Howdy ya'll, thanks for taking the time to read my post. =c)
I was just wondering if there is anything I can do about my swapfile to increase performance.
Currently, I'm running a 2.6c pentium, 4x256 matched pair memory, UW 10k SCSI HD and a 7.2k storage ide drive with 8mb of cache.
I have the swapfile to be configued by windows, and set to be on the scsi hd. The scsi hd is also where my os is installed, and my games are installed onto the storage ide drive. With a gig of ram, when I start to play games like BF2 or WoW, my swapfile goes up into the 1.1-1.3GB range. When I leave the game, it drops to 150MB.
I understood the SF as being created when commit charge to the ram exceeds the physical amount of available ram.
Am I creating a burden on my system by having the swapfile on the same hd as the os, even if it is a faster drive? Should I get another gig of ram so that the amount of available physical memory exceeds the commit charge?
Thanks in advance!
I was just wondering if there is anything I can do about my swapfile to increase performance.
Currently, I'm running a 2.6c pentium, 4x256 matched pair memory, UW 10k SCSI HD and a 7.2k storage ide drive with 8mb of cache.
I have the swapfile to be configued by windows, and set to be on the scsi hd. The scsi hd is also where my os is installed, and my games are installed onto the storage ide drive. With a gig of ram, when I start to play games like BF2 or WoW, my swapfile goes up into the 1.1-1.3GB range. When I leave the game, it drops to 150MB.
I understood the SF as being created when commit charge to the ram exceeds the physical amount of available ram.
Am I creating a burden on my system by having the swapfile on the same hd as the os, even if it is a faster drive? Should I get another gig of ram so that the amount of available physical memory exceeds the commit charge?
Thanks in advance!