PistachioByAzul
Diamond Member
If you base your whole life around marijuana, then yes, it's hard to quit. How many people on this board base their whole life around the net? How many could go without for a week and not feel any withdrawl?
Originally posted by: EngineNr9
If you base your whole life around marijuana, then yes, it's hard to quit. How many people on this board base their whole life around the net? How many could go without for a week and not feel any withdrawl?
Originally posted by: gopunk
anybody with half a brain could have realized this *shakes head*
Btw, have you ever smoked weed, or do you just talk s*it about stuff you've never tried before.
Originally posted by: Harvey
Cannibis may be as carcinogenic as tobacco, but although I've been around weed for years, I've never known anyone who could smoke twenty fat j's a day by him/herself. It's also not physically addictive, so it doesn't have that hook that keeps pulling you back when you want to quit.
"We know that a substantial number of chronic marijuana users become addicted, and previous research with animals has shown that stopping heavy marijuana use suddenly can cause distinct withdrawal symptoms," said Dr. Alan I. Leshner, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, which supported this research. "This study shows that marijuana use shares common brain changes and mechanisms with other drugs of abuse."
Originally posted by: apoppin
Anybody who swallows that "crap" put out by the British government is the real dummy.
A total LIE. Absolutely NOT true. Completely disproven. They are comparing the old studies done with "leaf" vs. "bud" (which is still of a factor of 1 to10 or 15).The report is also expected to warn that research carried out in the 1960s and 1970s may underestimate the impact of today's cannabis since it is much more potent than the cannabis smoked then.
The rest of the article is filled with words like "preliminary", "may be", "might be" as to be pure government/journalistic propaganda.
According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in 2000 America experienced the largest percentage increase in alcohol-related traffic deaths on record.
In 2000, 16,653 people were killed in crashes involving alcohol, representing 40 percent of the 41,821 people killed in all traffic crashes (versus 38.3% alcohol-related fatalities in 1999).
In 1999, there were nearly 2 alcohol-related traffic deaths per hour, 43 per day and 303 per week. That is the equivalent of 2 jetliners crashing week after week. (NHTSA, NCSA, 1999
An estimated total of 2,163,200 crashes in the United States involved alcohol, which killed 16,653 and injured an estimated 512,510 people. (Miller et al, PIRE, 2002)
Of the children 0-14 years old who were killed in alcohol-related crashes during 2000, almost half (223) were passengers in a vehicle with drivers who had been drinking. (NHTSA, 2000)
In 2000, 20 percent of the children under 15 years old who were killed in motor vehicle crashes were killed in alcohol-related crashes. (NHTSA, 2000)
Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 4 to 14 years of age. (NHTSA, 2000)
Originally posted by: EngineNr9
LordJezo, why are you so insecure that you have to do this?
It's not physically addictive.