro.
The other thing I have against P&S digicams is the interaction of the extremely tiny sensor (also why they are so noisey at high ISOs, but that's a discussion for another day) and extremely short focal length needed to get an equivalent perspective to a 35mm camera causes the Depth of Field to be very wide, even up close. This results in a lot of background "garbage" showing more clearly in the shot than it would with a 35mm or reduced frame DSLR. In the end, I don't know what's up with us 35mm macro freaks... we curse the shallow DOF of our systems when trying to photograph that deep flower, and the next day curse the deep DOF of P&S digitals.
N.B. that you can always simulate that blurred background look in Photoshop if it's important to you. I've done it before to "rescue" a shot from my P&S digicam that was fine other than the distracting background.
I imagine the A80 would be just that much better..
It might be somewhat better, but P&S digicams vary so much in closeup capability that I wouldn't want to hazard a guess. A website like
DPReview would probably be a good resource for those wanting more info.
