Table of Vishera Reviews.

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
D

DeeDot78

Member
Jul 29, 2011
77
0
0
Needed to avoid having to comb through threads for reviews.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/the-vishera-review-amd-fx8350-fx8320-fx6300-and-fx4300-tested

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328.html

http://www.pcgamer.com/review/amd-fx-8350-review/

http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/amd_fx8350/

http://www.techspot.com/review/586-amd-fx-8350-fx-6300/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/FX-8350_Piledriver_Review/

http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-FX-8350-Vishera-8Core-CPU-Review/?page=10

http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/processors/1295398/amd-fx-8350/2

http://techreport.com/review/23750/amd-fx-8350-processor-reviewed

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/2055/1/

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-fx-8350.html

http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=962&Itemid=63

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...-fx-8350-cpu-review-amds-vishera-arrives.html

http://www.pureoverclock.com/Review...shera-fx-8350-asus-crosshair-v-formula-z-rog/

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_fx_8350_processor_review,1.html

http://www.bjorn3d.com/2012/10/amd-fx-8350/#.UIZJdcXA95Y

http://www.overclockers.com/amd-fx-8350-piledriver-cpu-review

http://www.kitguru.net/components/g...te-hd7970-asus-sabretooth-990fx-r2-review/22/

http://www.hardwareheaven.com/reviews/1598/pg1/amd-fx-8350-processor-review-introduction.html

http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews/processors/31312-amd-fx8350

http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/amd_fx_8350_and_fx_6300.html

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...piledriver-deliver-where-bulldozer-fell-short

http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/46985-amd-fx-8350-piledriver-cpu/

http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-fx-...8ghz--multi-gpu-gaming-performance/17494.html

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/10/22/amd_fx8350_piledriver_processor_ipc_overclocking
 
sm625

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
Not much mention of the fact that super pi time is even worse.
 
inf64

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,691
136
sm625 said:
Not much mention of the fact that super pi time is even worse.
Click to expand...
It's irrelevant when you see this kind of improvement across the board and in much more relevant workloads than useless superpi ;) (both BD and PD at same 4Ghz clock,no Turbo):
8e975378-fc0b-40dd-80bc-c9faa8b83a18.jpg


Then you look at average performance in applications(both MT and lightly threaded averaged):
36a2d662-d268-4d43-955b-d4aa57368cb6.jpg

8350 is around 6% slower than 3770K in their applications test suite,both at stock. Six percent. Margin of error of measurement is around ~3%.


Then in games,FX8350 proves to clearly be the best CPU AMD has made to this date:
a0b01055-55dd-4a94-8614-e2e216f293c3.jpg


It's still some 23% slower than i5 2500K in games alone but costs less and this difference should not be noticeable in 1080p gaming with single high end GPU (when you get ~70 fps you won't notice the difference 86fps brings unless you are some special kind of human being :) ).
 
Last edited:
hokies83

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
I got called a Fan boy troll and a benchmark cherry picker for posting these on OCN lol
 
A

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,111
136
Have any of those reviews tried overclocking on a decent H2O system yet? (I don't want to read them all, so just wondering if someone has read one with a good third party H2O system/kit).
 
J

jason166

Member
Dec 11, 2009
56
1
71
I'm still trying to find some decent BF3 benchmarks. I understand why most sites don't do the MP benchmarks, but the single player framerates are irrelevant when it comes to MP performance, which 90% of what people do with the game.

Has anyone come across any yet ?
 
inf64

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,691
136
@hokies83
Those that called you a troll are obviously trolls themselves :). It's amazing how far some will go in their denial of facts... It's like they are angry that PD does all that and that AMD somehow hurt their feelings :). Pretty sad...

Intel is still way to go for gaming though,but even if one buys 8320/8350 he won't have bad experience in games. Lower performance, yes of course. But there is the point of not noticing the difference and with the solid GPU, 95% of desktop users would be satisfied with unlocked 180$ FX8320.
 
The Alias

The Alias

Senior member
Aug 22, 2012
646
58
91
inf64 said:
@hokies83
Those that called you a troll are obviously trolls themselves :). It's amazing how far some will go in their denial of facts... It's like they are angry that PD does all that and that AMD somehow hurt their feelings :). Pretty sad...

Intel is still way to go for gaming though,but even if one buys 8320/8350 he won't have bad experience in games. Lower performance, yes of course. But there is the point of not noticing the difference and with the solid GPU, 95% of desktop users would be satisfied with unlocked 180$ FX8320.
Click to expand...
I myself would rather the 6300 it seems to offer way more bang for your buck in gaming because it costs less yet it performs nearly the same
 
inf64

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,691
136
The Alias said:
I myself would rather the 6300 it seems to offer way more bang for your buck in gaming because it costs less yet it performs nearly the same
Click to expand...
Yeah that's true. Heck even the FX4300 pulls some nice numbers in games,now being more on par with FX8150. I guess that's why AMD priced 2M FX4300 so close to FX6300,the performance in games is very similar (save one or two games that need moar cores).
 
S

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,065
418
126
Roland00Address said:
Using anandtech cpu bench it appears the l3 cache has almost no effect on workloads with the exception of gaming. The a10-5800k and fx-4300 are both piledriver 4 cores (2 modules) with the same clock speed.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/675?vs=700
Click to expand...

indeed, but the difference in gaming performance is quite big... I'm seeing 20%+?
for the same clock and architecture...

also, the A10 uses a new platform, AMD certainly had the chance to improve some aspects that they cannot with AM3+.
 
hokies83

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
Smoblikat said:
So we can conclude that AMD is still very much useless.
Click to expand...

Pretty much Unless your doing nothing but heavy multi threaded Tasks on an EXTREME Budget And already have an AM3+ board.

And do not have a Microcenter Near by to get a 2700k for 229$.../ 3770k 269$ With the 50$ off MB deal and 20$ rebate on the board...
 
The Alias

The Alias

Senior member
Aug 22, 2012
646
58
91
hokies83 said:
Pretty much Unless your doing nothing but heavy multi threaded Tasks on an EXTREME Budget And already have an AM3+ board.

And do not have a Microcenter Near by to get a 2700k for 229$.../ 3770k 269$ With the 50$ off MB deal and 20$ rebate on the board...
Click to expand...

Wow just wow
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom