• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Switch to Conroe???


I know many of you are now conroe users, I'm planning to upgrade this month but I'm a littel confuse between E6300 & X2 3800+.....

But I notice most of you are overclocking, I want to know if there's still a noticeable performance difference between E6300 & X2 3800+ even without OVERCLOCKING????

Coz I am not planning to overclock but I want fast and power saver cpu....My current rig is a Pentium D 805 & it increase my electricity bill a lot...

So which is more power saver, E6300 or X2 3800+????
 
Read this:
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2802&p=0

The E6300 costs a little more and performs a little better - actually, sometimes a lot better, while requiring significantly less power. A modest o/c of the E6300 (you can easily run it at 2.4 without touching voltage) and you're blowing the x2 3800+ (at stock) out of the water.

And, where stability is concerned, an Intel CPU with an Intel chipset is hard to beat.

My completely biased $0.02.

-phil
 
Originally posted by: phile
Read this:
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2802&p=0

The E6300 costs a little more and performs a little better - actually, sometimes a lot better, while requiring significantly less power. A modest o/c of the E6300 (you can easily run it at 2.4 without touching voltage) and you're blowing the x2 3800+ (at stock) out of the water.

And, where stability is concerned, an Intel CPU with an Intel chipset is hard to beat.

My completely biased $0.02.

:thumbsup:

Even at stock speed the E6300 is a smoker.
 
Originally posted by: phile

The E6300 costs a little more and performs a little better - actually, sometimes a lot better, while requiring less power.

Fixed it for you.

A modest o/c of the E6300 (you can easily run it at 2.4 without touching voltage) and you're blowing the x2 3800+ (at stock) out of the water.

What kind of reasoning is that? Overclock one and leave the other at stock so you can use flashy words such as "blowing out of the water"? Not like you cant OC a 3800+ to 2.4 or 2.5 sometimes even 2.6 without leaving recommended voltage range.

And, where stability is concerned, an Intel CPU with an Intel chipset is hard to beat.

Yea, there is definitely not a single "help me my new box doesnt work the way it should" thread to be found here, as of late. Thanks to Intel.

To stay on topic:

Grab a 6300 and you're on the faster side. A 3800+ aint a bad choice either. They're both worth their money if you, as you said, dont want to overclock.



 
Yea, there is definitely not a single "help me my new box doesnt work the way it should" thread to be found here, as of late. Thanks to Intel.

Most, if not all, of those issues are Bios related.. so don't thank Intel... thank the motherboard manufacturers.
 
Back
Top