Cautery,
The fact is, hardware reviewers do an excellent job of providing accurate, unbiased information to those who know how to interpret the data. The great thing about computer hardware is that the Internet community can immediately confirm or rebut any benchmark or stability report posted by a major web site. This makes most reviewers cautious, deliberate and judicial. Where they allow their own informed opinions to leak out and overshadow plain facts, it's not difficult to seperate the two and make our own decisions. (Anand is very reserved in this aspect, and Tom might do well to imitate him)
And as for these forums, I'd like to believe people still have the intelligence to think for themselves. The great thing about our dicussions in our field is that truth and falsehood are nearly absolute: Product A is, or is not, a better value than Product B, and with the performance and price data so readily available to everyone, there can be no serious dispute. If some one says otherwise, they are simply wrong, and I think people will see that.
Your mention of heatsinks is appropriate, because it is a somewhat more qualitative and variable class of product, but I still don't think we have such a lemming mentality here that a lone, sensible voice would be drown out by a chrous of "get heatsink C, it's the best!"
Without specific examples, your rant is more sizzle than steak.
Modus