<< VoiceStream is infinitely superior to Verizon. GSM is superior to CDMA. In fact, GSM is superior to everything else. 🙂 >>
Perhaps that would be true if Voicestream had enough towers and antennas to adequately cover their areas, but GSM in the US runs in the 1900 MHz range and that?s a problem. The effective range of a 1900 MHz tower is approximately half that of an 800 MHz tower. Now if GSM in the US ran in the 800 MHz range, like in many areas of Europe and the rest of the world, you might have something to argue about.
I don't have personal experience with Voicestream, but I have extensive experience with another 1900 MHz carrier, Sprint PCS. Despite their apparent efforts during my two years with SPCS, service holes remained in areas that should have been fully covered. I guess Sprint PCS doesn't have any customers around 1700 Dupont Ave S, because they don't have a signal there that's worth half a crap. Sprint PCS must not have any customers around 7000 11th Ave S, because they don't have a signal there that's worth half a crap. I guess SprintPCS must not have any customers around 2700 Douglas Drive N, because they don't have a signal that's worth half a crap there. I guess Sprint PCS doesn't have any customers around. . . You got the idea?
Verizon, with their 800 MHz digital towers, has my metro area covered pretty well. 800 MHz has better range and loses less signal strength when you step indoors.
I don't really care about GSM this, TDMA that, or CDMA the other. I care whether the phone is going to make that call from where I'm standing.